IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i16p6440-d397003.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Immersive Virtual Reality-Aided Conjoint Analysis of Urban Square Preference by Living Environment

Author

Listed:
  • Seungnam Kim

    (Department of Urban Design and Studies, Chung-Ang University, Seoul 06974, Korea)

  • Jaecheol Kim

    (Department of Urban Planning and Landscape Architecture, Gachon University, Seongnam-Si 13120, Korea)

  • Beakchan Kim

    (Department of Urban Design and Studies, Chung-Ang University, Seoul 06974, Korea)

Abstract

Though several studies have explored the ways in which people perceive the qualities of urban squares, the influence of living environments on such perceptions has received little attention. To fill this gap, this study examined differences in preferences for urban square design elements, particularly, the ratio of the width of a public space to the height of the surrounding buildings (D/H ratio), square size, and façade details, among people with different living environments. Virtual reality simulation techniques were used in controlled experiments with 100 participants of various nationalities, mostly Koreans, and conjoint analysis was applied to determine what combination of design elements most influenced urban square preferences. Participants experienced eight virtual squares designed with different combinations of the three design elements and assessed them based on five indicators of the quality of urban squares. Among the three design elements, the D/H ratio most significantly influenced the perceptions of quality, regardless of participants’ living environments. We conclude that the level of experience in various urban environments may affect people’s familiarity with these environments and their spatial perception and preferences. We thus suggest that socio-cultural differences related to users’ living environments should receive more attention in urban design practice. We also demonstrate that the emerging combination of immersive virtual reality technology and conjoint analysis can function as a useful tool for urban design research.

Suggested Citation

  • Seungnam Kim & Jaecheol Kim & Beakchan Kim, 2020. "Immersive Virtual Reality-Aided Conjoint Analysis of Urban Square Preference by Living Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-20, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:16:p:6440-:d:397003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/16/6440/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/16/6440/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jonathan Levine & Lawrence Frank, 2007. "Transportation and land-use preferences and residents’ neighborhood choices: the sufficiency of compact development in the Atlanta region," Transportation, Springer, vol. 34(2), pages 255-274, March.
    2. Ahmadreza Shirvani Dastgerdi & Giuseppe De Luca, 2019. "Joining Historic Cities to the Global World: Feasibility or Fantasy?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-14, May.
    3. Iderlina Mateo‐Babiano & Hitoshi Ieda, 2005. "Theoretical discourse on sustainable space design: towards creating and sustaining effective sidewalks," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 14(5), pages 300-314, September.
    4. Maria Francesca Piazzoni & Tridib Banerjee, 2018. "Mimicry in design: the urban form of development," Journal of Urban Design, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(4), pages 482-498, July.
    5. Jaecheol Kim, 2017. "Comparing the Influences of the D/H Ratio, Size, and Facade Design of an Enclosed Square on Its Perceptual Qualities as a Sustainable Urban Space in South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-14, April.
    6. Caroline Chen, 2018. "Designing the Danceable City," Journal of the American Planning Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 84(3-4), pages 237-249, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ahmed Ehab & Tim Heath, 2023. "Exploring Immersive Co-Design: Comparing Human Interaction in Real and Virtual Elevated Urban Spaces in London," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-23, June.
    2. Jaewon Han & Sugie Lee, 2023. "Verification of Immersive Virtual Reality as a Streetscape Evaluation Method in Urban Residential Areas," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-16, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hao Lei & Youmei Zhou, 2022. "Conducting Heritage Tourism-Led Urban Renewal in Chinese Historical and Cultural Urban Spaces: A Case Study of Datong," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-23, November.
    2. Guthrie, Andrew & Fan, Yingling, 2016. "Developers' perspectives on transit-oriented development," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 103-114.
    3. Ahmadreza Shirvani Dastgerdi & Massimo Sargolini & Ilenia Pierantoni, 2019. "Climate Change Challenges to Existing Cultural Heritage Policy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-10, September.
    4. Dong, Hongwei, 2017. "Rail-transit-induced gentrification and the affordability paradox of TOD," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 1-10.
    5. Marek Drliciak & Jan Celko & Michal Cingel & Dusan Jandacka, 2020. "Traffic Volumes as a Modal Split Parameter," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-21, December.
    6. Bradley Bereitschaft, 2023. "The changing ethno-racial profile of ‘very walkable’ urban neighbourhoods in the US (2010–2020): Are minorities under-represented?," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 60(4), pages 638-654, March.
    7. Xinyu Cao & Daniel Chatman, 2016. "How will smart growth land-use policies affect travel? A theoretical discussion on the importance of residential sorting," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 43(1), pages 58-73, January.
    8. Ahmadreza Shirvani Dastgerdi & Giuseppe De Luca & Carlo Francini, 2020. "Reforming Housing Policies for the Sustainability of Historic Cities in the Post-COVID Time: Insights from the Atlas World Heritage," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-12, December.
    9. Mateo-Babiano, Iderlina, 2016. "Pedestrian's needs matter: Examining Manila's walking environment," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 107-115.
    10. Sofia Vale & Felipa de Mello-Sampayo, 2021. "Effect of Hierarchical Parish System on Portuguese Housing Rents," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-17, January.
    11. Giuseppe De Luca & Ahmadreza Shirvani Dastgerdi & Carlo Francini & Giovanni Liberatore, 2020. "Sustainable Cultural Heritage Planning and Management of Overtourism in Art Cities: Lessons from Atlas World Heritage," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-11, May.
    12. Michael Duncan, 2011. "The Synergistic Influence of Light Rail Stations and Zoning on Home Prices," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 43(9), pages 2125-2142, September.
    13. Jiae Han, 2021. "Representational and Authentic: Sustainable Heritage Message through Architectural Experience in the Case of Bernard Tschumi’s Acropolis Museum, Athens," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-15, October.
    14. Pawinee Iamtrakul & Sararad Chayphong & Derlie Mateo-Babiano, 2023. "The Transition of Land Use and Road Safety Studies: A Systematic Literature Review (2000–2021)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-20, May.
    15. Elizabeth C. Delmelle & Yuhong Zhou & Jean-Claude Thill, 2014. "Densification without Growth Management? Evidence from Local Land Development and Housing Trends in Charlotte, North Carolina, USA," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(6), pages 1-16, June.
    16. Sallis, James F. & Saelens, Brian E. & Frank, Lawrence D. & Conway, Terry L. & Slymen, Donald J. & Cain, Kelli L. & Chapman, James E. & Kerr, Jacqueline, 2009. "Neighborhood built environment and income: Examining multiple health outcomes," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 68(7), pages 1285-1293, April.
    17. Nano Langenheim & Marcus White, 2022. "Green Infrastructure and Urban-Renewal Simulation for Street Tree Design Decision-Making: Moderating Demands of Stormwater Management, Sunlight and Visual Aesthetics," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-28, July.
    18. Jeffrey Gauthier & Bill Wooldridge, 2012. "Influences on Sustainable Innovation Adoption: Evidence from Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(2), pages 98-110, February.
    19. Noland, Robert B. & Weiner, Marc D. & DiPetrillo, Stephanie & Kay, Andrew I., 2017. "Attitudes towards transit-oriented development: Resident experiences and professional perspectives," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 130-140.
    20. Huang, Yu & Parker, Dawn & Minaker, Leia, 2021. "Identifying latent demand for transit-oriented development neighbourhoods: Evidence from a mid-sized urban area in Canada," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:16:p:6440-:d:397003. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.