IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i2p649-d309303.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Suitability Assessment of the Tools Under a Three-Dimension System of Landscape Monitoring: A Case Study in the NWHS of Bogda

Author

Listed:
  • Shangchen Ha

    (State Key Laboratory of Desert and Oasis Ecology, Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Urumqi 830011, China
    University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100039, China)

  • Zhaoping Yang

    (State Key Laboratory of Desert and Oasis Ecology, Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Urumqi 830011, China)

Abstract

Landscapes provide significant ecosystem service value in Natural World Heritage Sites (NWHSs) and are required to be preserved by regular monitoring and evaluation. It is vital to choose appropriate monitoring tools according to local conditions to guarantee the process is effective and efficient. This study aims to find out the spatial suitability of monitoring tools under a three-dimension system of space-based monitoring, sky-based monitoring, and ground-based monitoring. A suitability assessment was conducted from three aspects—the monitoring environment, object, and effect—from which typical differences existed among the three types of tools. Nine indicators were finalized, in which eight were classified and scored using the Delphi method with objectivity, and the remaining indicator was processed subjectively by quantifying the different monitoring effects on different landscape units by each of the tools. The method was verified using a case study in Bogda of Xinjiang Tianshan through overlay analysis in ArcGIS. The results showed an apparently stepped distribution characteristic related to altitude, where space-based monitoring zones are located in regions of high altitude, and the landscapes in low-altitude regions had the best monitoring effects using the ground-based tool and sky-based tool. Combined with the distribution characteristics of the 3-level protected zones, the results show a consistency with reality and could help planners to strategically deploy monitoring sites and allocate them advisable monitoring facilities and staffing.

Suggested Citation

  • Shangchen Ha & Zhaoping Yang, 2020. "Suitability Assessment of the Tools Under a Three-Dimension System of Landscape Monitoring: A Case Study in the NWHS of Bogda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-25, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:2:p:649-:d:309303
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/2/649/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/2/649/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jenkins, Victoria, 2018. "Protecting the natural and cultural heritage of local landscapes: Finding substance in law and legal decision making," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 73-83.
    2. Viviana Otero Fadul & Ruben Van De Kerchove & Behara Satyanarayana & Columba Martínez-Espinosa & Muhammad Amir Bin Fisol & Mohd Rodila Bin Ibrahim & Sulong Ibrahim & Husain Mohd-Lokman & Richard Lucas, 2018. "Managing mangrove forests from the sky: Forest inventory using field data and Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) imagery in the Matang Mangrove Forest Reserve, peninsular Malaysia," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/269731, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gheorghe-Gavrilă Hognogi & Ana-Maria Pop & Alexandra-Camelia Marian-Potra & Tania Someșfălean, 2021. "The Role of UAS–GIS in Digital Era Governance. A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-31, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andrzej Greinert & Maria Mrówczyńska, 2020. "The Impact of the Process of Academic Education on Differences in Landscape Perception between the Students of Environmental Engineering and Civil Engineering," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-27, June.
    2. Zhengyu Wang & Lubei Yi & Wenqiang Xu & Xueting Zheng & Shimei Xiong & Anming Bao, 2023. "Integration of UAV and GF-2 Optical Data for Estimating Aboveground Biomass in Spruce Plantations in Qinghai, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-17, June.
    3. Kitsakis, Dimitrios & Kalantari, Mohsen & Rajabifard, Abbas & Atazadeh, Behnam & Dimopoulou, Efi, 2019. "Exploring the 3rd dimension within public law restrictions: A case study of Victoria, Australia," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 195-206.
    4. Omer Ozkan & Sezgin Kilic, 2023. "UAV routing by simulation-based optimization approaches for forest fire risk mitigation," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 320(2), pages 937-973, January.
    5. Chidiebere Ofoegbu & Heiko Balzter & Martin Phillips, 2023. "Evidence Synthesis towards a Holistic Landscape Decision Framework: Insight from the Landscape Decisions Programme," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-18, August.
    6. Jiaying Yan & Shuang Du & Jinbo Zhang & Weiyu Yu, 2023. "Analyzing Transregional Vernacular Cultural Landscape Security Patterns with a Nature–Culture Lens: A Case Study of the Yangtze River Delta Demonstration Area, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-29, March.
    7. Han Li & Tian Zhang & Xiaoshu Cao & Lingling Yao, 2023. "Active Utilization of Linear Cultural Heritage Based on Regional Ecological Security Pattern along the Straight Road (Zhidao) of the Qin Dynasty in Shaanxi Province, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-21, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:2:p:649-:d:309303. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.