IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i24p10275-d459057.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Adjustment of the Indoor Environmental Quality Assessment Field for Taif City-Saudi Arabia

Author

Listed:
  • Amal Shamseldin

    (Civil Engineering Department, College of Engineering, Taif University, P.O. Box 11099, Taif 21099, Saudi Arabia
    Department of Architectural Engineering, College of Engineering, Ain Shams University, Cairo 11566, Egypt)

  • Ashraf Balabel

    (Mechanical Engineering Department, College of Engineering, Taif University, P.O. Box 11099, Taif 21099, Saudi Arabia
    Mechanical Power Engineering Department, College of Engineering, Menoufia University, Menofia 32511, Egypt)

  • Mamdooh Alwetaishi

    (Civil Engineering Department, College of Engineering, Taif University, P.O. Box 11099, Taif 21099, Saudi Arabia)

  • Ahmed Abdelhafiz

    (Civil Engineering Department, College of Engineering, Taif University, P.O. Box 11099, Taif 21099, Saudi Arabia
    Civil Engineering Department, College of Engineering, Assiut University, Assiut 71515, Egypt)

  • Usama Issa

    (Civil Engineering Department, College of Engineering, Taif University, P.O. Box 11099, Taif 21099, Saudi Arabia
    Civil Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Minia University, Minia, 61519, Egypt)

  • Ibrahim Sharaky

    (Civil Engineering Department, College of Engineering, Taif University, P.O. Box 11099, Taif 21099, Saudi Arabia
    Materials Engineering Department, College of Engineering, Zagazig University, Zagazig 44519, Egypt)

  • Mohamed Al-Surf

    (U.S. Green Building Council and Green Business Certification Institute, Jeddah 2354 7654, Saudi Arabia)

  • Mosleh Al-Harthi

    (Electrical Engineering Department, College of Engineering, Taif University, P.O. Box 11099, Taif 21099, Saudi Arabia)

Abstract

Along with the global concern of the Environmental Assessment of Buildings, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) had recently used its system, Mostadam, to provide a suitable method to assess its buildings environmentally. Nevertheless, Mostadam still cannot be used for all Saudi Arabia regions without having misleading results, which is due to its various internal regions with their various characteristics. Taif city has its unique environmental characteristics, which affect all the environmental buildings’ assessment fields. This research aimed to adjust the Indoor Environmental Quality (IEQ) field of Mostadam according to Taif characteristics. The research analyzed Taif characteristics that have an impact on the IEQ field, which are mainly related to the occupants’ different comfort needs and health requirements. Then, according to an analytical methods, authors proposed some changes to adjust Mostadam IEQ field according to these characteristics. The research resulted in an obvious difference between the resulted IEQ items weights and formulation versus the origin one of Mostadam, which proves the need for such adjustment to achieve a fair and trusted assessment to achieve the utmost credible assessment results when assessing buildings environmentally in Taif. It is recommended to adjust other assessment fields similarly later on, and then globally.

