IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i22p9632-d447221.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing Landscape Fragmentation: A Composite Indicator

Author

Listed:
  • Andrea De Montis

    (Department of Agricultural Sciences, University of Sassari, 07100 Sassari, Italy)

  • Vittorio Serra

    (Department of Agricultural Sciences, University of Sassari, 07100 Sassari, Italy)

  • Amedeo Ganciu

    (Department of Agricultural Sciences, University of Sassari, 07100 Sassari, Italy)

  • Antonio Ledda

    (Department of Agricultural Sciences, University of Sassari, 07100 Sassari, Italy)

Abstract

The assessment and management of landscape fragmentation (LF), i.e., the subdivision of the habitat into smaller and more isolated patches, can benefit from the adoption of a composite indicator explaining, in a unique measure, the various concerns involved. However, the use of composite indicators may be affected by lack of data, subjectivity in algorithm design, and oversimplification connected to reduction to just one index. In these cases, the findings obtained might not provide the researcher with reliable information. In this paper, we design and apply the Composite Indicator of Landscape Fragmentation (CILF), a metric resuming three indicators concerning the effect on LF of transport and mobility infrastructures, human settlements, and patch density per se. The application concerns the measurement of LF spatial pattern and dynamics from 2003 to 2008 of 51 landscape units in the island of Sardinia (Italy). We considered a complete spatial data set, chose the generalized geometric mean as aggregation algorithm, and verified its robustness via sensitivity analysis of the results. We found that, in 2003 and 2008, the CILF spatial pattern shows higher values in coastal areas and has varied randomly, i.e., without a consistent tendency to converge to, or diverge from, a mean value. Overall, we demonstrate that the CILF is a powerful instrument for monitoring LF in Sardinia and advocate that it can be further implemented, following the same methodological framework, by extending the pool of indicators considered and assessing a weighted version of the composite indicator.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrea De Montis & Vittorio Serra & Amedeo Ganciu & Antonio Ledda, 2020. "Assessing Landscape Fragmentation: A Composite Indicator," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-23, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:22:p:9632-:d:447221
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/22/9632/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/22/9632/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Luzzati, T. & Gucciardi, G., 2015. "A non-simplistic approach to composite indicators and rankings: an illustration by comparing the sustainability of the EU Countries," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 25-38.
    2. Wang, H., 2015. "A generalized MCDA–DEA (multi-criterion decision analysis–data envelopment analysis) approach to construct slacks-based composite indicator," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 114-122.
    3. Zanella, Andreia & Camanho, Ana S. & Dias, Teresa G., 2015. "Undesirable outputs and weighting schemes in composite indicators based on data envelopment analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 245(2), pages 517-530.
    4. Badea, Anca Costescu & Rocco S., Claudio M. & Tarantola, Stefano & Bolado, Ricardo, 2011. "Composite indicators for security of energy supply using ordered weighted averaging," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(6), pages 651-662.
    5. Floridi, Matteo & Pagni, Simone & Falorni, Simone & Luzzati, Tommaso, 2011. "An exercise in composite indicators construction: Assessing the sustainability of Italian regions," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(8), pages 1440-1447, June.
    6. Ruiz, Francisco & El Gibari, Samira & Cabello, José M. & Gómez, Trinidad, 2020. "MRP-WSCI: Multiple reference point based weak and strong composite indicators," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    7. Mario Bunge, 1975. "What is a quality of life indicator?," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 2(1), pages 65-79, June.
    8. Attardi, Raffaele & Cerreta, Maria & Sannicandro, Valentina & Torre, Carmelo Maria, 2018. "Non-compensatory composite indicators for the evaluation of urban planning policy: The Land-Use Policy Efficiency Index (LUPEI)," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 264(2), pages 491-507.
    9. Mendola, Daria & Volo, Serena, 2017. "Building composite indicators in tourism studies: Measurements and applications in tourism destination competitiveness," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 541-553.
    10. Karagiannis, Roxani & Karagiannis, Giannis, 2020. "Constructing composite indicators with Shannon entropy: The case of Human Development Index," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    11. Abberger, Klaus & Graff, Michael & Siliverstovs, Boriss & Sturm, Jan-Egbert, 2018. "Using rule-based updating procedures to improve the performance of composite indicators," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 127-144.
    12. Andrea De Montis, 2016. "Measuring the performance of planning: the conformance of Italian landscape planning practices with the European Landscape Convention," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(9), pages 1727-1745, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Manuel Sánchez-Fernández & Juan Miguel Barrigón Morillas & David Montes González & José Juan de Sanjosé Blasco, 2022. "Impact of Roads on Environmental Protected Areas: Analysis and Comparison of Metrics for Assessing Habitat Fragmentation," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-20, October.
    2. Rong Song & Yecui Hu & Mengqi Li, 2021. "Chinese Pattern of Urban Development Quality Assessment: A Perspective Based on National Territory Spatial Planning Initiatives," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-18, July.
