IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i12p4812-d370572.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Improved Representation of Flow and Water Quality in a North-Eastern German Lowland Catchment by Combining Low-Frequency Monitored Data with Hydrological Modelling

Author

Listed:
  • Muhammad Waseem

    (Faculty of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, University of Rostock, 18051 Rostock, Germany)

  • Jannik Schilling

    (Faculty of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, University of Rostock, 18051 Rostock, Germany)

  • Frauke Kachholz

    (Faculty of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, University of Rostock, 18051 Rostock, Germany)

  • Jens Tränckner

    (Faculty of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, University of Rostock, 18051 Rostock, Germany)

Abstract

Achievements of good chemical and ecological status of groundwater (GW) and surface water (SW) bodies are currently challenged mainly due to poor identification and quantification of pollution sources. A high spatio-temporal hydrological and water quality monitoring of SW and GW bodies is the basis for a reliable assessment of water quality in a catchment. However, high spatio-temporal hydrological and water quality monitoring is expensive, laborious, and hard to accomplish. This study uses spatio-temporally low resolved monitored water quality and river discharge data in combination with integrated hydrological modelling to estimate the governing pollution pathways and identify potential transformation processes. A key task at the regarded lowland river Augraben is (i) to understand the SW and GW interactions by estimating representative GW zones (GWZ) based on simulated GW flow directions and GW quality monitoring stations, (ii) to quantify GW flows to the Augraben River and its tributaries, and (iii) to simulate SW discharges at ungauged locations. Based on simulated GW flows and SW discharges, NO 3 -N, NO 2 -N, NH 4 -N, and P loads are calculated from each defined SW tributary outlet (SWTO) and respective GWZ by using low-frequency monitored SW and GW quality data. The magnitudes of NO 3 -N transformations and plant uptake rates are accessed by estimating a NO 3 -N balance at the catchment outlet. Based on sensitivity analysis results, Manning’s roughness, saturated hydraulic conductivity, and boundary conditions are mainly used for calibration. The water balance results show that 60–65% of total precipitation is lost via evapotranspiration (ET). A total of 85–95% of SW discharge in Augraben River and its tributaries is fed by GW via base flow. SW NO 3 -N loads are mainly dependent on GW flows and GW quality. Estimated SW NO 3 -N loads at SWTO_Ivenack and SWTO_Lindenberg show that these tributaries are heavily polluted and contribute mainly to the total SW NO 3 -N loads at Augraben River catchment outlet (SWO_Gehmkow). SWTO_Hasseldorf contributes least to the total SW NO 3 -N loads. SW quality of Augraben River catchment lies, on average, in the category of heavily polluted river with a maximum NO 3 -N load of 650 kg/d in 2017. Estimated GW loads in GWZ_Ivenack have contributed approximately 96% of the total GW loads and require maximum water quality improvement efforts to reduce high NO 3 -N levels. By focusing on the impacts of NO 3 -N reduction measures and best agricultural practices, further studies can enhance the better agricultural and water quality management in the study area.

Suggested Citation

  • Muhammad Waseem & Jannik Schilling & Frauke Kachholz & Jens Tränckner, 2020. "Improved Representation of Flow and Water Quality in a North-Eastern German Lowland Catchment by Combining Low-Frequency Monitored Data with Hydrological Modelling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-26, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:12:p:4812-:d:370572
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/12/4812/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/12/4812/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Till Kuhn, 2017. "The revision of the German Fertiliser Ordinance in 2017," Discussion Papers 262054, University of Bonn, Institute for Food and Resource Economics.
    2. Hesse, Cornelia & Krysanova, Valentina & Päzolt, Jens & Hattermann, Fred F., 2008. "Eco-hydrological modelling in a highly regulated lowland catchment to find measures for improving water quality," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 218(1), pages 135-148.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zelalem Abera Angello & Beshah M. Behailu & Jens Tränckner, 2020. "Integral Application of Chemical Mass Balance and Watershed Model to Estimate Point and Nonpoint Source Pollutant Loads in Data-Scarce Little Akaki River, Ethiopia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-18, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Y. Yang & L. Wang, 2010. "A Review of Modelling Tools for Implementation of the EU Water Framework Directive in Handling Diffuse Water Pollution," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 24(9), pages 1819-1843, July.
    2. Panagopoulos, Y. & Makropoulos, C. & Baltas, E. & Mimikou, M., 2011. "SWAT parameterization for the identification of critical diffuse pollution source areas under data limitations," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(19), pages 3500-3512.
    3. Ferrant, Sylvain & Durand, Patrick & Justes, Eric & Probst, Jean-Luc & Sanchez-Perez, José-Miguel, 2013. "Simulating the long term impact of nitrate mitigation scenarios in a pilot study basin," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 85-96.
    4. Li, Y.P. & Huang, G.H. & Zhang, N. & Nie, S.L., 2011. "An inexact-stochastic with recourse model for developing regional economic-ecological sustainability under uncertainty," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(2), pages 370-379.
    5. Hesse, Cornelia & Krysanova, Valentina & Vetter, Tobias & Reinhardt, Julia, 2013. "Comparison of several approaches representing terrestrial and in-stream nutrient retention and decomposition in watershed modelling," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 269(C), pages 70-85.
    6. Venus, Terese E. & Strauss, Felix & Venus, Thomas J. & Sauer, Johannes, 2021. "Understanding stakeholder preferences for future biogas development in Germany," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    7. Huang, Shaochun & Hesse, Cornelia & Krysanova, Valentina & Hattermann, Fred, 2009. "From meso- to macro-scale dynamic water quality modelling for the assessment of land use change scenarios," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(19), pages 2543-2558.
    8. Yan, Renhua & Gao, Junfeng, 2021. "Key factors affecting discharge, soil erosion, nitrogen and phosphorus exports from agricultural polder," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 452(C).
    9. Lenz-Wiedemann, V.I.S. & Klar, C.W. & Schneider, K., 2010. "Development and test of a crop growth model for application within a Global Change decision support system," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 221(2), pages 314-329.
    10. Kuhn, T. & Enders, A. & Gaiser, T. & Schäfer, D. & Srivastava, A.K. & Britz, W., 2020. "Coupling crop and bio-economic farm modelling to evaluate the revised fertilization regulations in Germany," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    11. Pahmeyer, Christoph & Kuhn, Till & Britz, Wolfgang, 2020. "‘Fruchtfolge’: A crop rotation decision support system for optimizing cropping choices with big data and spatially explicit modeling," Discussion Papers 305287, University of Bonn, Institute for Food and Resource Economics.
    12. Schaefer, David & Britz, Wolfgang & Kuhn, Till, 2020. "Modelling policy induced manure transports at large scale using an agent-based simulation model," Discussion Papers 305270, University of Bonn, Institute for Food and Resource Economics.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:12:p:4812-:d:370572. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.