IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i23p6852-d293213.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using the Fuzzy Delphi Method to Study the Construction Needs of an Elementary Campus and Achieve Sustainability

Author

Listed:
  • Jen Chun Wang

    (Department of Industry Technology Education, National Kaohsiung Normal University, No.62 Shenjhong Rd., Yanchao District, Kaohsiung 82446, Taiwan)

  • Kuo-Tsang Huang

    (Department of Bioenvironmental Systems Engineering, National Taiwan University, 1, Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei 10617, Taiwan)

  • Meng Yun Ko

    (Department of Industry Technology Education, National Kaohsiung Normal University, No.62 Shenjhong Rd., Yanchao District, Kaohsiung 82446, Taiwan)

Abstract

One of the crucial concerns for achieving a campus’s sustainable development is that the school buildings should meet the needs of students and teachers. The design of school buildings should not only facilitate teaching activities but also provide a teaching environment that stimulates or encourages autonomous learning in students. School buildings are the site of classroom instruction and also serve as a teaching tool that helps in achieving educational objectives and providing compulsory education. They must consider modern ideas before construction, since education is constantly reformed and updated using new policies. Elementary school teachers and students are the most frequent users of school buildings, and their needs must be prioritized vis-à-vis elementary school building construction. We invited a total of 29 scholars, experts, and school managers to help create questionnaires to assess user level of need for each item of school building design, employing the fuzzy Delphi method. Questionnaires were divided into four major dimensions, namely campus buildings, campus environment, athletic fields, and auxiliary facilities, and the dimensions were composed of 33 items. The targets of the survey were teachers and students at a school located in Kaohsiung City, Taiwan. The results suggest that teachers and students both most highly value improved athletic fields; in particular, an indoor stadium was the most highly desired construction project. For safety reasons, replacing school walls with dwarf hedges was the least desirable item among teachers and students. Our objective was to provide a school building design reference for school administrative authorities and architects.

