IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i18p7674-d414814.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploration of Influential Determinants for the Adoption of Business Intelligence System in the Textile and Apparel Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Sumera Ahmad

    (School of Computing, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Johor Bahru, Johor 81310, Malaysia)

  • Suraya Miskon

    (Department of Information Systems, Azman Hashim International Business School, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Johor Bahru, Johor 81310, Malaysia)

  • Rana Alabdan

    (Department of Information Systems, College of Computer and Information Sciences, Majmaah University, Al Majmaah 11952, Saudi Arabia)

  • Iskander Tlili

    (Institute of Research and Development, Duy Tan University, Da Nang 550000, Vietnam
    Faculty of Civil Engineering, Duy Tan University, Da Nang 550000, Vietnam)

Abstract

The textile and apparel industry is prone to digitization with business intelligence systems (BIS) and big data concepts to contribute the global sustainability. BIS, an impactful and leading technology, is being implemented in many industrial sectors but almost 80% of BIS fail to give expected results due to unknown reasons. Although many scholars put effort into finding the influential determinants for the BIS implementation, they neglect the BIS adoption context, especially in the textile and apparel industry. A purposive and proportionate choice of potential determinants in the context of adoption would contribute significantly to the success of BIS. Multi-stage research is employed to identify and prioritize the significant determinants. In the first stage, twenty-two semi-structured in-depth interviews are conducted with seventeen textile and apparel companies. Ten significant determinants emerged after thematic analysis of interview data. The determinants are sustainability, competitive pressure, market trends, compatibility, technology maturity, leadership commitment and support, satisfaction with existing systems, sustainable data quality and integrity, users’ traits, and interpersonal communications that influence the adoption of BIS. In the second stage, the Best Worst Method (BWM) is used to calculate the weights for prioritizing the determinants based on experts’ opinion. These weights are then used to evaluate and rank the determinants. The findings of this research show that the leadership commitment and support, sustainability, users’ traits, and technology maturity, are the top-ranked determinants that influence the practitioners’ choice to adopt the BIS in the textile and apparel industry. The results of this study enable the BIS stakeholders to holistically comprehend the significant determinants that would drive or impede the success of BIS projects in the sustainable textile and apparel industry.

