IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i24p10662-d465439.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainable Smart Healthcare Information Portfolio Strategy Evaluation: An Integrated Activity-Based Costing Decision Model

Author

Listed:
  • Chih-Hao Yang

    (Department of Financial Management, National Defense University, Beitou, Taipei 11258, Taiwan)

  • Hsiu-Li Lee

    (Department of Accounting Information, Chihlee University of Technology, New Taipei City 22050, Taiwan)

  • Wen-Hsien Tsai

    (Department of Business Administration, National Central University, Jhongli, Taoyuan 32001, Taiwan)

  • Sophia Chuang

    (Department of Business Administration, National Central University, Jhongli, Taoyuan 32001, Taiwan)

Abstract

Smart city and smart hospital development comprise a mainstream strategy worldwide to enhance the achievement of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) practices. The smart healthcare industry needs to optimize its smart healthcare information strategies, creating the process-activity value and reducing the cost of healthcare without sacrificing the quality of patient care. This study proposes an decision model of Activity-Based Costing (ABC) concept and Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) techniques that integrates the Decision-Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL), Analytic Network Processes (ANP), the VlseKriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje (VIKOR) and Zero-One Goal Programming (ZOGP) to achieve optimal smart healthcare information system portfolio strategy decisions. The resulting data shows that the perspective of government policy support and the criterion of Minimize Equipment Maintenance Costs are the most significant evaluation factors, and that the Health Data Informational System and Hospital Device and Drug Management System comprise by far the optimal portfolio of smart healthcare information system which strengthen the connection between ABC and MCDM techniques in evaluation process. The major contributions of this study are as follows: (1) the proposed model contributes to the management accounting innovation development of a sustainable city and Operation Research (OR) application; (2) the integrated model can promote the smart healthcare industry development and help decision makers to more accurately understand how to allocate resources and planning for intelligent-related activities to each smart healthcare information system through appropriate cost drivers.

