IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i24p10244-d458634.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Geochemical Classification of Global Mine Water Drainage

Author

Listed:
  • Sandisiwe Khanyisa Thisani

    (Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering Technology, University of Johannesburg, Doornfontein 2092, South Africa)

  • Daramy Vondi Von Kallon

    (Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering Technology, University of Johannesburg, Doornfontein 2092, South Africa)

  • Patrick Byrne

    (School of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Liverpool John Moore’s University, Liverpool L3 3AF, UK)

Abstract

This paper evaluates the geochemical distribution and classification of global Acid Mine Drainage (AMD) sources. The geochemical compositions of AMD from 72 mine water sites in 18 countries across 6 continents were referenced from literature. The secondary data were analysed for statistical distribution and mine water classification against the Hill (1968) framework. The research found that the global mine water displayed geochemical concentrations within 2%, 11%, 5%, 9% and 8% of the aluminium, sulphate, acidity, total iron and zinc distribution ranges, respectively, at the 75th percentile. The study also found that 46%, 11.1% and 2.7% of mine water sites met the criteria for Class I, Class II and Class III of the Hill (1968) framework, respectively, while the remaining 40% of sites were omitted by the framework’s geochemical specifications. The results were used to optimise the Hill (1968) framework. The revised framework was proposed for effective AMD geochemical classification, regulation and remediation.

Suggested Citation

  • Sandisiwe Khanyisa Thisani & Daramy Vondi Von Kallon & Patrick Byrne, 2020. "Geochemical Classification of Global Mine Water Drainage," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-16, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:24:p:10244-:d:458634
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/24/10244/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/24/10244/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thomashausen, Sophie & Maennling, Nicolas & Mebratu-Tsegaye, Tehtena, 2018. "A comparative overview of legal frameworks governing water use and waste water discharge in the mining sector," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 143-151.
    2. Wendy Timms & Cameron Holley, 2016. "Mine site water-reporting practices, groundwater take and governance frameworks in the Hunter Valley coalfield, Australia," Water International, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(3), pages 351-370, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hyojik Yoon & Jonghyun Yoon, 2022. "The Impact Evaluation of Acid Mine Drainage on Zebrafish ( Danio rerio ) and Water Fleas ( Daphnia magna ) in the Vicinity of the Geum River Basin in Korea," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-9, December.
    2. Omojola Awogbemi & Daramy Vandi Von Kallon & Kazeem Aderemi Bello, 2022. "Resource Recycling with the Aim of Achieving Zero-Waste Manufacturing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-18, April.
    3. Shaobo Liu & Li Liu & Jiang Li & Qingping Zhou & Yifeng Ji & Wenbo Lai & Cui Long, 2022. "Spatiotemporal Variability of Human Disturbance Impacts on Ecosystem Services in Mining Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-20, June.
    4. Sandisiwe Khanyisa Thisani & Daramy Vandi Von Kallon & Patrick Byrne, 2021. "Effects of Contact Time and Flow Configuration on the Acid Mine Drainage Remediation Capabilities of Pervious Concrete," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-17, September.
    5. Veronika Prepilková & Juraj Poništ & Marián Schwarz & Dagmar Samešová, 2022. "Possibilities of remediation of neutral mine drainage - Removal and recovery of potentially hazardous elements," Soil and Water Research, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 17(4), pages 251-267.
    6. Sandisiwe Khanyisa Thisani & Daramy Vandi Von Kallon & Patrick Byrne, 2021. "Review of Remediation Solutions for Acid Mine Drainage Using the Modified Hill Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-20, July.
    7. Sandisiwe Khanyisa Thisani & Daramy Vandi Von Kallon & Patrick Byrne, 2021. "A Fixed Bed Pervious Concrete Anaerobic Bioreactor for Biological Sulphate Remediation of Acid Mine Drainage Using Simple Organic Matter," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-18, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. James McNeice & Harshit Mahandra & Ahmad Ghahreman, 2022. "Biogenic Production of Thiosulfate from Organic and Inorganic Sulfur Substrates for Application to Gold Leaching," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-16, December.
    2. Lèbre, Éléonore & Owen, John R. & Kemp, Deanna & Valenta, Rick K., 2022. "Complex orebodies and future global metal supply: An introduction," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    3. David Talbot & Guillaume Barbat, 2020. "Water disclosure in the mining sector: An assessment of the credibility of sustainability reports," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(3), pages 1241-1251, May.
    4. Margaret Insley & Yichun Huang, 2020. "The economics of water conservation regulations under uncertainty: An application to Alberta's Lower Athabasca River Region," Working Papers 2003, University of Waterloo, Department of Economics, revised Jul 2020.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:24:p:10244-:d:458634. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.