IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i15p6170-d392535.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Can a Hybrid Sport Education/Teaching Games for Understanding Volleyball Unit Be More Effective in Less Motivated Students? An Examination into a Set of Motivation-Related Variables

Author

Listed:
  • Luis García-González

    (EFYPAF “Physical Education and Physical Activity Promotion” Research Group, Faculty of Health and Sport Sciences, University of Zaragoza, Huesca, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain)

  • Ángel Abós

    (EFYPAF “Physical Education and Physical Activity Promotion” Research Group, Faculty of Health and Sport Sciences, University of Zaragoza, Huesca, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain
    Faculty of Health Sciences, Isabel I University, 09003 Burgos, Spain)

  • Sergio Diloy-Peña

    (EFYPAF “Physical Education and Physical Activity Promotion” Research Group, Faculty of Health and Sport Sciences, University of Zaragoza, Huesca, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain)

  • Alexander Gil-Arias

    (Centre for Sport Studies, Rey Juan Carlos University, Fuenlabrada, 28933 Madrid, Spain)

  • Javier Sevil-Serrano

    (EFYPAF “Physical Education and Physical Activity Promotion” Research Group, Faculty of Health and Sport Sciences, University of Zaragoza, Huesca, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain
    PROFITH ‘‘PROmoting FITness and Health through Physical Activity’’ Research Group, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Sport and Health University Research Institute (iMUDS), University of Granada, 18010 Granada, Spain)

Abstract

Grounded in Self-Determination Theory (SDT), this study aims to examine whether the effects of a hybrid Sport Education (SE)/Teaching Games for Understanding (TGfU) a volleyball teaching unit were equally effective on a set of SDT-related variables according to students’ initial motivations. A pre-experimental pre-/post-test design without a control group was conducted in a volleyball teaching unit in Physical Education. A final sample of 49 students ( M = 15.50, SD = 0.57), in their fourth year of secondary education, participated in a hybrid SE/TGfU volleyball teaching unit composed of 10 lessons. The structure of this unit was designed according to the characteristics of an SE model, while learning tasks were designed using the TGfU model. Different validated questionnaires on basic psychological need (BPN) support and satisfaction, novelty and variety satisfaction, motivation, and intention to be physically active were completed by students. Three different profiles with different Relative Autonomy Index (RAI) levels (i.e., “high”, “moderate”, and “low”) were identified through cluster analysis before starting the intervention. Although the SE/TGfU of a volleyball teaching unit were effective in improving SDT-related variables in the three profiles identified, a large effect size was observed in profiles with a “moderate” or “low” RAI. The hybridization of these two pedagogical models could be a tool for improving motivational outcomes in students who are less motivated in Physical Education lessons.

Suggested Citation

  • Luis García-González & Ángel Abós & Sergio Diloy-Peña & Alexander Gil-Arias & Javier Sevil-Serrano, 2020. "Can a Hybrid Sport Education/Teaching Games for Understanding Volleyball Unit Be More Effective in Less Motivated Students? An Examination into a Set of Motivation-Related Variables," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-16, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:15:p:6170-:d:392535
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/15/6170/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/15/6170/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Glenn Milligan & Martha Cooper, 1985. "An examination of procedures for determining the number of clusters in a data set," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 50(2), pages 159-179, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liu, Pei-chen Barry & Hansen, Mark & Mukherjee, Avijit, 2008. "Scenario-based air traffic flow management: From theory to practice," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 42(7-8), pages 685-702, August.
    2. Hélène Syed Zwick & S. Ali Shah Syed, 2017. "The polarization impact of the crisis on the Eurozone labour markets: a hierarchical cluster analysis," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(7), pages 472-476, April.
    3. Goethner, Maximilian & Hornuf, Lars & Regner, Tobias, 2021. "Protecting investors in equity crowdfunding: An empirical analysis of the small investor protection act," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    4. Pennings, J.S.J. & van Kranenburg, H.L. & Hagedoorn, J., 2005. "Past, present and future of the telecommunications industry," Research Memorandum 016, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).
    5. Li-Xuan Qin & Steven G. Self, 2006. "The Clustering of Regression Models Method with Applications in Gene Expression Data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 62(2), pages 526-533, June.
    6. Caroline Méjean & Pauline Macouillard & Sandrine Péneau & Camille Lassale & Serge Hercberg & Katia Castetbon, 2014. "Association of Perception of Front-of-Pack Labels with Dietary, Lifestyle and Health Characteristics," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(3), pages 1-11, March.
    7. Li, Pai-Ling & Chiou, Jeng-Min, 2011. "Identifying cluster number for subspace projected functional data clustering," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 55(6), pages 2090-2103, June.
    8. Hyeri Choi & Min Jae Park, 2019. "Evaluating the Efficiency of Governmental Excellence for Social Progress: Focusing on Low- and Lower-Middle-Income Countries," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 141(1), pages 111-130, January.
    9. Alessandra Cepparulo & Antonello Zanfei, 2019. "The diffusion of public eServices in European cities," Working Papers 1904, University of Urbino Carlo Bo, Department of Economics, Society & Politics - Scientific Committee - L. Stefanini & G. Travaglini, revised 2019.
    10. Ana Helena Tavares & Jakob Raymaekers & Peter J. Rousseeuw & Paula Brito & Vera Afreixo, 2020. "Clustering genomic words in human DNA using peaks and trends of distributions," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 14(1), pages 57-76, March.
    11. Noelia Caceres & Luis M. Romero & Francisco J. Morales & Antonio Reyes & Francisco G. Benitez, 2018. "Estimating traffic volumes on intercity road locations using roadway attributes, socioeconomic features and other work-related activity characteristics," Transportation, Springer, vol. 45(5), pages 1449-1473, September.
    12. Michele Cincera, 2005. "Firms' productivity growth and R&D spillovers: An analysis of alternative technological proximity measures," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(8), pages 657-682.
    13. André Lucas & Julia Schaumburg & Bernd Schwaab, 2019. "Bank Business Models at Zero Interest Rates," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(3), pages 542-555, July.
    14. Wang, Ketong & Porter, Michael D., 2018. "Optimal Bayesian clustering using non-negative matrix factorization," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 395-411.
    15. Douglas L. Steinley & M. J. Brusco, 2019. "Using an Iterative Reallocation Partitioning Algorithm to Verify Test Multidimensionality," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 36(3), pages 397-413, October.
    16. Lin Chang-Ching & Ng Serena, 2012. "Estimation of Panel Data Models with Parameter Heterogeneity when Group Membership is Unknown," Journal of Econometric Methods, De Gruyter, vol. 1(1), pages 42-55, August.
    17. Rong, Rong & Houser, Daniel, 2015. "Growing stars: A laboratory analysis of network formation," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 380-394.
    18. Javier Sevil-Serrano & Alberto Aibar-Solana & Ángel Abós & José Antonio Julián & Luis García-González, 2019. "Healthy or Unhealthy? The Cocktail of Health-Related Behavior Profiles in Spanish Adolescents," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-14, August.
    19. Jacques-Antoine Gauthier & Eric D. Widmer & Philipp Bucher & Cédric Notredame, 2009. "How Much Does It Cost?," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 38(1), pages 197-231, August.
    20. Nikolaos Koutsoukis & Pavlos Georgilakis, 2019. "A Chance-Constrained Multistage Planning Method for Active Distribution Networks," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-19, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:15:p:6170-:d:392535. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.