IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v12y2023i7p1361-d1188806.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Active Utilization of Linear Cultural Heritage Based on Regional Ecological Security Pattern along the Straight Road (Zhidao) of the Qin Dynasty in Shaanxi Province, China

Author

Listed:
  • Han Li

    (Northwest Land and Resource Research Center, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi’an 710119, China
    Natural Resources and National Land Use Research Institute, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi’an 710119, China)

  • Tian Zhang

    (Northwest Land and Resource Research Center, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi’an 710119, China
    Natural Resources and National Land Use Research Institute, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi’an 710119, China)

  • Xiaoshu Cao

    (Northwest Land and Resource Research Center, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi’an 710119, China
    Natural Resources and National Land Use Research Institute, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi’an 710119, China)

  • Lingling Yao

    (Northwest Land and Resource Research Center, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi’an 710119, China
    Natural Resources and National Land Use Research Institute, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi’an 710119, China)

Abstract

Linear cultural heritage—a heritage system spanning time and space—is a large-scale cultural settlement that accommodates various heritage types. Here, we comprehensively explored the Straight Road (Zhidao) of the Qin Dynasty in Shaanxi Province, China, as a gene of traditional cultural connotations and geographical features, and provided holistic conservation strategies and effective utilization paths. From an ecological security pattern perspective, 4399.89 km 2 of ecological sources and 19 ecological nodes were identified based on the importance of four ecosystem services—carbon sequestration and oxygen release, water conservation, habitat maintenance, and soil retention. Then, 45 ecological corridors with a total length of 2938.49 km were determined using the minimum cumulative resistance model. The intersections of ecological corridors were distinguished and the key areas of cultural landscape construction were extracted by taking into account the spatial distribution of existing relics as well as the spatial network relationship of prohibited-development areas and existing gray corridors (roads), blue corridors (rivers), and green ecological corridors (shade zones, green belts, recreational greenways). A plan was proposed to construct 98.45 km 2 of new parks (country parks: 28.38 km 2 , forest parks: 70.07 km 2 ) and 101.26 km of new landscape corridors (urban type: 32.08 km, countryside type: 26.49 km, ecological type: 42.69 km). Multilevel landscape complexes should be built to form a functional and networked ecological–cultural spatial structure system. Findings of this study could provide ecological ideas for promoting the reservation and active utilization of linear cultural-heritage corridors on a regional scale.

