IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i4p1015-d206302.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Legal Technologies in Action: The Future of the Legal Market in Light of Disruptive Innovations

Author

Listed:
  • Qian Hongdao

    (Guanghua Law School, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, Zhejiang, China)

  • Sughra Bibi

    (Guanghua Law School, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, Zhejiang, China)

  • Asif Khan

    (Department of Tourism and Hotel Management, School of Management, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, Zhejiang, China
    Department of Tourism & Hospitality, Hazara University, Mansehra 21120, KP, Pakistan)

  • Lorenzo Ardito

    (Department of Engineering, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, 00128 Rome, Italy)

  • Muhammad Bilawal Khaskheli

    (Guanghua Law School, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, Zhejiang, China)

Abstract

Legal technologies (digital solutions to providing legal services) have turned into the essential element of competition among legal-market stakeholders. This study highlights the competitive superiority of legal services based on the concept of innovative disruptive technologies in comparison to traditional firms. For this purpose, the present study identified several trends in the evolution of the legal tech market (i.e., changing landscapes of legal business, delivery models, legal-market segments, and disruptive technologies); moreover, qualitative content analysis has been conducted to provide sound grounds for cost-benefit analysis. Furthermore, cost-benefit analysis makes a comparison of the monetary, social and psychological costs, benefits of legal technologies and traditional firms from clients’ and lawyers’ viewpoints. This has been, in fact, neglected by extant research. Based on these analyses, a new model for legal business has developed to highlight how potential advancements can take place in legal practices. Our findings reveal that legal technologies make legal services more affordable and easily accessible, while helping lawyers to develop innovative solutions and a relaxed working environment. In addition, this study contributes to the literature on service innovation with a focus on how new services and business models have been developed in the legal market as a result of digital technologies. Eventually, this study adds theoretical and practical implications to the research discussing the advent of legal technologies.

