IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i6p1620-d214738.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spatial and Temporal Variabilities of PM 2.5 Concentrations in China Using Functional Data Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Deqing Wang

    (School of Management, China University of Mining and Technology, Daxue Road 1, Xuzhou 221116, Jiangsu, China)

  • Zhangqi Zhong

    (School of Economics, Zhejiang University of Finance & Economics, Hangzhou 310018, Zhejiang, China)

  • Kaixu Bai

    (Key Laboratory of Geographic Information Science (Ministry of Education), East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, China)

  • Lingyun He

    (School of Management, China University of Mining and Technology, Daxue Road 1, Xuzhou 221116, Jiangsu, China)

Abstract

As air pollution characterized by fine particulate matter has become one of the most serious environmental issues in China, a critical understanding of the behavior of major pollutant is increasingly becoming very important for air pollution prevention and control. The main concern of this study is, within the framework of functional data analysis, to compare the fluctuation patterns of PM 2.5 concentration between provinces from 1998 to 2016 in China, both spatially and temporally. By converting these discrete PM 2.5 concentration values into a smoothing curve with a roughness penalty, the continuous process of PM 2.5 concentration for each province was presented. The variance decomposition via functional principal component analysis indicates that the highest mean and largest variability of PM 2.5 concentration occurred during the period from 2003 to 2012, during which national environmental protection policies were intensively issued. However, the beginning and end stages indicate equal variability, which was far less than that of the middle stage. Since the PM 2.5 concentration curves showed different fluctuation patterns in each province, the adaptive clustering analysis combined with functional analysis of variance were adopted to explore the categories of PM 2.5 concentration curves. The classification result shows that: (1) there existed eight patterns of PM 2.5 concentration among 34 provinces, and the difference among different patterns was significant whether from a static perspective or multiple dynamic perspectives; (2) air pollution in China presents a characteristic of high-emission “club” agglomeration. Comparative analysis of PM 2.5 profiles showed that the heavy pollution areas could rapidly adjust their emission levels according to the environmental protection policies, whereas low pollution areas characterized by the tourism industry would rationally support the opportunity of developing the economy at the expense of environment and resources. This study not only introduces an advanced technique to extract additional information implied in the functions of PM 2.5 concentration, but also provides empirical suggestions for government policies directed to reduce or eliminate the haze pollution fundamentally.

Suggested Citation

  • Deqing Wang & Zhangqi Zhong & Kaixu Bai & Lingyun He, 2019. "Spatial and Temporal Variabilities of PM 2.5 Concentrations in China Using Functional Data Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-20, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:6:p:1620-:d:214738
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/6/1620/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/6/1620/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jeng‐Min Chiou & Pai‐Ling Li, 2007. "Functional clustering and identifying substructures of longitudinal data," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 69(4), pages 679-699, September.
    2. Febrero-Bande, Manuel & de la Fuente, Manuel Oviedo, 2012. "Statistical Computing in Functional Data Analysis: The R Package fda.usc," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 51(i04).
    3. Cuevas, Antonio & Febrero, Manuel & Fraiman, Ricardo, 2004. "An anova test for functional data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 47(1), pages 111-122, August.
    4. Ruey S. Tsay, 2016. "Some Methods for Analyzing Big Dependent Data," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(4), pages 673-688, October.
    5. Jacques, Julien & Preda, Cristian, 2014. "Model-based clustering for multivariate functional data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 92-106.
    6. Julien Jacques & Cristian Preda, 2014. "Functional data clustering: a survey," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 8(3), pages 231-255, September.
    7. Ramsay, James O. & Ramsey, James B., 2002. "Functional data analysis of the dynamics of the monthly index of nondurable goods production," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 107(1-2), pages 327-344, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Manuel Oviedo-de La Fuente & Celestino Ordóñez & Javier Roca-Pardiñas, 2020. "Functional Location-Scale Model to Forecast Bivariate Pollution Episodes," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-12, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jiang, Qing & Hušková, Marie & Meintanis, Simos G. & Zhu, Lixing, 2019. "Asymptotics, finite-sample comparisons and applications for two-sample tests with functional data," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 202-220.
    2. Fang, Kuangnan & Chen, Yuanxing & Ma, Shuangge & Zhang, Qingzhao, 2022. "Biclustering analysis of functionals via penalized fusion," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    3. Christian Acal & Ana M. Aguilera, 2023. "Basis expansion approaches for functional analysis of variance with repeated measures," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 17(2), pages 291-321, June.
    4. Adriano Zanin Zambom & Julian A. A. Collazos & Ronaldo Dias, 2019. "Functional data clustering via hypothesis testing k-means," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 34(2), pages 527-549, June.
    5. Yifan Zhu & Chongzhi Di & Ying Qing Chen, 2019. "Clustering Functional Data with Application to Electronic Medication Adherence Monitoring in HIV Prevention Trials," Statistics in Biosciences, Springer;International Chinese Statistical Association, vol. 11(2), pages 238-261, July.
    6. Poskitt, D.S. & Sengarapillai, Arivalzahan, 2013. "Description length and dimensionality reduction in functional data analysis," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 98-113.
    7. Michael Vogt & Oliver Linton, 2015. "Classification of nonparametric regression functions in heterogeneous panels," CeMMAP working papers CWP06/15, Centre for Microdata Methods and Practice, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    8. Golovkine, Steven & Klutchnikoff, Nicolas & Patilea, Valentin, 2022. "Clustering multivariate functional data using unsupervised binary trees," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    9. Fabrizio Maturo & Rosanna Verde, 2023. "Supervised classification of curves via a combined use of functional data analysis and tree-based methods," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 38(1), pages 419-459, March.
    10. Michael Vogt & Oliver Linton, 2017. "Classification of non-parametric regression functions in longitudinal data models," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 79(1), pages 5-27, January.
    11. Ana Debón & Steven Haberman & Francisco Montes & Edoardo Otranto, 2021. "Do Different Models Induce Changes in Mortality Indicators? That Is a Key Question for Extending the Lee-Carter Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-16, February.
    12. T. Górecki & Ł. Smaga, 2017. "Multivariate analysis of variance for functional data," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(12), pages 2172-2189, September.
    13. Michael Vogt & Oliver Linton, 2015. "Classification of nonparametric regression functions in heterogeneous panels," CeMMAP working papers 06/15, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    14. Christoph Hellmayr & Alan E. Gelfand, 2021. "A Partition Dirichlet Process Model for Functional Data Analysis," Sankhya B: The Indian Journal of Statistics, Springer;Indian Statistical Institute, vol. 83(1), pages 30-65, May.
    15. Zhang, Yi-Chen & Sakhanenko, Lyudmila, 2019. "The naive Bayes classifier for functional data," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 137-146.
    16. Kim, Joonpyo & Oh, Hee-Seok, 2020. "Pseudo-quantile functional data clustering," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    17. Ja‐Yoon Jang & Hee‐Seok Oh & Yaeji Lim & Ying Kuen Cheung, 2021. "Ensemble clustering for step data via binning," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 77(1), pages 293-304, March.
    18. Qiu, Zhiping & Fan, Jiangyuan & Zhang, Jin-Ting & Chen, Jianwei, 2024. "Tests for equality of several covariance matrix functions for multivariate functional data," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    19. Qingzhi Zhong & Huazhen Lin & Yi Li, 2021. "Cluster non‐Gaussian functional data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 77(3), pages 852-865, September.
    20. Qiu, Zhiping & Chen, Jianwei & Zhang, Jin-Ting, 2021. "Two-sample tests for multivariate functional data with applications," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:6:p:1620-:d:214738. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.