IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i10p4290-d362309.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Application of the Fuzzy Delphi Method and Fuzzy AHP on the Discussion of Training Indicators for the Regional Competition, Taiwan National Skills Competition, in the Trade of Joinery

Author

Listed:
  • Hao-Chang Tsai

    (Program of Agriculture Science, National Chiayi University, Chiayi City 60004, Taiwan (R.O.C.))

  • An-Sheng Lee

    (Department of Wood-Based Materials and Design, National Chiayi University, Chiayi City 60004, Taiwan (R.O.C.))

  • Huang-Ning Lee

    (Department of Food and Beverage Management, TOKO University, Chiayi County 61363, Taiwan (R.O.C.))

  • Chien-Nan Chen

    (Department of Wood Science and Design, National Panting University of Science and Technology, Pingtung 91201, Taiwan)

  • Yu-Chun Liu

    (Program of Agriculture Science, National Chiayi University, Chiayi City 60004, Taiwan (R.O.C.))

Abstract

The importance of vocational training and capacity assessment has grown since the 1980s. Vocational education is an important foundation for societal and economic development. Therefore, it is crucial to develop vocational training and education that meet the demands of the labor market. Modern industrial structure is different from that of the past, creating an imbalance in the supply and demand of the labor force. The purpose of the Skills Competition (the collective term for the regional competition under the Taiwan National Skills Competition in this research) is to encourage the young generation to participate in vocational education and training, thereby further improving the effect and efficiency of learning and training. In order to develop suitable indicators for the joinery trade of the regional competition, Taiwan National Skills Competition (hereinafter referred to as the Regional Competition), we first identify the level of importance of each indicator. Firstly, this study formed a hierarchical structure via the fuzzy Delphi method (FDM) with six training indicators (drawings, internal and external joints, assembly, measurements, finishing and appearance, and application of materials), and 27 sub-indicators were developed on the basis of these six major indicators. Secondly, in order to develop suitable training indicators for the joinery trade of the Regional Competition, the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (fuzzy AHP) was adopted to seek the relative weight value of each indicator by assessing subjects through a paired-comparison. The results show that, among the six indicators, the relative weight value of measurements was the highest, followed by finishing and appearance and drawings. The indicators with higher relative weight value, such as measurement and finishing and appearance, should be paid more attention during the training processes. It is hoped that these results be presented to the trainers or instructors of training institutions or vocational schools as a reference to improve their training models, strategies, and quality.

