IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i8p2196-d222167.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Where to Preserve? Evaluating the Integrity Principle for Delineating Protection Scopes of Kaiping Diaolou and Villages

Author

Listed:
  • Jie Yin

    (School of Urban Planning & Design, Peking University Shenzhen Graduate School, Shenzhen 518055, China
    College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China)

  • Xu Tang

    (School of Urban Planning & Design, Peking University Shenzhen Graduate School, Shenzhen 518055, China)

  • Wenjia Zhang

    (School of Urban Planning & Design, Peking University Shenzhen Graduate School, Shenzhen 518055, China)

  • Xiongfei Liang

    (Foshan Urban Planning and Design Institute, Foshan 528000, China)

  • Jiancheng Zhu

    (School of Urban Planning & Design, Peking University Shenzhen Graduate School, Shenzhen 518055, China)

Abstract

While establishing where to preserve in a world heritage site is critical for heritage protection, management and cultural sustainability, the approach to delineating protection scopes under the integrity principle remains less discussed in literature. This study explores a quantitative approach to evaluating the preservation scopes of the Kaiping Diaolou and Villages (KDVs), a world culture heritage in south China. Diaolous are multiple-story tower dwellings, originally built for defense purposes in the villages of Kaiping, with mixed Chinese and Western architectural styles. We investigate 1629 Diaolous with varying architectural and locational attributes and defensive functions for resisting invasion. We use a GIS-based analysis to identify the boundaries of defensive regions and then categorize them into four types, relying on principal component and clustering analysis. Results suggest that current protection scopes may overlook the spatial organization of Diaolous as a defensive system, failing to consider the cultural value of typology and boundary integrity. The delineation of protection scopes thus need to emphasize functional distribution and organization of historical buildings along with their architectural value.

