IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i14p5796-d386551.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Qualitative Study on Electricity Consumption of Urban and Rural Households in Chiang Rai, Thailand, with a Focus on Ownership and Use of Air Conditioners

Author

Listed:
  • Aya Yoshida

    (National Institute for Environmental Studies, Tsukuba 3058506, Japan)

  • Panate Manomivibool

    (Circular Economy for Waste-free Thailand (CEWT) Research Center, School of Science, Mae Fah Luang University, Chiang Rai 57100, Thailand)

  • Tomohiro Tasaki

    (National Institute for Environmental Studies, Tsukuba 3058506, Japan)

  • Pattayaporn Unroj

    (Circular Economy for Waste-free Thailand (CEWT) Research Center, School of Science, Mae Fah Luang University, Chiang Rai 57100, Thailand)

Abstract

This study investigated the differences in household energy consumption between urban and rural households in northern Thailand, with a particular focus on air-conditioner ownership and use. In-depth visits to 32 households in Chiang Rai were undertaken in 2016 and 2017. The data collection covered six aspects: household attributes, ownership of electric appliances, use of air conditioners (ACs), intentions to conserve electricity, desire to purchase electric appliances in the future, and prospects for a future lifestyle. Traditional stilt houses can still be found in rural areas, but ACs have been introduced as rural houses have modernized. The typical period of AC use in rural areas was 2 to 4 months during summer. In urban households, ACs were used for a longer period, from 3 to 12 months each year. In addition, rural households usually used ACs for only a few hours each day before sleeping, whereas urban households often used them while they slept and some used them throughout the day. Households with children and grandchildren tended to use the AC for longer periods. These results suggest that promotion of environmentally friendly lifestyles for younger adults to control overuse of ACs would be key to reducing energy consumption in the future.

