IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i17p7056-d405961.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Trade-off Analysis of Economic and Environmental Aspects of a Disruption Based Closed-Loop Supply Chain Network

Author

Listed:
  • Abdul Salam Khan

    (NUST Business School, National University of Science and Technology, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan
    Arts et Métiers Institute of Technology, Université de Lorraine, LCFC, F-57070 Metz, France)

  • Catalin Iulian Pruncu

    (Mechanical Engineering, Imperial College London, Exhibition Road, South Kensington, London SW7 2AZ, UK)

  • Razaullah Khan

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering Technology, University of Technology, Nowshera 24100, Pakistan)

  • Khawar Naeem

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology, Peshawar 25100, Pakistan)

  • Abdul Ghaffar

    (Informatics Research Group, Ton Duc Thang University, Ho Chi Minh City 700000, Vietnam
    Faculty of Mathematics and Statistics, Ton Duc Thang University, 700000 Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam)

  • Pakeeza Ashraf

    (Department of Mathematics, Government Sadiq College Women University, 63100 Bahawalpur, Pakistan)

  • Shah Room

    (Department of Civil Engineering Technology, University of Technology, 24100 Nowshera, Pakistan)

Abstract

Closed-loop supply chain networks are gaining research popularity due to environmental, economic and social concerns. Such networks are primarily designed to overcome carbon footprints and to retrieve end of life products from customers. This study considers a multi echelon closed-loop supply chain in the presence of machine disruption. A multi-objective model is presented to optimize the total cost, the total time and emissions in a closed-loop supply chain network. The aim is to analyze the trade-off between the objectives of cost, time, and emissions and how these decisions are impacted by the selection of different available machines. A number of solution approaches are tested on a case study from the tire industry. The results suggest the improved performance of the hybrid heuristic and the importance of controlling disruption in a closed-loop supply chain network. Furthermore, there is a trade-off between the different objective functions which can help the decision maker to choose a particular solution according to the preference of an organization. Finally, conclusion and future research avenues are provided.

