IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i10p4256-d361618.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Learning Management System-Based Evaluation to Determine Academic Efficiency Performance

Author

Listed:
  • Brenda Juárez Santiago

    (Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Internacional Iberoamericana, Campeche 24560, Mexico
    Ingeniería, Universidad Tecnológica de San Juan del Río, Querétaro 76800, Mexico
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Juan Manuel Olivares Ramírez

    (Ingeniería, Universidad Tecnológica de San Juan del Río, Querétaro 76800, Mexico
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Juvenal Rodríguez-Reséndiz

    (Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Autónoma de Querétaro, Querétaro 76010, Mexico
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Andrés Dector

    (CONACYT–Universidad Tecnológica de San Juan del Río, Querétaro 76800, Mexico
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Raúl García García

    (Ingeniería, Universidad Tecnológica de San Juan del Río, Querétaro 76800, Mexico
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • José Eli Eduardo González-Durán

    (Instituto Tecnológico Superior del Sur de Guanajuato, Guanajuato 38980, Mexico
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Fermín Ferriol Sánchez

    (Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Internacional Iberoamericana, Campeche 24560, Mexico
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

Abstract

At present, supporting e-learning with interactive virtual campuses is a future goal in education. Models that measure the levels of acceptance, performance, and academic efficiency have been recently developed. In light of the above, we carried out a study to evaluate a model for which architecture design, configuration, metadata, and statistical coefficients were obtained using four Learning Management Systems (LMSs). That allowed us to determine reliability, accuracy, and correlation, using and integrating the factors that other researchers have previously used, only using isolated models, such as Anxiety–Innovation (AI), Utility and Use (UU), Tools Learning (TL), System Factors (SF), Access Strategies (AS), Virtual Library (VL), and Mobile Use (MU). The research was conducted over one year in nine groups. The results from an LMS Classroom, architecturally and configuration-wise, had the highest level of performance, with an average of 73% when evaluated using statistical coefficients. The LMS Classroom had a good acceptance and a greater impact: SF, 82%, AI, 80%, and VL, 43%, while out of the seven factors, those with the most significant impact on academic efficiency were TL, 80%, VL, 82%, and MU, 85%.

Suggested Citation

  • Brenda Juárez Santiago & Juan Manuel Olivares Ramírez & Juvenal Rodríguez-Reséndiz & Andrés Dector & Raúl García García & José Eli Eduardo González-Durán & Fermín Ferriol Sánchez, 2020. "Learning Management System-Based Evaluation to Determine Academic Efficiency Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-17, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:10:p:4256-:d:361618
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/10/4256/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/10/4256/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lee Cronbach, 1951. "Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 16(3), pages 297-334, September.
    2. Gary C. Moore & Izak Benbasat, 1991. "Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 2(3), pages 192-222, September.
    3. Wunong Zhang & Yuxin Wang & Lili Yang & Chuanyi Wang, 2020. "Suspending Classes Without Stopping Learning: China’s Education Emergency Management Policy in the COVID-19 Outbreak," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-6, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kui Yi & Pingping Li, 2022. "Zero Waste Scientific Research Evaluation: The Scientific Research Evaluation System Framework to Stimulate Scholars’ Empathy and Innovation Intention," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-24, October.
    2. Ming Li & Xixi Liu & Zhonggen Yu, 2023. "Students' Emotional Perceptions and Attitudes Toward English Teacher Feedback in Cloud Classroom Learning Environments During the COVID-19 Pandemic," International Journal of Online Pedagogy and Course Design (IJOPCD), IGI Global, vol. 13(1), pages 1-17, January.
    3. Aljawharah M. Aldosari & Hala F. Eid & Yi-Ping Phoebe Chen, 2022. "A Proposed Strategy Based on Instructional Design Models through an LMS to Develop Online Learning in Higher Education Considering the Lockdown Period of the COVID-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-14, June.
    4. Eduard Edelhauser & Lucian Lupu-Dima, 2020. "Is Romania Prepared for eLearning during the COVID-19 Pandemic?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-30, July.
    5. Cristina Dimulescu, 2023. "E-Learning Platform Usage and Acceptance of Technology after the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Case of Transilvania University," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-26, November.
    6. Sálvora Feliz & María-Carmen Ricoy & Juan-Andrés Buedo & Tiberio Feliz-Murias, 2022. "Students’ E-Learning Domestic Space in Higher Education in the New Normal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-15, June.
    7. Seren Başaran & Kowther Abdikarin Hussein, 2023. "Determinants of University Students’ Intention to Use Video Conferencing Tools during COVID-19 Pandemic: Case of Somalia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-22, January.
    8. Charles Darko, 2021. "An Evaluation of How Students Use Blackboard and the Possible Link to Their Grades," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, December.
    9. Lourdes Vital-López & Raul García-García & Juvenal Rodríguez-Reséndíz & Willfrido Jacobo Paredes-García & Marco Antonio Zamora-Antuñano & Temidayo Oluyomi-Elufisan & Hugo Rodríguez Reséndiz & Ana Ruth, 2022. "The Impacts of COVID-19 on Technological and Polytechnic University Teachers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-27, April.
    10. Marco Antonio Zamora-Antuñano & Juvenal Rodríguez-Reséndiz & Leticia Rodriguez Segura & Miguel Ángel Cruz Pérez & José Antonio Altamirano Corro & Wilfrido J. Paredes-Garcia & Hugo Rodríguez-Reséndiz, 2021. "Analysis of Emergency Remote Education in COVID-19 Crisis Focused on the Perception of the Teachers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-19, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Qingyu & Vonderembse, Mark A. & Cao, Mei, 2009. "Product concept and prototype flexibility in manufacturing: Implications for customer satisfaction," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 194(1), pages 143-154, April.
    2. Chen Wei, 2021. "The influence of Consumers’ Purchase intention on Smart Wearable Device: A study of Consumers in East China," International Journal of Science and Business, IJSAB International, vol. 5(8), pages 46-72.
    3. Seok Chan Jeong & Beom-Jin Choi, 2022. "Moderating Effects of Consumers’ Personal Innovativeness on the Adoption and Purchase Intention of Wearable Devices," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(4), pages 21582440221, November.
    4. Kunal Mohan & Frederik Ahlemann & Jessica Braun, 2016. "Realising value from projects: a performance-based analysis of determinants of successful realisation of project benefits," International Journal of Project Organisation and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 8(1), pages 1-23.
    5. Hsu, Chin-Lung & Lu, Hsi-Peng & Hsu, Huei-Hsia, 2007. "Adoption of the mobile Internet: An empirical study of multimedia message service (MMS)," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 35(6), pages 715-726, December.
    6. Pei Yee Chin & Nina Evans & Charles Zhechao Liu & Kim-Kwang Raymond Choo, 2020. "Understanding Factors Influencing Employees’ Consumptive and Contributive Use of Enterprise Social Networks," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 22(6), pages 1357-1376, December.
    7. Pei Yee Chin & Nina Evans & Charles Zhechao Liu & Kim-Kwang Raymond Choo, 0. "Understanding Factors Influencing Employees’ Consumptive and Contributive Use of Enterprise Social Networks," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-20.
    8. Anjuli Franz & Alexander Benlian, 2022. "Exploring interdependent privacy – Empirical insights into users’ protection of others’ privacy on online platforms," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(4), pages 2293-2309, December.
    9. Allam, Hesham & Bliemel, Michael & Spiteri, Louise & Blustein, James & Ali-Hassan, Hossam, 2019. "Applying a multi-dimensional hedonic concept of intrinsic motivation on social tagging tools: A theoretical model and empirical validation," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 211-222.
    10. Segars, A. H., 1997. "Assessing the unidimensionality of measurement: a paradigm and illustration within the context of information systems research," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 25(1), pages 107-121, February.
    11. Leroux, Erick & Pupion, Pierre-Charles, 2022. "Smart territories and IoT adoption by local authorities: A question of trust, efficiency, and relationship with the citizen-user-taxpayer," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    12. Mahmud Akhter Shareef & Vinod Kumar & Yogesh K. Dwivedi & Uma Kumar, 2016. "Service delivery through mobile-government (mGov): Driving factors and cultural impacts," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 315-332, April.
    13. Wong, Christina W.Y. & Wong, Chee Yew & Boon-itt, Sakun, 2013. "The combined effects of internal and external supply chain integration on product innovation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(2), pages 566-574.
    14. Wallbach, Sören, 2020. "Assimilation and Diffusion of Multi-Sided Platforms in Dynamic B2B Networks: Inhibiting Factors and Their Consequences," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 123277, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    15. Lingming Chen & Md. Salamun Rashidin & Fei Song & Yi Wang & Sara Javed & Jian Wang, 2021. "Determinants of Consumer’s Purchase Intention on Fresh E-Commerce Platform: Perspective of UTAUT Model," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(2), pages 21582440211, June.
    16. Alexander Mayr & Philip Stahmann & Maximilian Nebel & Christian Janiesch, 2024. "Still doing it yourself? Investigating determinants for the adoption of intelligent process automation," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 34(1), pages 1-22, December.
    17. Sepasgozar, Samad M.E. & Hawken, Scott & Sargolzaei, Sharifeh & Foroozanfa, Mona, 2019. "Implementing citizen centric technology in developing smart cities: A model for predicting the acceptance of urban technologies," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 105-116.
    18. Zelin Zhuo & Frank Okai Larbi & Eric Osei Addo, 2021. "Benefits and Risks of Introducing Artificial Intelligence Into Trade and Commerce: The Case of Manufacturing Companies in West Africa," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 23(56), pages 174-174, February.
    19. Maurice Kügler & Sven Dittes & Stefan Smolnik & Alexander Richter, 2015. "Connect Me! Antecedents and Impact of Social Connectedness in Enterprise Social Software," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 57(3), pages 181-196, June.
    20. Jan Krämer & Lukas Wiewiorra, 2015. "When ‘Just’ is Just Not Enough," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 57(5), pages 325-338, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:10:p:4256-:d:361618. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.