IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v294y2024ics0360544224004079.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Energy recovery and clean water remediation using antibiofouling polysaccharide coated PAN hollow fiber membrane obtained via green route synthesis

Author

Listed:
  • Renita, A. Annam
  • Lakshmi, D. Shanthana
  • Maheswari, P.
  • Saxena, Mayank
  • Kumar, J. Aravind
  • Vigneswaran, V.S.

Abstract

Biofouling is an important biological constrain in the water treatment process, and the control or management strategies using green principles have gained recent attention. Antibiofouling agents based on the biological source are now extensively studied due to their high efficacy and are environmentally friendly. In this present study, Poly Acrylo Nitrile (PAN)/Ulvan hollow fibre membranes of four different modules were fabricated for water treatment studies by testing against B. subtilis and E. coli along with separation efficiency studies on proteins such as albumin, pepsin, and clay. Ulvan (Ulv), green seaweed sulfated polysaccharide extracted from Ulva fasciata, was coated on PAN hollow fibres, fabricated using a wet-spinning process. Ulvan was dip-coated on membrane surface followed by cross-linking and resultant changes in terms of performance and morphology. PAN/Ulv hollow fibre membranes were examined for the pure water flux and protein separation analysis to analyse the membrane efficiency. SEM was used to analyse the membrane structure and ATR- FTIR for the determination of functional groups. Ulvan coated (310 C) hollow fibre membrane showed better performance than the other three membranes with a flux of 398.1 L m−2 h−1. Higher sample concentration of suspended solids paved simpler route for enhanced COD sequestration efficacy. Pepsin, albumin, and clay particles were rejected by the 310C Ulvan adorned membranes at rates greater than 80%. By incrementing suspended particles beyond 3200 mg/L, the greatest power recovery was reduced that portrays an adverse influence of bio-fouling process on membrane operation. Experimental results demonstrated that synthesised 310 C membrane possessed better separation performance and antifouling characteristics for aquatic water systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Renita, A. Annam & Lakshmi, D. Shanthana & Maheswari, P. & Saxena, Mayank & Kumar, J. Aravind & Vigneswaran, V.S., 2024. "Energy recovery and clean water remediation using antibiofouling polysaccharide coated PAN hollow fiber membrane obtained via green route synthesis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 294(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:294:y:2024:i:c:s0360544224004079
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2024.130635
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544224004079
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2024.130635?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Margareta, Winny & Nagarajan, Dillirani & Chang, Jo-Shu & Lee, Duu-Jong, 2020. "Dark fermentative hydrogen production using macroalgae (Ulva sp.) as the renewable feedstock," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    2. Mhatre, Apurv & Gore, Suhas & Mhatre, Akanksha & Trivedi, Nitin & Sharma, Manju & Pandit, Reena & Anil, Annamma & Lali, Arvind, 2019. "Effect of multiple product extractions on bio-methane potential of marine macrophytic green alga Ulva lactuca," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 742-751.
    3. Martin F. Haase & Harim Jeon & Noah Hough & Jong Hak Kim & Kathleen J. Stebe & Daeyeon Lee, 2017. "Multifunctional nanocomposite hollow fiber membranes by solvent transfer induced phase separation," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 8(1), pages 1-7, December.
    4. Suganya, T. & Varman, M. & Masjuki, H.H. & Renganathan, S., 2016. "Macroalgae and microalgae as a potential source for commercial applications along with biofuels production: A biorefinery approach," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 909-941.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kostas, Emily T. & Adams, Jessica M.M. & Ruiz, Héctor A. & Durán-Jiménez, Gabriela & Lye, Gary J., 2021. "Macroalgal biorefinery concepts for the circular bioeconomy: A review on biotechnological developments and future perspectives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    2. Lim, Juin Yau & Teng, Sin Yong & How, Bing Shen & Nam, KiJeon & Heo, SungKu & Máša, Vítězslav & Stehlík, Petr & Yoo, Chang Kyoo, 2022. "From microalgae to bioenergy: Identifying optimally integrated biorefinery pathways and harvest scheduling under uncertainties in predicted climate," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    3. Vladimir Heredia & Olivier Gonçalves & Luc Marchal & Jeremy Pruvost, 2021. "Producing Energy-Rich Microalgae Biomass for Liquid Biofuels: Influence of Strain Selection and Culture Conditions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-15, February.
