IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i16p6365-d395852.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative Study of Service Quality on VIP Customer Satisfaction in Internet Banking: South Korea Case

Author

Listed:
  • Sangjae Lee

    (College of Business Administration, Sejong University, Seoul 143-747, Korea)

  • Kun Chang Lee

    (Department of Global Administration, SKK Business School/SAIHST (Samsung Advanced Institute for Health Sciences & Technology), Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul 03063, Korea)

Abstract

For Internet banking to compete effectively with traditional brick-and-mortar banking, managers must identify the key determinants of customer satisfaction. While many studies exist on Internet banking, and there is a large base of marketing literature on customers’ perceptions of luxury products, research on the service quality of luxury brands in Internet banking is scarce. Our study investigates service quality that exert influence on customer satisfaction with Internet banking most, along with the moderating role of customer type on the relation between service quality and customer satisfaction. The moderation analysis in our study is the test of difference between general customers and VIP customers which are created according to customer type. Using a web survey of 645 general and VIP (very important person) customers who use Internet banking systems, we examined the effects of fix factors that have an influence on service quality: usefulness, ease of use, and system security, reliability, responsiveness, and empathy. In the full sample, all factors that affect Internet banking quality also affected customer satisfaction significantly. Usefulness, ease of use, and system trust, responsiveness, and empathy are more important in VIP customer satisfaction than in that of general customers, while system security is a more important factor for general than for VIP customers. Our study results indicate that general and VIP customers differently perceive service quality that are relevant to customer satisfaction.