Suggested Citation

  • Abdul Salam Khan & Catalin Iulian Pruncu & Razaullah Khan & Khawar Naeem & Abdul Ghaffar & Pakeeza Ashraf & Shah Room, 2020. "A Trade-off Analysis of Economic and Environmental Aspects of a Disruption Based Closed-Loop Supply Chain Network," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-28, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:17:p:7056-:d:405961
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/17/7056/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/17/7056/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chen, Jen-Ming & Chang, Chia-I, 2013. "Dynamic pricing for new and remanufactured products in a closed-loop supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(1), pages 153-160.
    2. Halit Üster & Sung Ook Hwang, 2017. "Closed-Loop Supply Chain Network Design Under Demand and Return Uncertainty," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(4), pages 1063-1085, November.
    3. Das, Kanchan & Rao Posinasetti, Nageswara, 2015. "Addressing environmental concerns in closed loop supply chain design and planning," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 34-47.
    4. Zhalechian, M. & Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R. & Zahiri, B. & Mohammadi, M., 2016. "Sustainable design of a closed-loop location-routing-inventory supply chain network under mixed uncertainty," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 182-214.
    5. Kim, Taebok & Glock, Christoph H. & Kwon, Yongjang, 2014. "A closed-loop supply chain for deteriorating products under stochastic container return times," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 30-40.
    6. Babazadeh, Reza & Razmi, Jafar & Pishvaee, Mir Saman & Rabbani, Masoud, 2017. "A sustainable second-generation biodiesel supply chain network design problem under risk," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 66(PB), pages 258-277.
    7. Bazan, Ehab & Jaber, Mohamad Y. & Zanoni, Simone, 2017. "Carbon emissions and energy effects on a two-level manufacturer-retailer closed-loop supply chain model with remanufacturing subject to different coordination mechanisms," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 183(PB), pages 394-408.
    8. Jeihoonian, Mohammad & Kazemi Zanjani, Masoumeh & Gendreau, Michel, 2016. "Accelerating Benders decomposition for closed-loop supply chain network design: Case of used durable products with different quality levels," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 251(3), pages 830-845.
    9. Kim, T. & Glock, C. H. & Kwon, Y., 2014. "A closed-loop supply chain for deteriorating products under stochastic container return times," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 62024, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    10. Kenné, Jean-Pierre & Dejax, Pierre & Gharbi, Ali, 2012. "Production planning of a hybrid manufacturing–remanufacturing system under uncertainty within a closed-loop supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(1), pages 81-93.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Luis Francisco López-Castro & Elyn L. Solano-Charris, 2021. "Integrating Resilience and Sustainability Criteria in the Supply Chain Network Design. A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-26, September.
    2. Abdul Salam Khan & Bashir Salah & Dominik Zimon & Muhammad Ikram & Razaullah Khan & Catalin I. Pruncu, 2020. "A Sustainable Distribution Design for Multi-Quality Multiple-Cold-Chain Products: An Integrated Inspection Strategies Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-25, December.
    3. Carlos A. Moreno-Camacho & Jairo R. Montoya-Torres & Anicia Jaegler, 2023. "Sustainable supply chain network design: a study of the Colombian dairy sector," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 324(1), pages 573-599, May.
    4. Augustinas Maceika & Andrej Bugajev & Olga Regina Šostak & Tatjana Vilutienė, 2021. "Decision Tree and AHP Methods Application for Projects Assessment: A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-33, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yang Hu, 2023. "Perspectives in closed-loop supply chains network design considering risk and uncertainty factors," Papers 2306.04819, arXiv.org.
    2. Luttiely Santos Oliveira & Ricardo Luiz Machado, 2021. "Application of optimization methods in the closed-loop supply chain: a literature review," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 41(2), pages 357-400, February.
    3. Gong, Hailei & Zhang, Zhi-Hai, 2022. "Benders decomposition for the distributionally robust optimization of pricing and reverse logistics network design in remanufacturing systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 297(2), pages 496-510.
    4. Maiti, T. & Giri, B.C., 2017. "Two-way product recovery in a closed-loop supply chain with variable markup under price and quality dependent demand," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 183(PA), pages 259-272.
    5. Van Engeland, Jens & Beliën, Jeroen & De Boeck, Liesje & De Jaeger, Simon, 2020. "Literature review: Strategic network optimization models in waste reverse supply chains," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    6. Jahani, Hamed & Abbasi, Babak & Sheu, Jiuh-Biing & Klibi, Walid, 2024. "Supply chain network design with financial considerations: A comprehensive review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 312(3), pages 799-839.
    7. Modak, Nikunja Mohan & Kazemi, Nima & Cárdenas-Barrón, Leopoldo Eduardo, 2019. "Investigating structure of a two-echelon closed-loop supply chain using social work donation as a Corporate Social Responsibility practice," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 207(C), pages 19-33.
    8. Liu, Wenjie & Liu, Wei & Shen, Ningning & Xu, Zhitao & Xie, Naiming & Chen, Jian & Zhou, Huiyu, 2022. "Pricing and collection decisions of a closed-loop supply chain with fuzzy demand," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    9. Alamri, Adel A. & Syntetos, Aris A., 2018. "Beyond LIFO and FIFO: Exploring an Allocation-In-Fraction-Out (AIFO) policy in a two-warehouse inventory model," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 33-45.
    10. Mehmet Talha Dulman & Surendra M. Gupta, 2018. "Evaluation of Maintenance and EOL Operation Performance of Sensor-Embedded Laptops," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 2(1), pages 1-22, January.
    11. Chang, Xiangyun & Xia, Haiyang & Zhu, Huiyun & Fan, Tijun & Zhao, Hongqing, 2015. "Production decisions in a hybrid manufacturing–remanufacturing system with carbon cap and trade mechanism," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 160-173.
    12. Fahimnia, Behnam & Sarkis, Joseph & Eshragh, Ali, 2015. "A tradeoff model for green supply chain planning:A leanness-versus-greenness analysis," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 173-190.
    13. Tanksale, Ajinkya N. & Das, Debabrata & Verma, Priyanka & Tiwari, Manoj Kumar, 2021. "Unpacking the role of primary packaging material in designing green supply chains: An integrated approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    14. Meherishi, Lavanya & Narayana, Sushmita A. & Ranjani, K.S., 2021. "Integrated product and packaging decisions with secondary packaging returns and protective packaging management," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 292(3), pages 930-952.
    15. Reddy, K. Nageswara & Kumar, Akhilesh & Choudhary, Alok & Cheng, T. C. Edwin, 2022. "Multi-period green reverse logistics network design: An improved Benders-decomposition-based heuristic approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 303(2), pages 735-752.
    16. Ozden Tozanli & Gazi Murat Duman & Elif Kongar & Surendra M. Gupta, 2017. "Environmentally Concerned Logistics Operations in Fuzzy Environment: A Literature Survey," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 1(1), pages 1-42, June.
    17. Rui Zhao & Yiyun Liu & Zhenyan Zhang & Sidai Guo & Ming-Lang Tseng & Kuo-Jui Wu, 2018. "Enhancing Eco-Efficiency of Agro-Products’ Closed-Loop Supply Chain under the Belt and Road Initiatives: A System Dynamics Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-15, March.
    18. Zhang, Qinhong & Segerstedt, Anders & Tsao, Yu-Chung & Liu, Biyu, 2015. "Returnable packaging management in automotive parts logistics: Dedicated mode and shared mode," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 234-244.
    19. Dou, Guowei & Choi, Tsan-Ming, 2021. "Does implementing trade-in and green technology together benefit the environment?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 295(2), pages 517-533.
    20. Diabat, Ali & Jebali, Aida, 2021. "Multi-product and multi-period closed loop supply chain network design under take-back legislation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:17:p:7056-:d:405961. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.