Suggested Citation

  • Jie Yin & Xu Tang & Wenjia Zhang & Xiongfei Liang & Jiancheng Zhu, 2019. "Where to Preserve? Evaluating the Integrity Principle for Delineating Protection Scopes of Kaiping Diaolou and Villages," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-15, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:8:p:2196-:d:222167
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/8/2196/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/8/2196/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Meng Zhu & Jianfei Dong & Yingzhi Gao, 2019. "The Research on Temporal–Spatial Distribution and Morphological Characteristics of Ancient Settlements in the Songhua River Basin," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-12, February.
    2. Wenwu Du & Sofia M. Penabaz-Wiley & Anthony Murithi Njeru & Isami Kinoshita, 2015. "Models and Approaches for Integrating Protected Areas with Their Surroundings: A Review of the Literature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(7), pages 1-27, June.
    3. Paola Gullino & Gabriele Loris Beccaro & Federica Larcher, 2015. "Assessing and Monitoring the Sustainability in Rural World Heritage Sites," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(10), pages 1-25, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jie Yin & Xu Zhao & Wenjia Zhang & Pei Wang, 2020. "Rural Land Use Change Driven by Informal Industrialization: Evidence from Fengzhuang Village in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-17, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. František Petrovič & Martin Boltižiar & Iveta Rakytová & Ivana Tomčíková & Eva Pauditšová, 2021. "Long-Term Development Trend of the Historical Cultural Landscape of the UNESCO Monument: Vlkolínec (Slovakia)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-19, February.
    2. Paola Gullino & Maria Gabriella Mellano & Gabriele Loris Beccaro & Marco Devecchi & Federica Larcher, 2020. "Strategies for the Management of Traditional Chestnut Landscapes in Pesio Valley, Italy: A Participatory Approach," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-13, December.
    3. Paola Gullino & Luca Battisti & Federica Larcher, 2018. "Linking Multifunctionality and Sustainability for Valuing Peri-Urban Farming: A Case Study in the Turin Metropolitan Area (Italy)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-18, May.
    4. Bernadetta Zawilińska & Patrycja Brańka & Karol Majewski & Marcin Semczuk, 2021. "National Parks—Areas of Economic Development or Stagnation? Evidence from Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-24, October.
    5. Enrico Pomatto & Marco Devecchi & Federica Larcher, 2022. "Assessment of the Terraced Landscapes’ Integrity: A GIS-Based Approach in a Potential GIAHS-FAO Site (Northwest Piedmont, Italy)," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-21, December.
    6. Soonki Kim, 2016. "World Heritage Site Designation Impacts on a Historic Village: A Case Study on Residents’ Perceptions of Hahoe Village (Korea)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-16, March.
    7. Frontuto, Vito & Corsi, Alessandro & Novelli, Silvia & Gullino, Paola & Larcher, Federica, 2020. "The visual impact of agricultural sheds on rural landscapes: The willingness to pay for mitigation solutions and treatment effects," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    8. Enrico Pomatto & Paola Gullino & Silvia Novelli & Marco Devecchi & Federica Larcher, 2023. "Landscape Strategies for Terraced Landscapes in the European Alpine Region Using a Mixed-Method Analysis Tool," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-21, June.
    9. Wenwu Du & Sofia M Penabaz-Wiley & Isami Kinoshita, 2019. "Relationships between land use changes, stakeholders, and national scenic area administrations: A case study of Mount Jinfo and its surroundings in China," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 37(8), pages 1507-1530, December.
    10. Liang Chang & Teiji Watanabe & Hanlin Xu & Jiho Han, 2022. "Knowledge Mapping on Nepal’s Protected Areas Using CiteSpace and VOSviewer," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-23, July.
    11. Rosa Tamborrino & Mesut Dinler & Edoardo Patti & Alessandro Aliberti & Matteo Orlando & Claudia De Luca & Simona Tondelli & Zahra Amirzada & Irina Pavlova, 2022. "Engaging Users in Resource Ecosystem Building for Local Heritage-Led Knowledge," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-16, April.
    12. Julia Rey-Pérez & Victoria Domínguez-Ruiz, 2020. "Multidisciplinarity, Citizen Participation and Geographic Information System, Cross-Cutting Strategies for Sustainable Development in Rural Heritage. The Case Study of Valverde de Burguillos (Spain)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-27, November.
    13. Ntuli, Herbert & Muchapondwa, Edwin & Okumu, Boscow, 2020. "Can local communities afford full control over wildlife conservation? The case of Zimbabwe," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 37(C).
    14. Iuliana Vijulie & Ana-Irina Lequeux-Dincă & Mihaela Preda & Alina Mareci & Elena Matei & Roxana Cuculici & Ana-Maria Taloș, 2021. "Certeze Village: The Dilemma of Traditional vs. Post-Modern Architecture in Țara Oașului, Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-21, October.
    15. Mariane Paulina Batalha Roque & José Ambrósio Ferreira Neto & André Luiz Lopes Faria, 2022. "Degraded grassland and the conflict of land use in protected areas of hotspot in Brazil," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 1475-1492, January.
    16. Jonghyuk Kim & Hyunwoo Hwangbo & Sung Jun Kim & Soyean Kim, 2019. "Location-Based Tracking Data and Customer Movement Pattern Analysis for Sustainable Fashion Business," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-17, November.
    17. Jing Shen & Feng-Tzu Huang & Rung-Jiun Chou, 2021. "Agricultural-Heritage-Oriented Rural Revitalization: Experiences from the Ancient Tea Town of Xiping," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-15, September.
    18. Freitas Lima, Elizete Aparecida Checon & Ranieri, Victor Eduardo Lima, 2018. "Land use planning around protected areas: Case studies in four state parks in the Atlantic forest region of southeastern Brazil," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 453-458.
    19. Yufen Zhang & Hongfan Bu & Shengxi Cao & Xiongfei Zhao, 2021. "Performance-Based Design of a Main Exhibition Hall and Its Ecological Connectivity with Surroundings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-15, October.
    20. Carlos Santos-Iglesia & Pablo Fernández-Arias & Álvaro Antón-Sancho & Diego Vergara, 2022. "Energy Consumption of the Urban Transport Fleet in UNESCO World Heritage Sites: A Case Study of Ávila (Spain)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-19, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:8:p:2196-:d:222167. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.