IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v9y2020i12p536-d465908.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Strategies for the Management of Traditional Chestnut Landscapes in Pesio Valley, Italy: A Participatory Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Paola Gullino

    (Department of Agricultural, Forest and Food Sciences, University of Turin, Largo Paolo Braccini 2, 10095 Grugliasco TO, Italy)

  • Maria Gabriella Mellano

    (Department of Agricultural, Forest and Food Sciences, University of Turin, Largo Paolo Braccini 2, 10095 Grugliasco TO, Italy
    Chestnut R&D Center-Piemonte, Largo Paolo Braccini 2, 10095 Grugliasco TO, Italy)

  • Gabriele Loris Beccaro

    (Department of Agricultural, Forest and Food Sciences, University of Turin, Largo Paolo Braccini 2, 10095 Grugliasco TO, Italy
    Chestnut R&D Center-Piemonte, Largo Paolo Braccini 2, 10095 Grugliasco TO, Italy)

  • Marco Devecchi

    (Department of Agricultural, Forest and Food Sciences, University of Turin, Largo Paolo Braccini 2, 10095 Grugliasco TO, Italy
    Research Centre for Rural Development of Hilly Areas, University of Torino, Largo Paolo Braccini 2, 10095 Grugliasco TO, Italy)

  • Federica Larcher

    (Department of Agricultural, Forest and Food Sciences, University of Turin, Largo Paolo Braccini 2, 10095 Grugliasco TO, Italy
    Research Centre for Rural Development of Hilly Areas, University of Torino, Largo Paolo Braccini 2, 10095 Grugliasco TO, Italy)

Abstract

Through an exploratory case study conducted in the Pesio Valley, northwest Italy, this paper proposes a framework for maintaining traditional chestnut production landscapes and addressing future development policies. The main goal was to understand how to promote a bottom-up planning approach, including stakeholder perceptions in traditional chestnut landscape management. To ensure the sustainability of the landscape, current driving forces and their landscape effects were identified by local stakeholders using a focus group technique. Population ageing, local forestry policies directed towards supporting chestnut growers’ income, social and economic needs, and land fragmentation are the main driving forces that will influence future chestnut landscapes. The focus group participants built two scenarios of possible future development of the chestnut landscape, one characterized by the disappearance and transformation of chestnut stands, the other by their permanence and maintenance. The most recommended strategies for maintaining traditional chestnut cultivation were chestnut processing, fruit designation of origin, and the cultivation of traditional varieties. This study shows that, to preserve the traditional chestnut landscape, the participation of multiple stakeholders is a useful approach in landscape planning. This methodology could guide decision-makers and planners who desire to implement a participatory approach to a sustainable development program for traditional chestnut landscapes.