Suggested Citation

  • Sangjae Lee & Kun Chang Lee, 2020. "Comparative Study of Service Quality on VIP Customer Satisfaction in Internet Banking: South Korea Case," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-21, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:16:p:6365-:d:395852
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/16/6365/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/16/6365/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Choi, Eunha & Ko, Eunju & Kim, Angella J., 2016. "Explaining and predicting purchase intentions following luxury-fashion brand value co-creation encounters," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(12), pages 5827-5832.
    2. Zhao, Y. Lisa & Di Benedetto, C. Anthony, 2013. "Designing service quality to survive: Empirical evidence from Chinese new ventures," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(8), pages 1098-1107.
    3. Bazi, Saleh & Filieri, Raffaele & Gorton, Matthew, 2020. "Customers’ motivation to engage with luxury brands on social media," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 223-235.
    4. Shukla, Paurav & Banerjee, Madhumita & Singh, Jaywant, 2016. "Customer commitment to luxury brands: Antecedents and consequences," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(1), pages 323-331.
    5. Kastanakis, Minas N. & Balabanis, George, 2012. "Between the mass and the class: Antecedents of the “bandwagon” luxury consumption behavior," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 65(10), pages 1399-1407.
    6. Octavian Dospinescu, 2012. "E-Wallet. A New Technical Approach," Acta Universitatis Danubius. OEconomica, Danubius University of Galati, issue 5(5), pages 84-94, October.
    7. Kang, Yeu-Jin & Park, Seong-Yeon, 2016. "The perfection of the narcissistic self: A qualitative study on luxury consumption and customer equity," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(9), pages 3813-3819.
    8. Yoo, Jungmin & Park, Minjung, 2016. "The effects of e-mass customization on consumer perceived value, satisfaction, and loyalty toward luxury brands," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(12), pages 5775-5784.
    9. Tynan, Caroline & McKechnie, Sally & Chhuon, Celine, 2010. "Co-creating value for luxury brands," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 63(11), pages 1156-1163, November.
    10. Buellingen, Franz & Woerter, Martin, 2004. "Development perspectives, firm strategies and applications in mobile commerce," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 57(12), pages 1402-1408, December.
    11. Shukla, Paurav & Purani, Keyoor, 2012. "Comparing the importance of luxury value perceptions in cross-national contexts," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 65(10), pages 1417-1424.
    12. Elliot, Statia & Li, Guoxin & Choi, Chris, 2013. "Understanding service quality in a virtual travel community environment," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(8), pages 1153-1160.
    13. Shukla, Paurav, 2011. "Impact of interpersonal influences, brand origin and brand image on luxury purchase intentions: Measuring interfunctional interactions and a cross-national comparison," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 46(2), pages 242-252, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Farhad Aliyev & Taylan Urkmez & Ralf Wagner, 2019. "A comprehensive look at luxury brand marketing research from 2000 to 2016: a bibliometric study and content analysis," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 69(3), pages 233-264, September.
    2. Sharma, Amalesh & Soni, Mauli & Borah, Sourav Bikash & Haque, Tanjum, 2022. "From silos to synergies: A systematic review of luxury in marketing research," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 893-907.
    3. Pillai, Kishore Gopalakrishna & Nair, Smitha R., 2021. "The effect of social comparison orientation on luxury purchase intentions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 89-100.
    4. Pengji Wang & Adrian T. H. Kuah & Qinye Lu & Caroline Wong & K. Thirumaran & Emmanuel Adegbite & Wesley Kendall, 2021. "The impact of value perceptions on purchase intention of sustainable luxury brands in China and the UK," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 28(3), pages 325-346, May.
    5. Ostovan, Nima & Khalili Nasr, Arash, 2022. "The manifestation of luxury value dimensions in brand engagement in self-concept," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    6. Christodoulides, George & Athwal, Navdeep & Boukis, Achilleas & Semaan, Rania W., 2021. "New forms of luxury consumption in the sharing economy," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 89-99.
    7. Stathopoulou, Anastasia & Balabanis, George, 2019. "The effect of cultural value orientation on consumers' perceptions of luxury value and proclivity for luxury consumption," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 298-312.
    8. Shir-Way Siew & Michael S. Minor & Reto Felix, 2018. "The influence of perceived strength of brand origin on willingness to pay more for luxury goods," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 25(6), pages 591-605, November.
    9. Purohit, Sonal & Radia, Karan Nilesh, 2022. "Conceptualizing masstige buying behavior: A mixed-method approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 886-898.
    10. Gurzki, Hannes & Woisetschläger, David M., 2017. "Mapping the luxury research landscape: A bibliometric citation analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 147-166.
    11. Sharma, Purva & Srivastava, Ankur & Sharma, Veenu & Singh, Nidhi & Nijjer, Shivinder, 2024. "Understanding consumer repurchase intentions towards luxury retail brands: Evidence from an emerging market," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    12. Chailan, Claude, 2018. "Art as a means to recreate luxury brands' rarity and value," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 414-423.
    13. Zollo, Lamberto & Filieri, Raffaele & Rialti, Riccardo & Yoon, Sukki, 2020. "Unpacking the relationship between social media marketing and brand equity: The mediating role of consumers’ benefits and experience," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 256-267.
    14. Michaela Merk & Géraldine Michel, 2019. "The dark side of salesperson brand identification in the luxury sector: When brand orientation generates management issues and negative customer perception," Post-Print hal-02045833, HAL.
    15. Shukla, Paurav & Banerjee, Madhumita & Singh, Jaywant, 2016. "Customer commitment to luxury brands: Antecedents and consequences," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(1), pages 323-331.
    16. Inwon Kang & Ilhwan Ma, 2020. "A Study on Bandwagon Consumption Behavior Based on Fear of Missing Out and Product Characteristics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-16, March.
    17. Chapman, Alexis & Dilmperi, Athina, 2022. "Luxury brand value co-creation with online brand communities in the service encounter," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 902-921.
    18. Shukla, Paurav & Rosendo-Rios, Veronica & Khalifa, Dina, 2022. "Is luxury democratization impactful? Its moderating effect between value perceptions and consumer purchase intentions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 782-793.
    19. Quamina, La Toya & Xue, Melanie Tao & Chawdhary, Rahul, 2023. "‘Co-branding as a masstige strategy for luxury brands: Desirable or not?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    20. Gong Sun & Wangshuai Wang & Zhiming Cheng & Jie Li & Junhua Chen, 2017. "The Intermediate Linkage Between Materialism and Luxury Consumption: Evidence from the Emerging Market of China," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 132(1), pages 475-487, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:16:p:6365-:d:395852. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.