Suggested Citation

  • Sumera Ahmad & Suraya Miskon & Rana Alabdan & Iskander Tlili, 2020. "Exploration of Influential Determinants for the Adoption of Business Intelligence System in the Textile and Apparel Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-21, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:18:p:7674-:d:414814
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/18/7674/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/18/7674/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tanko Ishaya, 2012. "Business Intelligence in Telecoms Industry: A Service Oriented Approach," Chapters, in: Daniel Catalan-Matamoros (ed.), Advances in Customer Relationship Management, IntechOpen.
    2. Navodya Denuwara & Juha Maijala & Marko Hakovirta, 2019. "Sustainability Benefits of RFID Technology in the Apparel Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-14, November.
    3. Asma I. Magaireah* & HidayahSulaiman & Nor’ashikin Ali, 2019. "Identifying the Most Critical Factors to Business Intelligence Implementation Success in the Public Sector Organizations," The Journal of Social Sciences Research, Academic Research Publishing Group, vol. 5(2), pages 450-462, 02-2019.
    4. Sumera Ahmad & Suraya Miskon & Rana Alabdan & Iskander Tlili, 2020. "Towards Sustainable Textile and Apparel Industry: Exploring the Role of Business Intelligence Systems in the Era of Industry 4.0," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-23, March.
    5. Lu, Hsi-Peng & Weng, Chien-I, 2018. "Smart manufacturing technology, market maturity analysis and technology roadmap in the computer and electronic product manufacturing industry," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 85-94.
    6. Iqbal, Muhammad & Alam Kazmi, Syed Hasnain & Manzoor, Dr. Amir & Rehman Soomrani, Dr. Abdul & Butt, Shujaat Hussain & Shaikh, Khurram Adeel, 2018. "A Study of Big Data for Business Growth in SMEs: Opportunities & Challenges," MPRA Paper 96034, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Acheampong Owusu & Abbas Ghanbari-Baghestan & Abdolhossein Kalantari, 2017. "Investigating the Factors Affecting Business Intelligence Systems Adoption: A Case Study of Private Universities in Malaysia," International Journal of Technology Diffusion (IJTD), IGI Global, vol. 8(2), pages 1-25, April.
    8. Choi, Tsan-Ming, 2018. "Launching the right new product among multiple product candidates in fashion: Optimal choice and coordination with risk consideration," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 162-171.
    9. Zied Jemai & Imen Safra & Aida Jebali & Hanen Bouchriha & Asma Ghaffari, 2018. "Capacity planning in textile and apparel supply chains," Post-Print hal-01791992, HAL.
    10. Rezaei, Jafar, 2015. "Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 49-57.
    11. William Yeoh & Aleš Popovič, 2016. "Extending the understanding of critical success factors for implementing business intelligence systems," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 67(1), pages 134-147, January.
    12. Farzad Firouzi Jahantigh & Arash Habibi & Azam Sarafrazi, 2019. "A conceptual framework for business intelligence critical success factors," International Journal of Business Information Systems, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 30(1), pages 109-123.
    13. Magnus Boström & Michele Micheletti, 2016. "Introducing the Sustainability Challenge of Textiles and Clothing," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 39(4), pages 367-375, December.
    14. Catherine Le Roux & Marius Pretorius, 2016. "Navigating Sustainability Embeddedness in Management Decision-Making," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-23, May.
    15. Pamela S. Norum, 2017. "Towards Sustainable Clothing Disposition: Exploring the Consumer Choice to Use Trash as a Disposal Option," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-14, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ana-Marija Stjepić & Mirjana Pejić Bach & Vesna Bosilj Vukšić, 2021. "Exploring Risks in the Adoption of Business Intelligence in SMEs Using the TOE Framework," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-18, February.
    2. Sher Jahan Khan & Saeed Badghish & Puneet Kaur & Rajat Sharma & Amandeep Dhir, 2023. "What motivates the purchasing of green apparel products? A systematic review and future research agenda," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(7), pages 4183-4201, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sumera Ahmad & Suraya Miskon & Rana Alabdan & Iskander Tlili, 2020. "Towards Sustainable Textile and Apparel Industry: Exploring the Role of Business Intelligence Systems in the Era of Industry 4.0," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-23, March.
    2. Merhi, Mohammad I., 2021. "Evaluating the critical success factors of data intelligence implementation in the public sector using analytical hierarchy process," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    3. Kuo-Kuang Fan & Yi-Ting Chang, 2023. "Exploring the Key Elements of Sustainable Design from a Social Responsibility Perspective: A Case Study of Fast Fashion Consumers’ Evaluation of Green Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-20, January.
    4. Bin Shen & Qingying Li & Ciwei Dong & Patsy Perry, 2017. "Sustainability Issues in Textile and Apparel Supply Chains," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-6, September.
    5. Alptekin Ulutaş & Ayşe Topal & Dragan Pamučar & Željko Stević & Darjan Karabašević & Gabrijela Popović, 2022. "A New Integrated Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Model for Sustainable Supplier Selection Based on a Novel Grey WISP and Grey BWM Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-20, December.
    6. James J. H. Liou & Perry C. Y. Liu & Huai-Wei Lo, 2020. "A Failure Mode Assessment Model Based on Neutrosophic Logic for Switched-Mode Power Supply Risk Analysis," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-19, December.
    7. Junnan Wu & Xin Liu & Dianqi Pan & Yichen Zhang & Jiquan Zhang & Kai Ke, 2023. "Research on Safety Evaluation of Municipal Sewage Treatment Plant Based on Improved Best-Worst Method and Fuzzy Comprehensive Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-15, May.
    8. Feng, Jianghong & Guo, Ping & Xu, Guangyi & Xu, Gangyan & Ning, Yu, 2024. "An integrated decision framework for resilient sustainable waste electric vehicle battery recycling transfer station site selection," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 373(C).
    9. Gilberto Santos & Jose Carlos Sá & Maria João Félix & Luís Barreto & Filipe Carvalho & Manuel Doiro & Kristína Zgodavová & Miladin Stefanović, 2021. "New Needed Quality Management Skills for Quality Managers 4.0," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-22, May.
    10. Zarei, Esmaeil & Khan, Faisal & Abbassi, Rouzbeh, 2021. "Importance of human reliability in process operation: A critical analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    11. Sarfaraz Hashemkhani Zolfani & Ramin Bazrafshan & Fatih Ecer & Çağlar Karamaşa, 2022. "The Suitability-Feasibility-Acceptability Strategy Integrated with Bayesian BWM-MARCOS Methods to Determine the Optimal Lithium Battery Plant Located in South America," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(14), pages 1-18, July.
    12. Paul, Ananna & Shukla, Nagesh & Trianni, Andrea, 2023. "Modelling supply chain sustainability challenges in the food processing sector amid the COVID-19 outbreak," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 87(PA).
    13. Liang, Fuqi & Brunelli, Matteo & Rezaei, Jafar, 2020. "Consistency issues in the best worst method: Measurements and thresholds," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    14. Pushparenu Bhattacharjee & Syed Abou Iltaf Hussain & V. Dey & U. K. Mandal, 2023. "Failure mode and effects analysis for submersible pump component using proportionate risk assessment model: a case study in the power plant of Agartala," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 14(5), pages 1778-1798, October.
    15. Dilupa Nakandala & Yung Po Tsang & Henry Lau & Carman Ka Man Lee, 2022. "An Industrial Blockchain-Based Multi-Criteria Decision Framework for Global Freight Management in Agricultural Supply Chains," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(19), pages 1-23, September.
    16. Martín-García, Jaime & Gómez-Limón, José A. & Arriaza, Manuel, 2024. "Conversion to organic farming: Does it change the economic and environmental performance of fruit farms?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    17. Zeng, Shouzhen & Zhou, Jiamin & Zhang, Chonghui & Merigó, José M., 2022. "Intuitionistic fuzzy social network hybrid MCDM model for an assessment of digital reforms of manufacturing industry in China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    18. Salimi, Negin & Rezaei, Jafar, 2018. "Evaluating firms’ R&D performance using best worst method," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 147-155.
    19. Željko Stević & Irena Đalić & Dragan Pamučar & Zdravko Nunić & Slavko Vesković & Marko Vasiljević & Ilija Tanackov, 2019. "A new hybrid model for quality assessment of scientific conferences based on Rough BWM and SERVQUAL," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 119(1), pages 1-30, April.
    20. Irena Wojnowska-Baryła & Katarzyna Bernat & Magdalena Zaborowska, 2022. "Strategies of Recovery and Organic Recycling Used in Textile Waste Management," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(10), pages 1-18, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:18:p:7674-:d:414814. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.