IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i9p2493-d226758.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Benefits and Barriers for Promoting Bamboo as a Green Building Material in China—An Integrative Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Liyin Shen

    (School of Construction Management and Real Estate, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China
    International Research Center for Sustainable Built Environment, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China)

  • Junsi Yang

    (School of Construction Management and Real Estate, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China
    International Research Center for Sustainable Built Environment, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China)

  • Rong Zhang

    (School of Construction Management and Real Estate, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China
    International Research Center for Sustainable Built Environment, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China)

  • Changzhuan Shao

    (School of Architecture, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China)

  • Xiangnan Song

    (School of Management, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China)

Abstract

Bamboo is commonly considered as a green, environmentally friendly material. However, it appears that bamboo finds limited application in the form of green building materials in the Chinese construction sector. In order to explain this phenomenon and promote the material’s application, this study summarizes the benefits of applying bamboo materials and presents an analysis on barriers affecting the effective application of bamboo materials in this specific building sector. Research data are collected from both literature surveys and semi-structured interviews with a group of carefully selected experts from the Chinese building sector. Fifteen characteristic barriers are identified, such as ineffective action by government departments. An integrative analysis is conducted, including investigation on the hierarchy structure among characteristic barriers using the interpretive structural modeling (ISM) method and the classification of barriers from a driving-driven perspective using the Cross-impact Matrix Multiplication Applied to Classification (MICMAC) technique. This classification provides a different profile for the characteristic barriers from that of traditional barrier analysis methods. The findings provide valuable references for helping policy makers and practitioners adopt effective policies and measures to promote the application of bamboo for green materials in building sector.