Suggested Citation

  • Amal Shamseldin & Ashraf Balabel & Mamdooh Alwetaishi & Ahmed Abdelhafiz & Usama Issa & Ibrahim Sharaky & Mohamed Al-Surf & Mosleh Al-Harthi, 2020. "Adjustment of the Indoor Environmental Quality Assessment Field for Taif City-Saudi Arabia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-27, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:24:p:10275-:d:459057
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/24/10275/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/24/10275/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yinqi Zhang & He Wang & Weijun Gao & Fan Wang & Nan Zhou & Daniel M. Kammen & Xiaoyu Ying, 2019. "A Survey of the Status and Challenges of Green Building Development in Various Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-29, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yu Cao & Cong Xu & Syahrul Nizam Kamaruzzaman & Nur Mardhiyah Aziz, 2022. "A Systematic Review of Green Building Development in China: Advantages, Challenges and Future Directions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-29, September.
    2. Linyan Chen & Xin Gao & Shitao Gong & Zhou Li, 2020. "Regionalization of Green Building Development in China: A Comprehensive Evaluation Model Based on the Catastrophe Progression Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-22, July.
    3. Shi Yin & Yudan Zhao, 2024. "An agent-based evolutionary system model of the transformation from building material industry (BMI) to green intelligent BMI under supply chain management," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-15, December.
    4. Ruveyda Komurlu & Dilara Kalkan Ceceloglu & David Arditi, 2024. "Exploring the Barriers to Managing Green Building Construction Projects and Proposed Solutions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-25, June.
    5. Fan Yang & Qian Mao, 2023. "Auto-Evaluation Model for the Prediction of Building Energy Consumption That Combines Modified Kalman Filtering and Long Short-Term Memory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-16, November.
    6. Bianca Gasparetto Rebelatto & Amanda Lange Salvia & Luciana Londero Brandli & Walter Leal Filho, 2024. "Examining Energy Efficiency Practices in Office Buildings through the Lens of LEED, BREEAM, and DGNB Certifications," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-24, May.
    7. Redouan Assadiki & Gérard Merlin & Hervé Boileau & Catherine Buhé & Fouzi Belmir, 2022. "Status and Prospects of Green Building in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) Region with a Focus on the Moroccan Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-24, October.
    8. Katherine Brookfield & Charlotte Dimond & Susannah G. Williams, 2022. "Sustainability Messages in Residential Property Advertising," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-14, December.
    9. Shadeedha Mohamed Saradara & Malik Mansoor Ali Khalfan & Abdul Rauf & Rubina Qureshi, 2023. "On The Path towards Sustainable Construction—The Case of the United Arab Emirates: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-26, October.
    10. Lavinia Denisia Cuc & Dana Rad & Daniel Manațe & Silviu Gabriel Szentesi & Anca Dicu & Mioara Florina Pantea & Vanina Adoriana Trifan & Cosmin Silviu Raul Joldeș & Graziella Corina Bâtcă-Dumitru, 2023. "Representations of the Smart Green Concept and the Intention to Implement IoT in Romanian Real Estate Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-15, May.
    11. Niu, Shaoshuai & Kang, Moyun & Liu, Yuqi & Lin, Wei & Liang, Chenchen & Zhao, Yiqiang & Cheng, Jiaji, 2023. "The preparation and characterization of phase change material microcapsules with multifunctional carbon nanotubes for controlling temperature," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    12. Zhenmin Yuan & Jianliang Zhou & Yaning Qiao & Yadi Zhang & Dandan Liu & Hui Zhu, 2020. "BIM-VE-Based Optimization of Green Building Envelope from the Perspective of both Energy Saving and Life Cycle Cost," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-16, September.
    13. Danbei Mo & Liang Huang & Linghong Zeng, 2023. "Green Development Level Evaluation of Urban Engineering Construction in the Mid-Low Reaches of Yangtze River, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-19, July.
    14. Saul Nkini & Erik Nuyts & Gabriel Kassenga & Ombeni Swai & Griet Verbeeck, 2024. "Towards More Green Buildings in Tanzania: Knowledge of Stakeholders on Green Building Design Features, Triggers and Pathways for Uptake," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-31, April.
    15. Dan Yu & Bart Dewancker & Fanyue Qian, 2020. "The Identification and Rebound Effect Evaluation of Equipment Energy Efficiency Improvement Policy: A Case Study on Japan’s Top Runner Policy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-18, August.
    16. Yihong Wang & Da Chen & Pingye Tian, 2022. "Research on the Impact Path of the Sustainable Development of Green Buildings: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-23, October.
    17. Ng, Wai Lam & Chin, Min Yee & Zhou, Jinqin & Woon, Kok Sin & Ching, Ann Ying, 2022. "The overlooked criteria in green building certification system: Embodied energy and thermal insulation on non-residential building with a case study in Malaysia," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    18. Xiaokang Wang & Li Zhu & Yue Tang & Haoyu Deng & Haolong Wang, 2024. "Multiple Paths to Green Building Popularization Under the TOE Framework—A Qualitative Comparative Analysis of Fuzzy Sets Based on 26 Chinese Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-21, October.
    19. Tianqi Liu & Lin Chen & Mingyu Yang & Malindu Sandanayake & Pengyun Miao & Yang Shi & Pow-Seng Yap, 2022. "Sustainability Considerations of Green Buildings: A Detailed Overview on Current Advancements and Future Considerations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-23, November.
    20. Sicheng Wang & Yuanyuan Guo & Hao Zhang & Mingming Gao, 2023. "A Life-Cycle Carbon Emissions Evaluation Model for Traditional Residential Houses: Applying to Traditional Dong Dwellings in Qandongnan, Guizhou Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-31, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:24:p:10275-:d:459057. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.