Suggested Citation

  • Aya Yoshida & Panate Manomivibool & Tomohiro Tasaki & Pattayaporn Unroj, 2020. "Qualitative Study on Electricity Consumption of Urban and Rural Households in Chiang Rai, Thailand, with a Focus on Ownership and Use of Air Conditioners," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-19, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:14:p:5796-:d:386551
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/14/5796/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/14/5796/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. D’Oca, Simona & Hong, Tianzhen & Langevin, Jared, 2018. "The human dimensions of energy use in buildings: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 731-742.
    2. Francesco Mancini & Benedetto Nastasi, 2019. "Energy Retrofitting Effects on the Energy Flexibility of Dwellings," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-19, July.
    3. Orose Leelakulthanit, 2017. "Barriers and Benefits of Changing People’s Behavior Regarding Energy Saving of Air Conditioners at Home," Asian Social Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 13(10), pages 130-130, October.
    4. Yun, Geun Young & Steemers, Koen, 2011. "Behavioural, physical and socio-economic factors in household cooling energy consumption," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(6), pages 2191-2200, June.
    5. Hori, Shiro & Kondo, Kayoko & Nogata, Daisuke & Ben, Han, 2013. "The determinants of household energy-saving behavior: Survey and comparison in five major Asian cities," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 354-362.
    6. Tharinya Supasa & Shu-San Hsiau & Shih-Mo Lin & Wongkot Wongsapai & Jiunn-Chi Wu, 2017. "Household Energy Consumption Behaviour for Different Demographic Regions in Thailand from 2000 to 2010," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-22, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Keigo Miyamoto & Sri Novianthi Pratiwi & Shuntaro Nishiiri & Hiroto Takaguchi & Tetsu Kubota, 2024. "Relationship between Cooling Methods and Energy Consumption for the Development of Low-Carbon Collective Housing in Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-17, February.
    2. Marlena Piekut, 2021. "The Consumption of Renewable Energy Sources (RES) by the European Union Households between 2004 and 2019," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-31, September.
    3. Maria Christina Gudrun Hart & Michael Hans Breitner, 2022. "Fostering Energy Resilience in the Rural Thai Power System—A Case Study in Nakhon Phanom," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-20, October.
    4. Juan Sebastian Roncancio & José Vuelvas & Diego Patino & Carlos Adrián Correa-Flórez, 2022. "Flower Greenhouse Energy Management to Offer Local Flexibility Markets," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-20, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Spandagos, Constantine & Baark, Erik & Ng, Tze Ling & Yarime, Masaru, 2021. "Social influence and economic intervention policies to save energy at home: Critical questions for the new decade and evidence from air-condition use," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    2. Ozarisoy, B. & Altan, H., 2022. "Significance of occupancy patterns and habitual household adaptive behaviour on home-energy performance of post-war social-housing estate in the South-eastern Mediterranean climate: Energy policy desi," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 244(PB).
    3. Aldubyan, Mohammad & Krarti, Moncef, 2022. "Impact of stay home living on energy demand of residential buildings: Saudi Arabian case study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(PA).
    4. Spandagos, Constantine & Yarime, Masaru & Baark, Erik & Ng, Tze Ling, 2020. "“Triple Target” policy framework to influence household energy behavior: Satisfy, strengthen, include," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).
    5. Bianchi, Carlo & Zhang, Liang & Goldwasser, David & Parker, Andrew & Horsey, Henry, 2020. "Modeling occupancy-driven building loads for large and diversified building stocks through the use of parametric schedules," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    6. Kabeya Clement Mulamba, 2020. "Relationship between education and households? electricity-saving behaviour in South Africa: A multilevel logistic analysis," ECONOMICS AND POLICY OF ENERGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2020(2), pages 51-74.
    7. Wang, Xia & Ding, Chao & Cai, Weiguang & Luo, Lizi & Chen, Mingman, 2021. "Identifying household cooling savings potential in the hot summer and cold winter climate zone in China: A stochastic demand frontier approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    8. Lo Basso, Gianluigi & de Santoli, Livio & Paiolo, Romano & Losi, Claudio, 2021. "The potential role of trans-critical CO2 heat pumps within a solar cooling system for building services: The hybridised system energy analysis by a dynamic simulation model," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 472-490.
    9. Małgorzata Sztorc, 2022. "The Implementation of the European Green Deal Strategy as a Challenge for Energy Management in the Face of the COVID-19 Pandemic," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-21, April.
    10. Kelly, Scott & Shipworth, Michelle & Shipworth, David & Gentry, Michael & Wright, Andrew & Pollitt, Michael & Crawford-Brown, Doug & Lomas, Kevin, 2013. "Predicting the diversity of internal temperatures from the English residential sector using panel methods," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 601-621.
    11. Anna Życzyńska & Dariusz Majerek & Zbigniew Suchorab & Agnieszka Żelazna & Václav Kočí & Robert Černý, 2021. "Improving the Energy Performance of Public Buildings Equipped with Individual Gas Boilers Due to Thermal Retrofitting," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-19, March.
    12. Krarti, Moncef & Aldubyan, Mohammad, 2021. "Mitigation analysis of water consumption for power generation and air conditioning of residential buildings: Case study of Saudi Arabia," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 290(C).
    13. Tom Elliott & Joachim Geske & Richard Green, 2022. "Business Models for Active Buildings," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-17, October.
    14. Gulshan Maqbool & Zulqarnain Haider, 2021. "The Impact of Individual Behavior on Household Energy Saving," Journal of Economic Impact, Science Impact Publishers, vol. 3(1), pages 39-46.
    15. Guo Li & Wenling Liu & Zhaohua Wang & Mengqi Liu, 2017. "An empirical examination of energy consumption, behavioral intention, and situational factors: evidence from Beijing," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 255(1), pages 507-524, August.
    16. Leila Luttenberger Marić & Hrvoje Keko & Marko Delimar, 2022. "The Role of Local Aggregator in Delivering Energy Savings to Household Consumers," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-27, April.
    17. Scott Kelly & Michael Pollitt & Doug Crawford-Brown, 2011. "Building performance evaluation and certification in the UK: a critical review of SAP?," Working Papers EPRG 1219, Energy Policy Research Group, Cambridge Judge Business School, University of Cambridge.
    18. Mohamed, Ahmed M.A. & Al-Habaibeh, Amin & Abdo, Hafez & Elabar, Sherifa, 2015. "Towards exporting renewable energy from MENA region to Europe: An investigation into domestic energy use and householders’ energy behaviour in Libya," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 247-262.
    19. Nieves García-de-Frutos & José Manuel Ortega-Egea & Javier Martínez-del-Río, 2018. "Anti-consumption for Environmental Sustainability: Conceptualization, Review, and Multilevel Research Directions," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 148(2), pages 411-435, March.
    20. Kelly, Scott & Crawford-Brown, Doug & Pollitt, Michael G., 2012. "Building performance evaluation and certification in the UK: Is SAP fit for purpose?," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(9), pages 6861-6878.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:14:p:5796-:d:386551. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.