Suggested Citation

  • Liyin Shen & Junsi Yang & Rong Zhang & Changzhuan Shao & Xiangnan Song, 2019. "The Benefits and Barriers for Promoting Bamboo as a Green Building Material in China—An Integrative Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-23, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:9:p:2493-:d:226758
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/9/2493/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/9/2493/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wang, GuoHong & Wang, YunXia & Zhao, Tao, 2008. "Analysis of interactions among the barriers to energy saving in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(6), pages 1879-1889, June.
    2. Edwin Zea Escamilla & Guillaume Habert & Juan Francisco Correal Daza & Hector F. Archilla & Juan Sebastian Echeverry Fernández & David Trujillo, 2018. "Industrial or Traditional Bamboo Construction? Comparative Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of Bamboo-Based Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-14, August.
    3. Corinna Salzer & Holger Wallbaum & Luis Felipe Lopez & Jean Luc Kouyoumji, 2016. "Sustainability of Social Housing in Asia: A Holistic Multi-Perspective Development Process for Bamboo-Based Construction in the Philippines," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-26, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kitti Chaowana & Supanit Wisadsatorn & Pannipa Chaowana, 2021. "Bamboo as a Sustainable Building Material—Culm Characteristics and Properties," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-18, July.
    2. Perry C. Y. Liu & Huai-Wei Lo & James J. H. Liou, 2020. "A Combination of DEMATEL and BWM-Based ANP Methods for Exploring the Green Building Rating System in Taiwan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-19, April.
    3. Amir Mofidi & Judith Abila & Jackson Tsz Ming Ng, 2020. "Novel Advanced Composite Bamboo Structural Members with Bio-Based and Synthetic Matrices for Sustainable Construction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-21, March.
    4. Piotr F. Borowski & Iaroslav Patuk & Erick R. Bandala, 2022. "Innovative Industrial Use of Bamboo as Key “Green” Material," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-13, February.
    5. Mahmoud Sodangi & Zaheer Abbas Kazmi, 2020. "Integrated Evaluation of the Impediments to the Adoption of Coconut Palm Wood as a Sustainable Material for Building Construction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-24, September.
    6. Zaheer Abbas Kazmi & Mahmoud Sodangi, 2021. "Integrated Analysis of the Geotechnical Factors Impeding Sustainable Building Construction—The Case of the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-18, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Eleni Eleftheriou & Luis Felipe Lopez Muñoz & Guillaume Habert & Edwin Zea Escamilla, 2022. "Parametric Approach to Simplified Life Cycle Assessment of Social Housing Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-15, June.
    2. Brian E. Bautista & Lessandro E. O. Garciano & Luis F. Lopez, 2021. "Comparative Analysis of Shear Strength Parallel to Fiber of Different Local Bamboo Species in the Philippines," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-21, July.
    3. Apriani Soepardi & Pratikto Pratikto & Purnomo Budi Santoso & Ishardita Pambudi Tama & Patrik Thollander, 2018. "Linking of Barriers to Energy Efficiency Improvement in Indonesia’s Steel Industry," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-22, January.
    4. Wuttipan Kiatruangkrai & Ekachai Leelarasmee, 2016. "Barriers to Energy Saving for Public Middle Schools in Bangkok: From School Management Perspective," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 6(3), pages 513-521.
    5. Mukisa, Nicholas & Zamora, Ramon & Lie, Tek Tjing, 2020. "Assessment of community sustainable livelihoods capitals for the implementation of alternative energy technologies in Uganda – Africa," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 886-902.
    6. Yuan, Chaoqing & Liu, Sifeng & Fang, Zhigeng & Wu, Junlong, 2009. "Research on the energy-saving effect of energy policies in China: 1982-2006," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(7), pages 2475-2480, July.
    7. Carmen de la Cruz-Lovera & Alberto-Jesus Perea-Moreno & José Luis de la Cruz-Fernández & Francisco G. Montoya & Alfredo Alcayde & Francisco Manzano-Agugliaro, 2019. "Analysis of Research Topics and Scientific Collaborations in Energy Saving Using Bibliometric Techniques and Community Detection," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-23, May.
    8. Bianka Shoai Tehrani & Pascal da Costa & Danièle Attias, 2016. "Three investment scenarios for future nuclear reactors in Europe," Post-Print hal-00997005, HAL.
    9. Heshmati, Almas, 2015. "A Review of the Circular Economy and its Implementation," IZA Discussion Papers 9611, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    10. Chen, Shuo-Pei & Wu, Wann-Yih, 2010. "A systematic procedure to evaluate an automobile manufacturer-distributor partnership," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 205(3), pages 687-698, September.
    11. Zhao, Xiaofan & Li, Huimin & Wu, Liang & Qi, Ye, 2014. "Implementation of energy-saving policies in China: How local governments assisted industrial enterprises in achieving energy-saving targets," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 170-184.
    12. El-Awady Attia & Ali Alarjani & Md. Sharif Uddin & Ahmed Farouk Kineber, 2023. "Determining the Stationary Enablers of Resilient and Sustainable Supply Chains," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-23, February.
    13. Naim Ahmad & Ayman Qahmash, 2021. "SmartISM: Implementation and Assessment of Interpretive Structural Modeling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-27, August.
    14. Ma, Hengyun & Oxley, Les & Gibson, John, 2010. "China's energy economy: A survey of the literature," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 105-132, June.
    15. Kaiya Wu & Shiping Tang & Min Tang, 2024. "Interpretative structural modeling to social sciences: designing better datasets for mixed method research," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 58(5), pages 4073-4092, October.
    16. Bianka Shoai Tehrani & Pascal Da Costa & Danièle Attias, 2014. "Three Investment Scenarios for Future Nuclear Reactors in Europe," Working Papers hal-00997005, HAL.
    17. Zhuyuan Xue & Hongbo Liu & Qinxiao Zhang & Jingxin Wang & Jilin Fan & Xia Zhou, 2019. "The Impact Assessment of Campus Buildings Based on a Life Cycle Assessment–Life Cycle Cost Integrated Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-24, December.
    18. Iker Etxano & Itziar Barinaga-Rementeria & Oihana Garcia, 2018. "Conflicting Values in Rural Planning: A Multifunctionality Approach through Social Multi-Criteria Evaluation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-29, May.
    19. He-Yau Kang & Meng-Chan Hung & W. L. Pearn & Amy H. I. Lee & Mei-Sung Kang, 2011. "An Integrated Multi-Criteria Decision Making Model for Evaluating Wind Farm Performance," Energies, MDPI, vol. 4(11), pages 1-25, November.
    20. Edwin Zea Escamilla & Guillaume Habert & Juan Francisco Correal Daza & Hector F. Archilla & Juan Sebastian Echeverry Fernández & David Trujillo, 2018. "Industrial or Traditional Bamboo Construction? Comparative Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of Bamboo-Based Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-14, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:9:p:2493-:d:226758. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.