Suggested Citation

  • Qian Hongdao & Sughra Bibi & Asif Khan & Lorenzo Ardito & Muhammad Bilawal Khaskheli, 2019. "Legal Technologies in Action: The Future of the Legal Market in Light of Disruptive Innovations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-19, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:4:p:1015-:d:206302
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/4/1015/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/4/1015/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Christensen, Clayton M. & Rosenbloom, Richard S., 1995. "Explaining the attacker's advantage: Technological paradigms, organizational dynamics, and the value network," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 24(2), pages 233-257, March.
    2. Cutler, David M. & Jessup, Amber & Kenkel, Donald & Starr, Martha A., 2015. "Valuing Regulations Affecting Addictive or Habitual Goods," Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 6(2), pages 247-280, July.
    3. Marie-Hélène Delmond & Fabien Coelho & Alain Keravel & Robert Mahl, 2017. "How Information Systems Enable Digital Transformation: A Focus on Business Models and Value Co-Production," Post-Print hal-01695504, HAL.
    4. Chris R. Meyer & David G. Cohen & Sudhir Nair, 2017. "Some have to, and some want to: Why firms adopt a post-industrial form," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 21(2), pages 533-559, June.
    5. Ardito, Lorenzo & Ferraris, Alberto & Messeni Petruzzelli, Antonio & Bresciani, Stefano & Del Giudice, Manlio, 2019. "The role of universities in the knowledge management of smart city projects," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 312-321.
    6. Barton, Benjamin H., 2014. "A glass half full look at the changes in the American legal market," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 38(S), pages 29-42.
    7. Marcel Bogers & Ann-Kristin Zobel & Allan Afuah & Esteve Almirall & Sabine Brunswicker & Linus Dahlander & Lars Frederiksen & Annabelle Gawer & Marc Gruber & Stefan Haefliger & John Hagedoorn & Dennis, 2017. "The open innovation research landscape: established perspectives and emerging themes across different levels of analysis," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(1), pages 8-40, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Qian Hongdao & Sughra Bibi & Dahai Mu & Asif Khan & Asad Raza, 2022. "Legal Business Model Digitalization: The Post COVID-19 Legal Industry," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, April.
    2. Sughra Bibi & Asif Khan & Hongdao Qian & Achille Claudio Garavelli & Angelo Natalicchio & Paolo Capolupo, 2020. "Innovative Climate, a Determinant of Competitiveness and Business Performance in Chinese Law Firms: The Role of Firm Size and Age," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-24, June.
    3. So-Hui Park & Dong-Gu Lee & Jin-Sung Park & Jun-Woo Kim, 2021. "A Survey of Research on Data Analytics-Based Legal Tech," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-24, July.
    4. Qian Hongdao & Sughra Bibi & Asif Khan & Lorenzo Ardito & Mohammad Nurunnabi, 2019. "Does What Goes Around Really Comes Around? The Mediating Effect of CSR on the Relationship between Transformational Leadership and Employee’s Job Performance in Law Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-19, June.
    5. Diller, Markus & Asen, Martin & Späth, Thomas, 2020. "The effects of personality traits on digital transformation: Evidence from German tax consulting," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 37(C).
    6. Esther Salmerón-Manzano, 2021. "Legaltech and Lawtech: Global Perspectives, Challenges, and Opportunities," Laws, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-9, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Magistretti, Stefano & Dell'Era, Claudio & Verganti, Roberto, 2020. "Searching for the right application: A technology development review and research agenda," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    2. Alberto Ferraris & Gabriele Santoro & Anna Claudia Pellicelli, 2020. "“Openness” of public governments in smart cities: removing the barriers for innovation and entrepreneurship," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 16(4), pages 1259-1280, December.
    3. Yuliya Snihur & Llewellyn D. W. Thomas & Robert A. Burgelman, 2018. "An Ecosystem‐Level Process Model of Business Model Disruption: The Disruptor's Gambit," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(7), pages 1278-1316, November.
    4. Baldwin, Carliss Y. & Bogers, Marcel L.A.M. & Kapoor, Rahul & West, Joel, 2024. "Focusing the ecosystem lens on innovation studies," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(3).
    5. Spaniol, Matthew J. & Rowland, Nicholas J., 2022. "Business ecosystems and the view from the future: The use of corporate foresight by stakeholders of the Ro-Ro shipping ecosystem in the Baltic Sea Region," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    6. Hagedoorn, John & Carayannis, Elias & Alexander, Jeffrey, 2001. "Strange bedfellows in the personal computer industry: technology alliances between IBM and Apple," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(5), pages 837-849, May.
    7. Benjamin Cole & Preeta Banerjee, 2013. "Morally Contentious Technology-Field Intersections: The Case of Biotechnology in the United States," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 115(3), pages 555-574, July.
    8. Bertschek, Irene & Kesler, Reinhold, 2022. "Let the user speak: Is feedback on Facebook a source of firms’ innovation?," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    9. Michelacci, Claudio & Schivardi, Fabiano, 2020. "Are they all like Bill, Mark, and Steve? The education premium for entrepreneurs," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    10. Radziwon, Agnieszka & Bogers, Marcel, 2019. "Open innovation in SMEs: Exploring inter-organizational relationships in an ecosystem," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 573-587.
    11. Husain, Shaiara & Sohag, Kazi & Wu, Yanrui, 2022. "The response of green energy and technology investment to climate policy uncertainty: An application of twin transitions strategy," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    12. Luciana Cingolani & Tim Hildebrandt, 2022. "Incentive Structures for the Adoption of Crowdsourcing in Public Policy: A Bureaucratic Politics Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-16, October.
    13. Andersson, Martin & Noseleit, Florian, 2008. "Start-Ups and Employment Growth - Evidence from Sweden," Working Paper Series in Economics and Institutions of Innovation 155, Royal Institute of Technology, CESIS - Centre of Excellence for Science and Innovation Studies.
    14. Ngoc Thach Pham & Anh Duc Do & Quang Vinh Nguyen & Van Loi Ta & Thi Thanh Binh Dao & Dieu Linh Ha & Xuan Truong Hoang, 2021. "Research on Knowledge Management Models at Universities Using Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-15, January.
    15. Rui Baptista & Vítor Escária & Paulo Madruga, 2008. "Entrepreneurship, regional development and job creation: the case of Portugal," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 30(1), pages 49-58, January.
    16. Anna Maria Lis & Marita McPhillips & Adrian Lis, 2020. "Sustainability of Cluster Organizations as Open Innovation Intermediaries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-16, December.
    17. Cenamor, Javier, 2021. "Complementor competitive advantage: A framework for strategic decisions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 335-343.
    18. Pistorius, C. W. I. & Utterback, J. M., 1997. "Multi-mode interaction among technologies," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 26(1), pages 67-84, March.
    19. Christopher S. Hayter, 2016. "A trajectory of early-stage spinoff success: the role of knowledge intermediaries within an entrepreneurial university ecosystem," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 47(3), pages 633-656, October.
    20. Ceccagnoli, Marco & Lee, You-Na & Walsh, John P., 2024. "Reaching beyond low-hanging fruit: Basic research and innovativeness," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(1).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:4:p:1015-:d:206302. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.