Suggested Citation

  • Jen Chun Wang & Kuo-Tsang Huang & Meng Yun Ko, 2019. "Using the Fuzzy Delphi Method to Study the Construction Needs of an Elementary Campus and Achieve Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-13, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:23:p:6852-:d:293213
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/23/6852/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/23/6852/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhang, Qin & Luo, Yuhan & Zhang, Xinghui & Wang, Yun, 2018. "The relationship among school safety, school satisfaction, and students' cigarette smoking: Based on a multilevel mediation model," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 96-102.
    2. Suganthi, L. & Iniyan, S. & Samuel, Anand A., 2015. "Applications of fuzzy logic in renewable energy systems – A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 585-607.
    3. Qin, Quande & Liang, Fuqi & Li, Li & Wei, Yi-Ming, 2017. "Selection of energy performance contracting business models: A behavioral decision-making approach," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 422-433.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alba Arias & Iñigo Leon & Xabat Oregi & Cristina Marieta, 2021. "Environmental Assessment of University Campuses: The Case of the University of Navarra in Pamplona (Spain)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-17, August.
    2. Agnieszka Budziewicz-Guźlecka & Anna Drab-Kurowska, 2020. "Problems of Infrastructure Markets with Particular Emphasis on the Postal Market in the Context of Digital Exclusion," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-18, June.
    3. Mohammed Abdul-Rahman & Wale Alade & Shahnawaz Anwer, 2023. "A Composite Resilience Index (CRI) for Developing Resilience and Sustainability in University Towns," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-27, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Minhui & Zhang, Qin & Zhou, Dequn & Wang, Lei, 2021. "Punishment or reward? Strategies of stakeholders in the quality of photovoltaic plants based on evolutionary game analysis in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    2. Al-Falahi, Monaaf D.A. & Jayasinghe, Shantha D.G. & Enshaei, Hossein, 2019. "Hybrid algorithm for optimal operation of hybrid energy systems in electric ferries," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    3. Hannan, M.A. & Ali, Jamal A. & Mohamed, Azah & Hussain, Aini, 2018. "Optimization techniques to enhance the performance of induction motor drives: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P2), pages 1611-1626.
    4. Laura Canale & Anna Rita Di Fazio & Mario Russo & Andrea Frattolillo & Marco Dell’Isola, 2021. "An Overview on Functional Integration of Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems in Multi-Energy Buildings," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-33, February.
    5. Nima Mirzaei, 2022. "A Multicriteria Decision Framework for Solar Power Plant Location Selection Problem with Pythagorean Fuzzy Data: A Case Study on Green Energy in Turkey," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-18, November.
    6. Sellak, Hamza & Ouhbi, Brahim & Frikh, Bouchra & Palomares, Iván, 2017. "Towards next-generation energy planning decision-making: An expert-based framework for intelligent decision support," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 1544-1577.
    7. Kara Mostefa Khelil, Chérifa & Amrouche, Badia & Benyoucef, Abou soufiane & Kara, Kamel & Chouder, Aissa, 2020. "New Intelligent Fault Diagnosis (IFD) approach for grid-connected photovoltaic systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    8. Ussama Assad & Muhammad Arshad Shehzad Hassan & Umar Farooq & Asif Kabir & Muhammad Zeeshan Khan & S. Sabahat H. Bukhari & Zain ul Abidin Jaffri & Judit Oláh & József Popp, 2022. "Smart Grid, Demand Response and Optimization: A Critical Review of Computational Methods," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-36, March.
    9. Patrick Sunday Onen & Geev Mokryani & Rana H. A. Zubo, 2022. "Planning of Multi-Vector Energy Systems with High Penetration of Renewable Energy Source: A Comprehensive Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-25, August.
    10. Harrou, Fouzi & Sun, Ying & Taghezouit, Bilal & Saidi, Ahmed & Hamlati, Mohamed-Elkarim, 2018. "Reliable fault detection and diagnosis of photovoltaic systems based on statistical monitoring approaches," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 116(PA), pages 22-37.
    11. Md Alamgir Hossain & Hemanshu Roy Pota & Walid Issa & Md Jahangir Hossain, 2017. "Overview of AC Microgrid Controls with Inverter-Interfaced Generations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-27, August.
    12. Burgaç, Alper & Yavuz, Hakan, 2019. "Fuzzy Logic based hybrid type control implementation of a heaving wave energy converter," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 1202-1214.
    13. Kumar, Rajesh & Agarwala, Arun, 2016. "Renewable energy technology diffusion model for techno-economics feasibility," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 1515-1524.
    14. Dhimish, Mahmoud & Holmes, Violeta & Mehrdadi, Bruce & Dales, Mark & Mather, Peter, 2017. "Photovoltaic fault detection algorithm based on theoretical curves modelling and fuzzy classification system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(P1), pages 276-290.
    15. Hossein Shayeghi & Elnaz Shahryari & Mohammad Moradzadeh & Pierluigi Siano, 2019. "A Survey on Microgrid Energy Management Considering Flexible Energy Sources," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-26, June.
    16. Nie, S. & Huang, Charley Z. & Huang, G.H. & Li, Y.P. & Chen, J.P. & Fan, Y.R. & Cheng, G.H., 2016. "Planning renewable energy in electric power system for sustainable development under uncertainty – A case study of Beijing," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 772-786.
    17. Karunathilake, Hirushie & Hewage, Kasun & Prabatha, Tharindu & Ruparathna, Rajeev & Sadiq, Rehan, 2020. "Project deployment strategies for community renewable energy: A dynamic multi-period planning approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 237-258.
    18. Zhang, Kai & Li, Jingzhi & He, Zhubin & Yan, Wanfeng, 2018. "Microgrid energy dispatching for industrial zones with renewable generations and electric vehicles via stochastic optimization and learning," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 501(C), pages 356-369.
    19. Yuan, Jiahai & Li, Xinying & Xu, Chuanbo & Zhao, Changhong & Liu, Yuanxin, 2019. "Investment risk assessment of coal-fired power plants in countries along the Belt and Road initiative based on ANP-Entropy-TODIM method," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 623-640.
    20. Yujia Ge & Yurong Nan & Lijun Bai, 2019. "A Hybrid Prediction Model for Solar Radiation Based on Long Short-Term Memory, Empirical Mode Decomposition, and Solar Profiles for Energy Harvesting Wireless Sensor Networks," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-21, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:23:p:6852-:d:293213. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.