IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i5p1269-d209643.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Methane Production from Alginate-Extracted and Non-Extracted Waste of Laminaria japonica : Anaerobic Mono- and Synergetic Co-Digestion Effects on Yield

Author

Listed:
  • Mohammed M.M. Osman

    (College of Agricultural Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China
    Key Laboratory of Efficient Irrigation-Drainage and Agricultural Soil-water Environment in Southern China, Ministry of Education, Nanjing 210098, China
    Department of Agricultural Engineering, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of Dongola, Elsilaim, Dongola P.O. Box 47, Sudan)

  • Xiaohou Shao

    (College of Agricultural Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China
    Key Laboratory of Efficient Irrigation-Drainage and Agricultural Soil-water Environment in Southern China, Ministry of Education, Nanjing 210098, China)

  • Deling Zhao

    (Nanjing Institute of Industry and Technology, Nanjing 210023, China)

  • Amir K. Basheer

    (College of Agricultural Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China)

  • Hongmei Jin

    (Agricultural Biomass Conversion Lab, Circular Agriculture Research Center, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanjing 210014, China)

  • Yingpeng Zhang

    (Agricultural Biomass Conversion Lab, Circular Agriculture Research Center, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanjing 210014, China)

Abstract

This study investigated the potentiality of methane production from alginate-extracted (AEWLJ) and non-extracted (NAEWLJ) waste of Laminaria japonica through batch anaerobic fermentation in mono- and co-digestion with rice straw (RS) at different mixing ratios. Optimal C/N ratio was demonstrated, and system stability was monitored in terms of the total ammonia nitrogen, total volatile fatty acids, and pH throughout the digestion period. The results show that the combination of AEWLJ/RS at 67% mixing ratio generated the highest biogas yield of 247 NmL/gVS, which was 36% higher than the AEWLJ alone. The synergetic effect was clearly observed leading to an increase in the total methane yield up to 78% and 88%, respectively, for arrays of AEWLJ/RS and NAEWLJ/RS. The kinetic model showed a high coefficient of determination (R 2 ≥ 0.9803) when the modified Gompertz model was applied to predict methane production. These outcomes support the possibility of an integrated biorefinery approach to attain value-added products in order to achieve circular economies.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohammed M.M. Osman & Xiaohou Shao & Deling Zhao & Amir K. Basheer & Hongmei Jin & Yingpeng Zhang, 2019. "Methane Production from Alginate-Extracted and Non-Extracted Waste of Laminaria japonica : Anaerobic Mono- and Synergetic Co-Digestion Effects on Yield," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-17, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:5:p:1269-:d:209643
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/5/1269/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/5/1269/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Syaichurrozi, Iqbal, 2018. "Biogas production from co-digestion Salvinia molesta and rice straw and kinetics," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 76-86.
    2. Tsapekos, P. & Kougias, P.G. & Treu, L. & Campanaro, S. & Angelidaki, I., 2017. "Process performance and comparative metagenomic analysis during co-digestion of manure and lignocellulosic biomass for biogas production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(P1), pages 126-135.
    3. Tedesco, S. & Daniels, S., 2018. "Optimisation of biogas generation from brown seaweed residues: Compositional and geographical parameters affecting the viability of a biorefinery concept," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C), pages 712-723.
    4. Allen, Eoin & Wall, David M. & Herrmann, Christiane & Murphy, Jerry D., 2016. "A detailed assessment of resource of biomethane from first, second and third generation substrates," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(P1), pages 656-665.
    5. Yanli, Yang & Peidong, Zhang & Wenlong, Zhang & Yongsheng, Tian & Yonghong, Zheng & Lisheng, Wang, 2010. "Quantitative appraisal and potential analysis for primary biomass resources for energy utilization in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 14(9), pages 3050-3058, December.
    6. Budych-Gorzna, Magdalena & Smoczynski, Marcin & Oleskowicz-Popiel, Piotr, 2016. "Enhancement of biogas production at the municipal wastewater treatment plant by co-digestion with poultry industry waste," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 387-394.
    7. Suganya, T. & Varman, M. & Masjuki, H.H. & Renganathan, S., 2016. "Macroalgae and microalgae as a potential source for commercial applications along with biofuels production: A biorefinery approach," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 909-941.
    8. Cai, Junmeng & Liu, Ronghou & Deng, Chunjian, 2008. "An assessment of biomass resources availability in Shanghai: 2005 analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 12(7), pages 1997-2004, September.
    9. Montingelli, Maria E. & Benyounis, Khaled Y. & Quilty, Brid & Stokes, Joseph & Olabi, Abdul G., 2016. "Optimisation of biogas production from the macroalgae Laminaria sp. at different periods of harvesting in Ireland," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 671-682.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anahita Rabii & Saad Aldin & Yaser Dahman & Elsayed Elbeshbishy, 2019. "A Review on Anaerobic Co-Digestion with a Focus on the Microbial Populations and the Effect of Multi-Stage Digester Configuration," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-25, March.