    4. Munir, Mamoona & Ahmad, Mushtaq & Saeed, Muhammad & Waseem, Amir & Rehan, Mohammad & Nizami, Abdul-Sattar & Zafar, Muhammad & Arshad, Muhammad & Sultana, Shazia, 2019. "Sustainable production of bioenergy from novel non-edible seed oil (Prunus cerasoides) using bimetallic impregnated montmorillonite clay catalyst," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 321-332.
    5. Rodríguez, R. & Espada, J.J. & Moreno, J. & Vicente, G. & Bautista, L.F. & Morales, V. & Sánchez-Bayo, A. & Dufour, J., 2018. "Environmental analysis of Spirulina cultivation and biogas production using experimental and simulation approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 129(PB), pages 724-732.
    6. Keon Hee Kim & Eun Yeol Lee, 2017. "Environmentally-Benign Dimethyl Carbonate-Mediated Production of Chemicals and Biofuels from Renewable Bio-Oil," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-15, November.
    7. Salama, El-Sayed & Kurade, Mayur B. & Abou-Shanab, Reda A.I. & El-Dalatony, Marwa M. & Yang, Il-Seung & Min, Booki & Jeon, Byong-Hun, 2017. "Recent progress in microalgal biomass production coupled with wastewater treatment for biofuel generation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 1189-1211.
    8. Neel Patel & Bishnu Acharya & Prabir Basu, 2021. "Hydrothermal Carbonization (HTC) of Seaweed (Macroalgae) for Producing Hydrochar," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-16, March.
    9. Esakkimuthu, Sivakumar & Krishnamurthy, Venkatesan & Wang, Shuang & El-Fatah Abomohra, Abd & Shanmugam, Sabarathinam & Ramakrishnan, Sankar Ganesh & Subrmaniam, Sadhasivam & K, Swaminathan, 2019. "Simultaneous induction of biomass and lipid production in Tetradesmus obliquus BPL16 through polysorbate supplementation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 807-815.
    10. Bonassa, Gabriela & Schneider, Lara Talita & Canever, Victor Bruno & Cremonez, Paulo André & Frigo, Elisandro Pires & Dieter, Jonathan & Teleken, Joel Gustavo, 2018. "Scenarios and prospects of solid biofuel use in Brazil," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 82(P3), pages 2365-2378.
    11. Chen, Chunxiang & Huang, Yuting & Qin, Songheng & Huang, Dengchang & Bu, Xiaoyan & Huang, Haozhong, 2020. "Slagging tendency estimation of aquatic microalgae and comparison with terrestrial biomass and waste," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    12. Marwa G. Saad & Noura S. Dosoky & Mohamed S. Zoromba & Hesham M. Shafik, 2019. "Algal Biofuels: Current Status and Key Challenges," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-22, May.
    13. Banerjee, Sanjukta & Banerjee, Srijoni & Ghosh, Ananta K. & Das, Debabrata, 2020. "Maneuvering the genetic and metabolic pathway for improving biofuel production in algae: Present status and future prospective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    14. Jambo, Siti Azmah & Abdulla, Rahmath & Mohd Azhar, Siti Hajar & Marbawi, Hartinie & Gansau, Jualang Azlan & Ravindra, Pogaku, 2016. "A review on third generation bioethanol feedstock," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 756-769.
    15. John J. Milledge & Birthe V. Nielsen & Supattra Maneein & Patricia J. Harvey, 2019. "A Brief Review of Anaerobic Digestion of Algae for Bioenergy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-22, March.
    16. Dahmen-Ben Moussa, Ines & Chtourou, Haifa & Hassairi, Ilem & Sayadi, Sami & Dhouib, Abdelhafidh, 2019. "The effect of switching environmental conditions on content and structure of lipid produced by a wild strain Picochlorum sp," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 406-415.
    17. Mabhaudhi, T. & Mpandeli, S. & Madhlopa, A. & Modi, A. T. & Backeberg, G. & Nhamo, Luxon, "undated". "Southern Africa’s water-energy nexus: towards regional integration and development," Papers published in Journals (Open Access) H047590, International Water Management Institute.
    18. Mohammed M.M. Osman & Xiaohou Shao & Deling Zhao & Amir K. Basheer & Hongmei Jin & Yingpeng Zhang, 2019. "Methane Production from Alginate-Extracted and Non-Extracted Waste of Laminaria japonica : Anaerobic Mono- and Synergetic Co-Digestion Effects on Yield," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-17, February.
    19. Piloto-Rodríguez, Ramón & Sánchez-Borroto, Yisel & Melo-Espinosa, Eliezer Ahmed & Verhelst, Sebastian, 2017. "Assessment of diesel engine performance when fueled with biodiesel from algae and microalgae: An overview," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 833-842.
    20. Arun, J. & Raghu, R. & Suhail Madhar Hanif, S. & Thilak, P.G. & Sridhar, D. & Nirmala, N. & Dawn, S.S. & Sivaramakrishnan, R. & Chi, Nguyen Thuy Lan & Pugazhendhi, Arivalagan, 2022. "A comparative review on photo and mixotrophic mode of algae cultivation: Thermochemical processing of biomass, necessity of bio-oil upgrading, challenges and future roadmaps," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 325(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:294:y:2024:i:c:s0360544224004079. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.