Suggested Citation

  • Paola Gullino & Maria Gabriella Mellano & Gabriele Loris Beccaro & Marco Devecchi & Federica Larcher, 2020. "Strategies for the Management of Traditional Chestnut Landscapes in Pesio Valley, Italy: A Participatory Approach," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-13, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:9:y:2020:i:12:p:536-:d:465908
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/9/12/536/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/9/12/536/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Carsten Mann & Tobias Plieninger, 2017. "The potential of landscape labelling approaches for integrated landscape management in Europe," Landscape Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(8), pages 904-920, November.
    2. Jørgen Primdahl & Lone S. Kristensen, 2016. "Landscape strategy making and landscape characterisation—experiences from Danish experimental planning processes," Landscape Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(2), pages 227-238, February.
    3. Maggie Roe, 2016. "Editorial: food and landscape," Landscape Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(7), pages 709-713, October.
    4. Paola Gullino & Gabriele Loris Beccaro & Federica Larcher, 2015. "Assessing and Monitoring the Sustainability in Rural World Heritage Sites," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(10), pages 1-25, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Maolin Li & Yongxun Zhang & Changhong Miao & Lulu He & Jiatao Chen, 2022. "Centennial Change and Source–Sink Interaction Process of Traditional Agricultural Landscape: Case from Xin’an Traditional Cherry Cultivation System (1920–2020)," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-22, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Paola Gullino & Luca Battisti & Federica Larcher, 2018. "Linking Multifunctionality and Sustainability for Valuing Peri-Urban Farming: A Case Study in the Turin Metropolitan Area (Italy)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-18, May.
    2. František Petrovič & Martin Boltižiar & Iveta Rakytová & Ivana Tomčíková & Eva Pauditšová, 2021. "Long-Term Development Trend of the Historical Cultural Landscape of the UNESCO Monument: Vlkolínec (Slovakia)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-19, February.
    3. Simon R. Swaffield & Robert C. Corry & Paul Opdam & Wendy McWilliam & Jørgen Primdahl, 2019. "Connecting business with the agricultural landscape: business strategies for sustainable rural development," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(7), pages 1357-1369, November.
    4. Theano S. Terkenli & Aikaterini Gkoltsiou & Dimitris Kavroudakis, 2021. "The Interplay of Objectivity and Subjectivity in Landscape Character Assessment: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches and Challenges," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-19, January.
    5. Haiyun Xu & Tobias Plieninger & Jørgen Primdahl, 2019. "A Systematic Comparison of Cultural and Ecological Landscape Corridors in Europe," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-32, February.
    6. Enrico Pomatto & Marco Devecchi & Federica Larcher, 2022. "Assessment of the Terraced Landscapes’ Integrity: A GIS-Based Approach in a Potential GIAHS-FAO Site (Northwest Piedmont, Italy)," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-21, December.
    7. Soonki Kim, 2016. "World Heritage Site Designation Impacts on a Historic Village: A Case Study on Residents’ Perceptions of Hahoe Village (Korea)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-16, March.
    8. Frontuto, Vito & Corsi, Alessandro & Novelli, Silvia & Gullino, Paola & Larcher, Federica, 2020. "The visual impact of agricultural sheds on rural landscapes: The willingness to pay for mitigation solutions and treatment effects," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    9. Enrico Pomatto & Paola Gullino & Silvia Novelli & Marco Devecchi & Federica Larcher, 2023. "Landscape Strategies for Terraced Landscapes in the European Alpine Region Using a Mixed-Method Analysis Tool," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-21, June.
    10. Yingxue Wang & Jiaheng Du & Jingxing Kuang & Chunxu Chen & Maobiao Li & Jin Wang, 2023. "Two-Scaled Identification of Landscape Character Types and Areas: A Case Study of the Yunnan–Vietnam Railway (Yunnan Section), China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-18, April.
    11. Rosa Tamborrino & Mesut Dinler & Edoardo Patti & Alessandro Aliberti & Matteo Orlando & Claudia De Luca & Simona Tondelli & Zahra Amirzada & Irina Pavlova, 2022. "Engaging Users in Resource Ecosystem Building for Local Heritage-Led Knowledge," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-16, April.
    12. Chiara Paffarini & Biancamaria Torquati & Tiziano Tempesta & Sonia Venanzi & Daniel Vecchiato, 2021. "Rural sustainability and food choice: the effect of territorial characteristics on the consumers’ preferences for organic lentils," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 9(1), pages 1-23, December.
    13. Julia Rey-Pérez & Victoria Domínguez-Ruiz, 2020. "Multidisciplinarity, Citizen Participation and Geographic Information System, Cross-Cutting Strategies for Sustainable Development in Rural Heritage. The Case Study of Valverde de Burguillos (Spain)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-27, November.
    14. Iuliana Vijulie & Ana-Irina Lequeux-Dincă & Mihaela Preda & Alina Mareci & Elena Matei & Roxana Cuculici & Ana-Maria Taloș, 2021. "Certeze Village: The Dilemma of Traditional vs. Post-Modern Architecture in Țara Oașului, Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-21, October.
    15. Jing Shen & Feng-Tzu Huang & Rung-Jiun Chou, 2021. "Agricultural-Heritage-Oriented Rural Revitalization: Experiences from the Ancient Tea Town of Xiping," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-15, September.
    16. Carlos Santos-Iglesia & Pablo Fernández-Arias & Álvaro Antón-Sancho & Diego Vergara, 2022. "Energy Consumption of the Urban Transport Fleet in UNESCO World Heritage Sites: A Case Study of Ávila (Spain)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-19, May.
    17. Corneliu Iațu & Bogdan-Constantin Ibănescu & Oana Mihaela Stoleriu & Alina Munteanu, 2018. "The WHS Designation—A Factor of Sustainable Tourism Growth for Romanian Rural Areas?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-12, February.
    18. Thomas, Houet & Gaetan, Palka & Roberta, Rigo & Hugues, Boussard & Jacques, Baudry & Xavier, Poux & Jean-Baptiste, Narcy & Manuel, Alvarez Martinez José & Stefano, Balbi & Cendrine, Mony & Lucie, Leco, 2022. "European blue and green infrastructure network strategy vs. the common agricultural policy. Insights from an integrated case study (Couesnon, Brittany)," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    19. Zhuo Zheng & Zihan Zhang & Siyuan Wang, 2023. "Measurement and Development of Park Green Space Supply and Demand Based on Community Units: The Example of Beijing’s Daxing New Town," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-22, April.
    20. Vaughn Schmutz & Michael A. Elliott, 2016. "Tourism and Sustainability in the Evaluation of World Heritage Sites, 1980–2010," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-14, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:9:y:2020:i:12:p:536-:d:465908. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.