Suggested Citation

  • Hao-Chang Tsai & An-Sheng Lee & Huang-Ning Lee & Chien-Nan Chen & Yu-Chun Liu, 2020. "An Application of the Fuzzy Delphi Method and Fuzzy AHP on the Discussion of Training Indicators for the Regional Competition, Taiwan National Skills Competition, in the Trade of Joinery," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-19, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:10:p:4290-:d:362309
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/10/4290/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/10/4290/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yoram Wind & Thomas L. Saaty, 1980. "Marketing Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(7), pages 641-658, July.
    2. Thomas L. Saaty & Luis G. Vargas, 2012. "Models, Methods, Concepts & Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process," International Series in Operations Research and Management Science, Springer, edition 2, number 978-1-4614-3597-6, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hwai-Hui Fu & Yan-Yu Chen & Guan-Jie Wang, 2020. "Using a Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process to Formulate an Effectual Tea Assessment System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-15, July.
    2. Dominika Siwiec & Andrzej Pacana, 2021. "Model Supporting Development Decisions by Considering Qualitative–Environmental Aspects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-28, August.
    3. Azemeraw Tadesse Mengistu & Roberto Panizzolo, 2021. "Indicators and Framework for Measuring Industrial Sustainability in Italian Footwear Small and Medium Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-20, May.
    4. Rakan Alyamani & Suzanna Long, 2020. "The Application of Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process in Sustainable Project Selection," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-16, October.
    5. Mohammed Abdul-Rahman & Wale Alade & Shahnawaz Anwer, 2023. "A Composite Resilience Index (CRI) for Developing Resilience and Sustainability in University Towns," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-27, February.
    6. Teen-Hang Meen & Charles Tijus & Jui-Che Tu, 2020. "Selected Papers from the Eurasian Conference on Educational Innovation 2020," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-5, July.
    7. Robert Ulewicz & Dominika Siwiec & Andrzej Pacana & Magdalena Tutak & Jarosław Brodny, 2021. "Multi-Criteria Method for the Selection of Renewable Energy Sources in the Polish Industrial Sector," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-30, April.
    8. Antonio Francisco Roldán López de Hierro & Miguel Sánchez & Daniel Puente-Fernández & Rafael Montoya-Juárez & Concepción Roldán, 2021. "A Fuzzy Delphi Consensus Methodology Based on a Fuzzy Ranking," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(18), pages 1-18, September.
    9. Ying Zhu & Jicong Tan & Yan Cao & Yalin Liu & Yanzheng Liu & Qian Zhang & Quan Liu, 2022. "Application of Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process in Environmental Economics Education: Under the Online and Offline Blended Teaching Mode," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-11, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Md Monjurul Islam & Tofael Ahamed & Ryozo Noguchi, 2018. "Land Suitability and Insurance Premiums: A GIS-based Multicriteria Analysis Approach for Sustainable Rice Production," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-28, May.
    2. Tasneem Bani-Mustafa & Nicola Pedroni & Enrico Zio & Dominique Vasseur & Francois Beaudouin, 2020. "A hierarchical tree-based decision-making approach for assessing the relative trustworthiness of risk assessment models," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 234(6), pages 748-763, December.
    3. Md. Arif Chowdhury & Hasnat Sabrina & Rashed Uz Zzaman & Syed Labib Ul Islam, 2022. "Green building aspects in Bangladesh: A study based on experts opinion regarding climate change," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(7), pages 9260-9284, July.
    4. Uroš Kramar & Dejan Dragan & Darja Topolšek, 2019. "The Holistic Approach to Urban Mobility Planning with a Modified Focus Group, SWOT, and Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchical Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-29, November.
    5. Liu Fang & Peng Yanan & Zhang Weiguo & Pedrycz Witold, 2017. "On Consistency in AHP and Fuzzy AHP," Journal of Systems Science and Information, De Gruyter, vol. 5(2), pages 128-147, April.
    6. Daeryong Park & Myoung-Jin Um, 2018. "Robust Decision-Making Technique for Strategic Environment Assessment with Deficient Information," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 32(15), pages 4953-4970, December.
    7. May, Jerrold H. & Shang, Jennifer & Tjader, Youxu Cai & Vargas, Luis G., 2013. "A new methodology for sensitivity and stability analysis of analytic network models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 224(1), pages 180-188.
    8. Tiffany Hutcheson & Graeme Newell, 2018. "Decision-making in property Investment by Property Fund Managers," ERES eres2018_295, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
    9. Vahid Karimi & Ezatollah Karami & Shobeir Karami & Marzieh Keshavarz, 2021. "Adaptation to climate change through agricultural paradigm shift," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 5465-5485, April.
    10. Liquete, Camino & Udias, Angel & Conte, Giulio & Grizzetti, Bruna & Masi, Fabio, 2016. "Integrated valuation of a nature-based solution for water pollution control. Highlighting hidden benefits," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 22(PB), pages 392-401.
    11. Billal Hossen & Helmut Yabar & Takeshi Mizunoya, 2021. "Land Suitability Assessment for Pulse (Green Gram) Production through Remote Sensing, GIS and Multicriteria Analysis in the Coastal Region of Bangladesh," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-24, November.
    12. Özge Şahin Zorluoğlu & Özgür Kabak, 2020. "Weighted Cumulative Belief Degree Approach for Project Portfolio Selection," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 29(4), pages 679-722, August.
    13. Zanardo, Rafael Petri & Siluk, Julio Cezar Mairesse & de Souza Savian, Fernando & Schneider, Paulo Smith, 2018. "Energy audit model based on a performance evaluation system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 544-552.
    14. Kulisic, Biljana & Dimitriou, Ioannis & Mola-Yudego, Blas, 2021. "From preferences to concerted policy on mandated share for renewable energy in transport," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    15. J. Claver & A. García-Domínguez & M. A. Sebastián, 2018. "Decision-Making Methodologies for Reuse of Industrial Assets," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2018, pages 1-17, February.
    16. Mustafa Topuz & Mehmet Deniz, 2023. "Application of GIS and AHP for land use suitability analysis: case of Demirci district (Turkey)," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-15, December.
    17. M. Gabriela Sava & Luis G. Vargas & Jerrold H. May & James G. Dolan, 2022. "Multi-dimensional stability analysis for Analytic Network Process models," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 316(2), pages 1401-1424, September.
    18. Anna Roccati & Guido Paliaga & Fabio Luino & Francesco Faccini & Laura Turconi, 2021. "GIS-Based Landslide Susceptibility Mapping for Land Use Planning and Risk Assessment," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-28, February.
    19. Derya Ozturk & Nergiz Uzel-Gunini, 2022. "Investigation of the effects of hybrid modeling approaches, factor standardization, and categorical mapping on the performance of landslide susceptibility mapping in Van, Turkey," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 114(3), pages 2571-2604, December.
    20. Eshtaiwi, Mohamed & Badi, Ibrahim & Abdulshahed, Ali & Erkan, Turan Erman, 2018. "Determination of key performance indicators for measuring airport success: A case study in Libya," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 28-34.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:10:p:4290-:d:362309. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.