IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i23p6788-d292425.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Framework for Assessing Benefits of Implemented Nature-Based Solutions

Author

Listed:
  • Linda J. Watkin

    (IHE Delft Institute for Water Education, 2611 Delft, The Netherlands)

  • Laddaporn Ruangpan

    (IHE Delft Institute for Water Education, 2611 Delft, The Netherlands)

  • Zoran Vojinovic

    (IHE Delft Institute for Water Education, 2611 Delft, The Netherlands)

  • Sutat Weesakul

    (School of Engineering and Technology, Asian Institute of Technology, P.O. Box 4, Khlong Luang, Pathumthani 12120, Thailand
    Hydro Informatics Institute (HII), 901, Ngamwongwan Road, Lat Yao, Chatuchak, Bangkok 10900, Thailand)

  • Arlex Sanchez Torres

    (IHE Delft Institute for Water Education, 2611 Delft, The Netherlands)

Abstract

Nature-based solutions (NBS) are solutions that can protect, sustainably manage, and restore natural or modified ecosystems in urban and rural areas, while providing many benefits and co-benefits including stormwater mitigation, biodiversity enhancement, and human well-being. As such, NBS have the potential to alleviate many of the environmental, social, and economic issues that we face today. Grey infrastructure, such as lined trenches and catch basins, pipes, and concrete dikes are frequently used for stormwater management and flood protection, but they do not provide many of the co-benefits that are common with NBS. Grey infrastructure is designed to quickly collect and remove rainwater, whereas NBS keep rainwater where it falls, and where it can be used by the environment. Many stakeholders lack knowledge of the capabilities and benefits of NBS, and as a result, they continue to rely on grey infrastructure in their projects. When information is made available on the benefits and how they can be quantitatively measured, it is hoped that NBS will be promoted to a mainstream infrastructure choice. A valuable way to quantify and highlight the benefits of NBS is by using an evaluation framework. There are several evaluation frameworks that qualitatively assess the potential benefits of possible NBS, however there is a need for quantitative frameworks that can assess the actual benefits (or performance) of implemented (or existing) NBS. This article presents an evaluation framework that aims to quantify the benefits and co-benefits of implemented NBS. The framework involves five main steps: (1) selection of NBS benefit categories, (2) selection of NBS indicators, (3) calculation of indicator values, (4) calculation of NBS grade, and (5) recommendations. The outcome of the framework is a single numerical grade that reflects the benefit functioning for an NBS site and values for each performance indicator. This information may be used by decision makers to determine their budget allocations to expand or construct a new NBS site, to update maintenance plans that will improve the benefits of that site, to set up programs to monitor the NBS benefits and co-benefits over time, and to schedule labour and resources for other NBS projects. The framework was tested and validated on a case study of NBS in Thailand. Through conversations with stakeholders and knowledge of the case study area, relevant categories and indicators were chosen. Using data and information obtained through various means, values for each indicator and the overall NBS grade were calculated. The values revealed which benefits were pronounced, those that were weak, and where improvements were required.

Suggested Citation

  • Linda J. Watkin & Laddaporn Ruangpan & Zoran Vojinovic & Sutat Weesakul & Arlex Sanchez Torres, 2019. "A Framework for Assessing Benefits of Implemented Nature-Based Solutions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-25, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:23:p:6788-:d:292425
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/23/6788/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/23/6788/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alida Alves & Berry Gersonius & Arlex Sanchez & Zoran Vojinovic & Zoran Kapelan, 2018. "Multi-criteria Approach for Selection of Green and Grey Infrastructure to Reduce Flood Risk and Increase CO-benefits," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 32(7), pages 2505-2522, May.
    2. Zhang, Junze & Yu, Zhongqi & Yu, Tengfei & Si, Jianhua & Feng, Qi & Cao, Shixiong, 2018. "Transforming flash floods into resources in arid China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 746-753.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Daniela Vanella & Simona Consoli & Alberto Continella & Gaetano Chinnici & Mirco Milani & Giuseppe Luigi Cirelli & Mario D’Amico & Giulia Maesano & Alessandra Gentile & Paolo La Spada & Francesco Scol, 2023. "Environmental and Agro-Economic Sustainability of Olive Orchards Irrigated with Reclaimed Water under Deficit Irrigation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-22, October.
    2. Ana Paula Morais de Lima & Aline F. Rodrigues & Agnieszka Ewa Latawiec & Viviane Dib & Fernanda D. Gomes & Veronica Maioli & Ingrid Pena & Fernanda Tubenchlak & Alanna J. Rebelo & Karen J. Esler & Amy, 2022. "Framework for Planning and Evaluation of Nature-Based Solutions for Water in Peri-Urban Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-15, June.
    3. Kang, Shiteng & Kroeger, Timm & Shemie, Daniel & Echavarria, Marta & Montalvo, Tamara & Bremer, Leah L. & Bennett, Genevieve & Barreto, Samuel Roiphe & Bracale, Henrique & Calero, Claudia & Cardenas, , 2023. "Investing in nature-based solutions: Cost profiles of collective-action watershed investment programs," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    4. Paschalis D. Koutalakis & Ourania A. Tzoraki & Georgios I. Prazioutis & Georgios T. Gkiatas & George N. Zaimes, 2021. "Can Drones Map Earth Cracks? Landslide Measurements in North Greece Using UAV Photogrammetry for Nature-Based Solutions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-20, April.
    5. Stefano Salata & Silvia Ronchi & Carolina Giaimo & Andrea Arcidiacono & Giulio Gabriele Pantaloni, 2021. "Performance-Based Planning to Reduce Flooding Vulnerability Insights from the Case of Turin (North-West Italy)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-25, May.
    6. Isaac Dekker & Shabnam Sharifyazd & Evans Batung & Kristian L. Dubrawski, 2021. "Maximizing Benefits to Nature and Society in Techno-Ecological Innovation for Water," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-16, June.
    7. Stefano Salata, 2023. "Filling the Gaps in Biophysical Knowledge of Urban Ecosystems: Flooding Mitigation and Stormwater Retention," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-22, March.
    8. Saskia Keesstra & Jeroen Veraart & Jan Verhagen & Saskia Visser & Marit Kragt & Vincent Linderhof & Wilfred Appelman & