IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i9p2681-d230139.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rapid Simulation of Optimally Responsive Façade during Schematic Design Phases: Use of a New Hybrid Metaheuristic Algorithm

Author

Listed:
  • Hwang Yi

    (Architectural Design & Technology Lab, Department of Architecture, Ajou University, Suwon 16499, Korea)

  • Mi-Jin Kim

    (Architectural Design & Technology Lab, Department of Architecture, Ajou University, Suwon 16499, Korea)

  • Yuri Kim

    (Architectural Design & Technology Lab, Department of Architecture, Ajou University, Suwon 16499, Korea)

  • Sun-Sook Kim

    (Department of Architecture, College of Engineering, Ajou University, Suwon 16499, Korea)

  • Kyu-In Lee

    (Department of Architecture, College of Engineering, Ajou University, Suwon 16499, Korea)

Abstract

Operation of environmentally responsive building components requires rapid prediction of the optimal adaptation of geometric shapes and positions, and such responsive configuration needs to be identified during the design process as early as possible. However, building simulation practices to characterize optimized shapes of various geometric design candidates are limited by complex simulation procedures, slow optimization, and lack of site information. This study suggests a practical approach to the design of responsive building façades by integrating on-site sensors, building performance simulation (BPS), machine-learning, and 3D geometry modeling on a unified design interface. To this end, a novel and efficient hybrid optimization algorithm, tabu-based adaptive pattern search simulated annealing (T-APSSA), was developed and integrated with wireless sensor data communication (using nRF24L01 and ESP8266 WiFi modules) on a parametric visual programming language (VPL) interface Rhino Grasshopper (0.9.0076, McNeel, Seattle, USA). The effectiveness of T-APSSA for early-stage BPS and optimal design is compared with other metaheuristic algorithms, and the proposed framework is validated by experimental optimal envelope (window shading) designs for single (daylight) and multiple (daylight and energy) objectives. Test results demonstrate the improved efficiency of T-APSSA in calculations (two to four times faster than other algorithms). This T-APSSA-integrated sensor-enabled design optimization practice supports rapid BPS and digital prototyping of responsive building façade design.

Suggested Citation

  • Hwang Yi & Mi-Jin Kim & Yuri Kim & Sun-Sook Kim & Kyu-In Lee, 2019. "Rapid Simulation of Optimally Responsive Façade during Schematic Design Phases: Use of a New Hybrid Metaheuristic Algorithm," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-28, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:9:p:2681-:d:230139
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/9/2681/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/9/2681/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Al-Obaidi, Karam M. & Azzam Ismail, Muhammad & Hussein, Hazreena & Abdul Rahman, Abdul Malik, 2017. "Biomimetic building skins: An adaptive approach," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 1472-1491.
    2. Fakra, A.H. & Boyer, H. & Miranville, F. & Bigot, D., 2011. "A simple evaluation of global and diffuse luminous efficacy for all sky conditions in tropical and humid climate," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 298-306.
    3. Nguyen, Anh-Tuan & Reiter, Sigrid & Rigo, Philippe, 2014. "A review on simulation-based optimization methods applied to building performance analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1043-1058.
    4. Dong-Seok Lee & Sung-Han Koo & Yoon-Bok Seong & Jae-Hun Jo, 2016. "Evaluating Thermal and Lighting Energy Performance of Shading Devices on Kinetic Façades," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-18, September.
    5. López, Marlén & Rubio, Ramón & Martín, Santiago & Ben Croxford,, 2017. "How plants inspire façades. From plants to architecture: Biomimetic principles for the development of adaptive architectural envelopes," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 692-703.
    6. Hedar, Abdel-Rahman & Fukushima, Masao, 2006. "Tabu Search directed by direct search methods for nonlinear global optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 170(2), pages 329-349, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gonçalves, M. & Figueiredo, A. & Almeida, R.M.S.F. & Vicente, R., 2024. "Dynamic façades in buildings: A systematic review across thermal comfort, energy efficiency and daylight performance," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    2. Hwang Yi, 2020. "Visualized Co-Simulation of Adaptive Human Behavior and Dynamic Building Performance: An Agent-Based Model (ABM) and Artificial Intelligence (AI) Approach for Smart Architectural Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-18, August.
    3. Jungwon Yoon & Sanghyun Bae, 2020. "Performance Evaluation and Design of Thermo-Responsive SMP Shading Prototypes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-35, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jungwon Yoon & Sanghyun Bae, 2020. "Performance Evaluation and Design of Thermo-Responsive SMP Shading Prototypes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-35, May.
    2. Sommese, Francesco & Badarnah, Lidia & Ausiello, Gigliola, 2023. "Smart materials for biomimetic building envelopes: current trends and potential applications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    3. Yuta Uchiyama & Eduardo Blanco & Ryo Kohsaka, 2020. "Application of Biomimetics to Architectural and Urban Design: A Review across Scales," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-15, November.
    4. Benedek Kiss & Jose Dinis Silvestre & Rita Andrade Santos & Zsuzsa Szalay, 2021. "Environmental and Economic Optimisation of Buildings in Portugal and Hungary," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-19, December.
    5. Guariso, Giorgio & Sangiorgio, Matteo, 2019. "Multi-objective planning of building stock renovation," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 101-110.
    6. Sun, Alexander Y., 2020. "Optimal carbon storage reservoir management through deep reinforcement learning," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).
    7. Waibel, Christoph & Evins, Ralph & Carmeliet, Jan, 2019. "Co-simulation and optimization of building geometry and multi-energy systems: Interdependencies in energy supply, energy demand and solar potentials," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C), pages 1661-1682.
    8. Kokaraki, Nikoleta & Hopfe, Christina J. & Robinson, Elaine & Nikolaidou, Elli, 2019. "Testing the reliability of deterministic multi-criteria decision-making methods using building performance simulation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 991-1007.
    9. Ivorra, Benjamin & Mohammadi, Bijan & Manuel Ramos, Angel, 2015. "A multi-layer line search method to improve the initialization of optimization algorithms," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 247(3), pages 711-720.
    10. Schlereth, Christian & Stepanchuk, Tanja & Skiera, Bernd, 2010. "Optimization and analysis of the profitability of tariff structures with two-part tariffs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 206(3), pages 691-701, November.
    11. Ascione, Fabrizio & De Masi, Rosa Francesca & de Rossi, Filippo & Ruggiero, Silvia & Vanoli, Giuseppe Peter, 2016. "Optimization of building envelope design for nZEBs in Mediterranean climate: Performance analysis of residential case study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 938-957.
    12. Tian, Wei & Song, Jitian & Li, Zhanyong & de Wilde, Pieter, 2014. "Bootstrap techniques for sensitivity analysis and model selection in building thermal performance analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 320-328.
    13. Azad, Abdus Salam & Rakshit, Dibakar & Patil, K.N., 2018. "Model development and evaluation of global and diffuse luminous efficacy for humid sub-tropical region," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 375-387.
    14. Fernandes, Marco S. & Rodrigues, Eugénio & Gaspar, Adélio Rodrigues & Costa, José J. & Gomes, Álvaro, 2019. "The impact of thermal transmittance variation on building design in the Mediterranean region," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(C), pages 581-597.
    15. Niemelä, Tuomo & Kosonen, Risto & Jokisalo, Juha, 2016. "Cost-optimal energy performance renovation measures of educational buildings in cold climate," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 1005-1020.
    16. Hvattum, Lars Magnus & Glover, Fred, 2009. "Finding local optima of high-dimensional functions using direct search methods," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 195(1), pages 31-45, May.
    17. M. Bierlaire & M. Thémans & N. Zufferey, 2010. "A Heuristic for Nonlinear Global Optimization," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 22(1), pages 59-70, February.
    18. Chang-Yong Lee & Dongju Lee, 2014. "Determination of initial temperature in fast simulated annealing," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 58(2), pages 503-522, June.
    19. Eva Lucas Segarra & Germán Ramos Ruiz & Vicente Gutiérrez González & Antonis Peppas & Carlos Fernández Bandera, 2020. "Impact Assessment for Building Energy Models Using Observed vs. Third-Party Weather Data Sets," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-27, August.
    20. Tatchell-Evans, Morgan & Kapur, Nik & Summers, Jonathan & Thompson, Harvey & Oldham, Dan, 2017. "An experimental and theoretical investigation of the extent of bypass air within data centres employing aisle containment, and its impact on power consumption," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 186(P3), pages 457-469.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:9:p:2681-:d:230139. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.