    3. Julio Plaza Tabasco & Héctor S. Martínez Sánchez-Mateos, 2021. "Integration Versus Fragmentation, the Role of Minor Rural Networks in Rural Cultural Landscapes. A Study-Case in Spain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-20, April.
    4. Alexey Bilgaev & Erzhena Sadykova & Anna Mikheeva & Taisiya Bardakhanova & Svetlana Ayusheeva & Fujia Li & Suocheng Dong, 2022. "Green Economy Development Progress in the Republic of Buryatia (Russia)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-16, June.
    5. Jia, Xibei & Buyle, Sven & Macário, Rosário, 2023. "Developing an airport sustainability evaluation index through composite indicator approach," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    6. Alexey Bilgaev & Erzhena Sadykova & Fujia Li & Anna Mikheeva & Suocheng Dong, 2021. "Socio-Economic Factor Impact on the Republic of Buryatia (Russia) Green Economic Development Transition," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(20), pages 1-17, October.
    7. Francisco Ruiz & José Manuel Cabello, 2021. "MRP-PCI: A Multiple Reference Point Based Partially Compensatory Composite Indicator for Sustainability Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-19, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yang Ding & Yelin Fu & Kin Keung Lai & W. K. John Leung, 2018. "Using Ranked Weights and Acceptability Analysis to Construct Composite Indicators: A Case Study of Regional Sustainable Society Index," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 139(3), pages 871-885, October.
    2. Gianluca Gucciardi, 2022. "Measuring the relative development and integration of EU countries’ capital markets using composite indicators and cluster analysis," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 158(4), pages 1043-1083, November.
    3. Tianjiao Wang & Yelin Fu, 2020. "Constructing Composite Indicators with Individual Judgements and Best–Worst Method: An Illustration of Value Measure," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 149(1), pages 1-14, May.
    4. Cheng Peng & Xunbo Wu & Yelin Fu & Kin Keung Lai, 2017. "Alternative approaches to constructing composite indicators: an application to construct a Sustainable Energy Index for APEC economies," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 747-759, October.
    5. Tommaso Luzzati & Bruno Cheli & Gianluca Gucciardi, 2017. "Communicating the uncertainty of synthetic indicators: a reassessment of the HDI ranking," Discussion Papers 2017/228, Dipartimento di Economia e Management (DEM), University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
    6. Zhou, P. & Wang, M., 2016. "Carbon dioxide emissions allocation: A review," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 47-59.
    7. Edson Kogachi & Adonias Ferreira & Carlos Cavalcante & Marcelo Embiruçu, 2021. "Development of Performance Evaluation Indicators for Table Grape Packaging Units. 2. Global Indexes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-16, June.
    8. Ruiz, Francisco & El Gibari, Samira & Cabello, José M. & Gómez, Trinidad, 2020. "MRP-WSCI: Multiple reference point based weak and strong composite indicators," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    9. Chao Shi & Kenneth C. Land, 2021. "The Data Envelopment Analysis and Equal Weights/Minimax Methods of Composite Social Indicator Construction: a Methodological Study of Data Sensitivity and Robustness," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 16(4), pages 1689-1716, August.
    10. José Antonio, Palomero-González & Vicent, Almenar-Llongo & Ramón, Fuentes-Pascual, 2022. "A composite indicator index as a proxy for measuring the quality of water supply as perceived by users for urban water services," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    11. Lozano-Oyola, Macarena & Contreras, Ignacio & Blancas, Francisco Javier, 2019. "An Operational Non-compensatory Composite Indicator: Measuring Sustainable Tourism in Andalusian Urban Destinations," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 1-10.
    12. Ziwei Shu & Ramón Alberto Carrasco & Javier Portela García-Miguel & Manuel Sánchez-Montañés, 2022. "Multiple Scenarios of Quality of Life Index Using Fuzzy Linguistic Quantifiers: The Case of 85 Countries in Numbeo," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-28, June.
    13. L. P. Zhang & P. Zhou, 2019. "Reassessment of global climate risk: non-compensatory or compensatory?," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 95(1), pages 271-287, January.
    14. Biggeri, Mario & Ferrone, Lucia, 2022. "Child Sustainable Human Development Index (CSHDI): Monitoring progress for the future generation," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    15. Öztürk, Elif Göksu & Guimarães, Paulo & Tavares Silva, Sandra, 2024. "Building a composite index using the multi-objective approach: An application to the case of human development," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    16. Sueyoshi, Toshiyuki & Yuan, Yan & Goto, Mika, 2017. "A literature study for DEA applied to energy and environment," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 104-124.
    17. Zhang, L.P. & Zhou, P., 2018. "A non-compensatory composite indicator approach to assessing low-carbon performance," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 270(1), pages 352-361.
    18. Genave, Anna & Blancard, Stéphane & Garabedian, Sabine, 2020. "An assessment of energy vulnerability in Small Island Developing States," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    19. Olga Bogdanov & Veljko Jeremiæ & Sandra Jednak & Mladen Èudanov, 2019. "Scrutinizing the Smart City Index: a multivariate statistical approach," Zbornik radova Ekonomskog fakulteta u Rijeci/Proceedings of Rijeka Faculty of Economics, University of Rijeka, Faculty of Economics and Business, vol. 37(2), pages 777-799.
    20. Frederick Buttel & E. Wilkening & Oscar Martinson, 1977. "Ideology and social indicators of the quality of life," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 4(1), pages 353-369, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:22:p:9632-:d:447221. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.