Suggested Citation

  • Han Li & Tian Zhang & Xiaoshu Cao & Lingling Yao, 2023. "Active Utilization of Linear Cultural Heritage Based on Regional Ecological Security Pattern along the Straight Road (Zhidao) of the Qin Dynasty in Shaanxi Province, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-21, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:7:p:1361-:d:1188806
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/7/1361/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/7/1361/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Di Zhou & Wei Song, 2021. "Identifying Ecological Corridors and Networks in Mountainous Areas," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-19, April.
    2. Jenkins, Victoria, 2018. "Protecting the natural and cultural heritage of local landscapes: Finding substance in law and legal decision making," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 73-83.
    3. Hui Ye & Zhaoping Yang & Xiaoliang Xu, 2020. "Ecological Corridors Analysis Based on MSPA and MCR Model—A Case Study of the Tomur World Natural Heritage Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-15, January.
    4. Qing Lin & Zheng Lian, 2018. "On Protection of Intangible Cultural Heritage in China from the Intellectual Property Rights Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-19, November.
    5. Zhongwu Zhang & Qi Li & Shixiong Hu, 2022. "Intangible Cultural Heritage in the Yellow River Basin: Its Spatial–Temporal Distribution Characteristics and Differentiation Causes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-17, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Caihong Yang & Huijun Guo & Xiaoyuan Huang & Yanxia Wang & Xiaona Li & Xinyuan Cui, 2022. "Ecological Network Construction of a National Park Based on MSPA and MCR Models: An Example of the Proposed National Parks of “Ailaoshan-Wuliangshan” in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-17, October.
    2. Bo Zhu & Si-Qi Tian & Chien-Chih Wang, 2021. "Improving the Sustainability Effectiveness of Traditional Arts and Crafts Using Supply–Demand and Ordered Logistic Regression Techniques in Taiyuan, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-14, October.
    3. Mengyuan Su & Xiaoqian Fang & Kaiying Sun & Jiahao Bao & Yu Cao, 2023. "Construction and Optimization of an Ecological Network in the Comprehensive Land Consolidation Project of a Small Rural Town in Southeast China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-20, March.
    4. Xifan Chen & Lihua Xu & Rusong Zhu & Qiwei Ma & Yijun Shi & Zhangwei Lu, 2022. "Changes and Characteristics of Green Infrastructure Network Based on Spatio-Temporal Priority," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-17, June.
    5. Qian Zuo & Yong Zhou & Jingyi Liu, 2022. "Construction and Optimization Strategy of an Ecological Network in Mountainous Areas: A Case Study in Southwestern Hubei Province, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-27, August.
    6. Zixuan Lian & Xianhui Feng, 2022. "Urban Green Space Pattern in Core Cities of the Greater Bay Area Based on Morphological Spatial Pattern Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-15, September.
    7. Andrzej Greinert & Maria Mrówczyńska, 2020. "The Impact of the Process of Academic Education on Differences in Landscape Perception between the Students of Environmental Engineering and Civil Engineering," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-27, June.
    8. Jiayin Zhang & Min Wang & Yinbin Lin, 2024. "Evaluations of Guangzhou’s brand building through intangible cultural heritage: a brand equity model," Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 20(2), pages 119-129, June.
    9. Tianshu Liu & Xiangbin Peng & Junjie Li, 2024. "Evaluation of Ecological Sensitivity and Spatial Correlation Analysis of Landscape Patterns in Sanjiangyuan National Park," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-16, June.
    10. Haochen Yu & Jiu Huang & Chuning Ji & Zi’ao Li, 2021. "Construction of a Landscape Ecological Network for a Large-Scale Energy and Chemical Industrial Base: A Case Study of Ningdong, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-24, March.
    11. Yihe Huang & Shouyun Shen & Wenmin Hu & Yurou Li & Guo Li, 2022. "Construction of Cultural Heritage Tourism Corridor for the Dissemination of Historical Culture: A Case Study of Typical Mountainous Multi-Ethnic Area in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-17, December.
    12. Xichen Ge & Liang Sun & Jiongzhen Chen & Shuangrong Cai, 2022. "Land Utilization, Landscape Pattern, and Ecological Efficiency: An Empirical Analysis of Discrimination and Overlap from Suining, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-19, July.
    13. Ling Xiao & Li Cui & Qun’ou Jiang & Meilin Wang & Lidan Xu & Haiming Yan, 2020. "Spatial Structure of a Potential Ecological Network in Nanping, China, Based on Ecosystem Service Functions," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-18, October.
    14. Kitsakis, Dimitrios & Kalantari, Mohsen & Rajabifard, Abbas & Atazadeh, Behnam & Dimopoulou, Efi, 2019. "Exploring the 3rd dimension within public law restrictions: A case study of Victoria, Australia," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 195-206.
    15. Ling Cao & Jie Yin, 2023. "Research on Sharing Behavior Strategy of Cultural Heritage Institutions Based on Evolutionary Game Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-23, June.
    16. Nana Guo & Xinbin Liang & Lingran Meng, 2022. "Evaluation of the Thermal Environmental Effects of Urban Ecological Networks—A Case Study of Xuzhou City, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-24, June.
    17. Yuqing Geng & Hongwei Zhu & Renjun Zhu, 2022. "Coupling Coordination between Cultural Heritage Protection and Tourism Development: The Case of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-22, November.
    18. Ziyang Wang & Peiji Shi & Xuebin Zhang & Huali Tong & Weiping Zhang & Yue Liu, 2021. "Research on Landscape Pattern Construction and Ecological Restoration of Jiuquan City Based on Ecological Security Evaluation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-20, May.
    19. Weijun Hu & Mingxing Li & Xiaomeng Chi & Xinxing Wang & Asad Ullah Khan, 2024. "Intangible cultural heritage research in China from the perspective of intellectual property rights based on bibliometrics and knowledge mapping," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-11, December.
    20. Liang Lv & Shihao Zhang & Jie Zhu & Ziming Wang & Zhe Wang & Guoqing Li & Chen Yang, 2022. "Ecological Restoration Strategies for Mountainous Cities Based on Ecological Security Patterns and Circuit Theory: A Case of Central Urban Areas in Chongqing, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-21, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:7:p:1361-:d:1188806. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.