IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i15p6104-d391545.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Attitudes towards Statistics among Business Students: Do Gender, Mathematical Skills and Personal Traits Matter?

Author

Listed:
  • Leiv Opstad

    (NTNU Business School, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491 Trondheim, Norway)

Abstract

The purpose of this article was to investigate different variables, by combining mathematical skills and personal traits using The Big Five Model, to see which have the most influence on business students’ attitudes towards statistics. The Big Five personality traits make up a model for capturing various personal characteristics. Specifically, we aimed to understand why there is a gender difference in attitudes towards statistics. Statistical skills are a key factor for success in business studies. The chosen methods were pairwise comparisons ( t -test) and a linear regression model, using a sample from a Norwegian business school. The finding was that there is a substantial gender gap towards attitudes towards statistics but taking mathematical skills and personal characteristics into consideration then results in this gap becoming much smaller. Furthermore, mathematical skills and personal traits were shown to have an impact on students’ attitudes towards statistics.

Suggested Citation

  • Leiv Opstad, 2020. "Attitudes towards Statistics among Business Students: Do Gender, Mathematical Skills and Personal Traits Matter?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-16, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:15:p:6104-:d:391545
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/15/6104/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/15/6104/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marianne Johnson & Denise Robson & Sarinda Taengnoi, 2014. "A Meta-analysis of the Gender Gap in Performance in Collegiate Economics Courses," Review of Social Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 72(4), pages 436-459, October.
    2. Jiaming Shi & Changxu Wu & Xiuying Qian, 2020. "The Effects of Multiple Factors on Elderly Pedestrians’ Speed Perception and Stopping Distance Estimation of Approaching Vehicles," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-16, June.
    3. Heyeon Park & Hyunjin Oh & Sunjoo Boo, 2019. "The Role of Occupational Stress in the Association between Emotional Labor and Mental Health: A Moderated Mediation Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-12, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Leiv OPSTAD, 2022. "Attitudes Of Master Students Working In The Public Sector Towards Management Education. Does Economics’ Theory Matter?," Management Research and Practice, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 14(4), pages 37-46, December.
    2. Leiv OPSTAD, 2021. "Factors Explaining Business Students’ Performance In An Introductory Mathematics Course. What Are The Impacts Of Gender, Academic Ability, Personality Traits, And Attitudes Towards Mathematics?," Advances in Education Sciences, Department of Communication, Journalism and Education Sciences, University of Craiova and Center of Advanced Studies in Education Sciences (CASES), vol. 3(1), pages 23-43, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hadsell, Lester, 2020. "Not for want of trying: Effort and Success of women in principles of microeconomics," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 35(C).
    2. David Sabiston & Ambrose Leung & Gianfranco Terrazzano, 2017. "Learning styles and performance in principles of economics: does the gender gap exist?," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 37(4), pages 2935-2944.
    3. Virginia Navajas-Romero & Antonio Ariza-Montes & Felipe Hernández-Perlines, 2020. "Analyzing the Job Demands-Control-Support Model in Work-Life Balance: A Study among Nurses in the European Context," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-17, April.
    4. Leiv OPSTAD, 2022. "Attitudes Of Master Students Working In The Public Sector Towards Management Education. Does Economics’ Theory Matter?," Management Research and Practice, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 14(4), pages 37-46, December.
    5. Liuchang Xu & Jie Wang & Dayu Xu & Liang Xu, 2022. "Integrating Individual Factors to Construct Recognition Models of Consumer Fraud Victimization," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-12, January.
    6. Engelhardt, Bryan & Johnson, Marianne & Meder, Martin E., 2021. "Learning in the time of Covid-19: Some preliminary findings," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 37(C).
    7. Yuechao Du & Zhongming Wang, 2021. "How Does Emotional Labor Influence Voice Behavior? The Roles of Work Engagement and Perceived Organizational Support," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-14, September.
    8. Arnold, Ivo J.M., 2020. "Gender and major choice within economics: Evidence from Europe," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 35(C).
    9. Michael Jüttler, 2020. "Predicting economics student retention in higher education: The effects of students’ economic competencies at the end of upper secondary school on their intention to leave their studies in economics," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(2), pages 1-27, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:15:p:6104-:d:391545. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.