    2. Suzy C. Cortez & Adriana C. Cherri & Daniel Jugend & Gessica M. K. Jesus & Barbara S. Bezerra, 2022. "How Can Biodigesters Help Drive the Circular Economy? An Analysis Based on the SWOT Matrix and Case Studies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-15, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Luz, Fábio Codignole & Cordiner, Stefano & Manni, Alessandro & Mulone, Vincenzo & Rocco, Vittorio, 2017. "Anaerobic digestion of coffee grounds soluble fraction at laboratory scale: Evaluation of the biomethane potential," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 207(C), pages 166-175.
    2. Ji, Li-Qun, 2015. "An assessment of agricultural residue resources for liquid biofuel production in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 561-575.
    3. Chinnici, Gaetano & D’Amico, Mario & Rizzo, Marcella & Pecorino, Biagio, 2015. "Analysis of biomass availability for energy use in Sicily," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 1025-1030.
    4. Tedesco, S. & Daniels, S., 2018. "Optimisation of biogas generation from brown seaweed residues: Compositional and geographical parameters affecting the viability of a biorefinery concept," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C), pages 712-723.
    5. Prespa Ymeri & Csaba Gyuricza & Csaba Fogarassy, 2020. "Farmers’ Attitudes Towards the Use of Biomass as Renewable Energy—A Case Study from Southeastern Europe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-18, May.
    6. Xin Zhang & Yun-Ze Li & Ao-Bing Wang & Li-Jun Gao & Hui-Juan Xu & Xian-Wen Ning, 2020. "The Development Strategies and Technology Roadmap of Bioenergy for a Typical Region: A Case Study in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region in China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-25, February.
    7. Syaichurrozi, Iqbal, 2018. "Biogas production from co-digestion Salvinia molesta and rice straw and kinetics," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 76-86.
    8. Wang, Wenyan & Ouyang, Wei & Hao, Fanghua & Liu, Genyuan, 2017. "Temporal-spatial variation analysis of agricultural biomass and its policy implication as an alternative energy in northeastern China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 337-349.
    9. Tedesco, S. & Daniels, S., 2019. "Evaluation of inoculum acclimatation and biochemical seasonal variation for the production of renewable gaseous fuel from biorefined Laminaria sp. waste streams," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 1-8.
    10. Kouhgardi, Esmaeil & Zendehboudi, Sohrab & Mohammadzadeh, Omid & Lohi, Ali & Chatzis, Ioannis, 2023. "Current status and future prospects of biofuel production from brown algae in North America: Progress and challenges," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    11. Sarto, Sarto & Hildayati, Raudati & Syaichurrozi, Iqbal, 2019. "Effect of chemical pretreatment using sulfuric acid on biogas production from water hyacinth and kinetics," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 335-350.
    12. Renita, A. Annam & Lakshmi, D. Shanthana & Maheswari, P. & Saxena, Mayank & Kumar, J. Aravind & Vigneswaran, V.S., 2024. "Energy recovery and clean water remediation using antibiofouling polysaccharide coated PAN hollow fiber membrane obtained via green route synthesis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 294(C).
    13. Lim, Juin Yau & Teng, Sin Yong & How, Bing Shen & Nam, KiJeon & Heo, SungKu & Máša, Vítězslav & Stehlík, Petr & Yoo, Chang Kyoo, 2022. "From microalgae to bioenergy: Identifying optimally integrated biorefinery pathways and harvest scheduling under uncertainties in predicted climate," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    14. Awasthi, Mukesh Kumar & Sarsaiya, Surendra & Wainaina, Steven & Rajendran, Karthik & Kumar, Sumit & Quan, Wang & Duan, Yumin & Awasthi, Sanjeev Kumar & Chen, Hongyu & Pandey, Ashok & Zhang, Zengqiang , 2019. "A critical review of organic manure biorefinery models toward sustainable circular bioeconomy: Technological challenges, advancements, innovations, and future perspectives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 115-131.
    15. Vladimir Heredia & Olivier Gonçalves & Luc Marchal & Jeremy Pruvost, 2021. "Producing Energy-Rich Microalgae Biomass for Liquid Biofuels: Influence of Strain Selection and Culture Conditions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-15, February.
    16. Ji, Li-Qun & Zhang, Chuang & Fang, Jing-Qi, 2017. "Economic analysis of converting of waste agricultural biomass into liquid fuel: A case study on a biofuel plant in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 224-229.
    17. Adam Masłoń & Joanna Czarnota & Paulina Szczyrba & Aleksandra Szaja & Joanna Szulżyk-Cieplak & Grzegorz Łagód, 2024. "Assessment of Energy Self-Sufficiency of Wastewater Treatment Plants—A Case Study from Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-19, March.
    18. Syaichurrozi, Iqbal & Basyir, M. Fakhri & Farraz, Rafi Muhammad & Rusdi, Rusdi, 2020. "A preliminary study: Effect of initial pH and Saccharomyces cerevisiae addition on biogas production from acid-pretreated Salvinia molesta and kinetics," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    19. Munir, Mamoona & Ahmad, Mushtaq & Saeed, Muhammad & Waseem, Amir & Rehan, Mohammad & Nizami, Abdul-Sattar & Zafar, Muhammad & Arshad, Muhammad & Sultana, Shazia, 2019. "Sustainable production of bioenergy from novel non-edible seed oil (Prunus cerasoides) using bimetallic impregnated montmorillonite clay catalyst," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 321-332.
    20. Huang, Jintao & Lyu, Sha & Han, He & Wang, Yanjiang & Sun, Haoyang & Su, Jingtao & Liu, Yidong & Min, Yonggang & Sun, Dazhi, 2022. "Enhanced looping biomass/vapour gasification utilizing waste heat from molten copper slags," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 252(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:5:p:1269-:d:209643. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.