Suggested Citation

  • Chih-Hao Yang & Hsiu-Li Lee & Wen-Hsien Tsai & Sophia Chuang, 2020. "Sustainable Smart Healthcare Information Portfolio Strategy Evaluation: An Integrated Activity-Based Costing Decision Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-15, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:24:p:10662-:d:465439
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/24/10662/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/24/10662/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. A. Charnes & W. W. Cooper & R. O. Ferguson, 1955. "Optimal Estimation of Executive Compensation by Linear Programming," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 1(2), pages 138-151, January.
    2. Kshetri, Nir, 2017. "The evolution of the internet of things industry and market in China: An interplay of institutions, demands and supply," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 49-67.
    3. Vito Albino & Umberto Berardi & Rosa Maria Dangelico, 2015. "Smart Cities: Definitions, Dimensions, Performance, and Initiatives," Journal of Urban Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(1), pages 3-21, January.
    4. Ker, Jun-Ing & Wang, Yichuan & Hajli, Nick, 2018. "Examining the impact of health information systems on healthcare service improvement: The case of reducing in patient-flow delays in a U.S. hospital," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 188-198.
    5. Al-Sayed, Mahmoud & Dugdale, David, 2016. "Activity-based innovations in the UK manufacturing sector: Extent, adoption process patterns and contingency factors," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 38-58.
    6. Annalisa Cocchia, 2014. "Smart and Digital City: A Systematic Literature Review," Progress in IS, in: Renata Paola Dameri & Camille Rosenthal-Sabroux (ed.), Smart City, edition 127, pages 13-43, Springer.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Olga Bogdanov & Veljko Jeremiæ & Sandra Jednak & Mladen Èudanov, 2019. "Scrutinizing the Smart City Index: a multivariate statistical approach," Zbornik radova Ekonomskog fakulteta u Rijeci/Proceedings of Rijeka Faculty of Economics, University of Rijeka, Faculty of Economics and Business, vol. 37(2), pages 777-799.
    2. Anthony Simonofski & Estefanía Serral Asensio & Johannes Smedt & Monique Snoeck, 2019. "Hearing the Voice of Citizens in Smart City Design: The CitiVoice Framework," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 61(6), pages 665-678, December.
    3. Johannes Stübinger & Lucas Schneider, 2020. "Understanding Smart City—A Data-Driven Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-23, October.
    4. Renata Biadacz & Marek Biadacz, 2021. "Implementation of “Smart” Solutions and An Attempt to Measure Them: A Case Study of Czestochowa, Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-28, September.
    5. Guido Perboli & Mariangela Rosano, 2020. "A Taxonomic Analysis of Smart City Projects in North America and Europe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-23, September.
    6. Natalia VESELITSKAYA & Oleg KARASEV & Alexey BELOSHITSKIY, 2019. "Drivers And Barriers For Smart Cities Development," Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 14(1), pages 85-110, February.
    7. Kummitha, Rama Krishna Reddy, 2018. "Entrepreneurial urbanism and technological panacea: Why Smart City planning needs to go beyond corporate visioning?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 330-339.
    8. Koutra, Sesil & Becue, Vincent & Ioakimidis, Christos S., 2019. "Searching for the ‘smart’ definition through its spatial approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 924-936.
    9. Kyunghun Min & Moonyoung Yoon & Katsunori Furuya, 2019. "A Comparison of a Smart City’s Trends in Urban Planning before and after 2016 through Keyword Network Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-25, June.
    10. Stefano Bracco & Federico Delfino & Paola Laiolo & Andrea Morini, 2018. "Planning & Open-Air Demonstrating Smart City Sustainable Districts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-14, December.
    11. Andreas Exner & Livia Cepoiu & Carla Weinzierl & Viviana Asara, 2018. "Performing Smartness Differently - Strategic Enactments of a Global Imaginary in Three European Cities," SRE-Disc sre-disc-2018_05, Institute for Multilevel Governance and Development, Department of Socioeconomics, Vienna University of Economics and Business.
    12. Parul Gupta & Sumedha Chauhan & M. P. Jaiswal, 2019. "Classification of Smart City Research - a Descriptive Literature Review and Future Research Agenda," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 661-685, June.
    13. Raimundo Díaz-Díaz & Luis Muñoz & Daniel Pérez-González, 2017. "The Business Model Evaluation Tool for Smart Cities: Application to SmartSantander Use Cases," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-30, February.
    14. Schiavone, Francesco & Paolone, Francesco & Mancini, Daniela, 2019. "Business model innovation for urban smartization," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 210-219.
    15. Ruben Sánchez-Corcuera & Adrián Nuñez-Marcos & Jesus Sesma-Solance & Aritz Bilbao-Jayo & Rubén Mulero & Unai Zulaika & Gorka Azkune & Aitor Almeida, 2019. "Smart cities survey: Technologies, application domains and challenges for the cities of the future," International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, , vol. 15(6), pages 15501477198, June.
    16. Mora, Luca & Deakin, Mark & Reid, Alasdair, 2019. "Combining co-citation clustering and text-based analysis to reveal the main development paths of smart cities," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 56-69.
    17. Agnieszka Janik & Adam Ryszko & Marek Szafraniec, 2020. "Scientific Landscape of Smart and Sustainable Cities Literature: A Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-39, January.
    18. LEBRUMENT, Norbert & ZUMBO-LEBRUMENT, Cédrine & ROCHETTE, Corinne & ROULET, Thomas J., 2021. "Triggering participation in smart cities: Political efficacy, public administration satisfaction and sense of belonging as drivers of citizens’ intention," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    19. Gabriel Puron-Cid & J. Ramon Gil-Garcia, 2022. "Are Smart Cities Too Expensive in the Long Term? Analyzing the Effects of ICT Infrastructure on Municipal Financial Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-23, May.
    20. Nammi Kim & Seungwoo Yang, 2021. "Characteristics of Conceptually Related Smart Cities (CRSCs) Services from the Perspective of Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-48, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:24:p:10662-:d:465439. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.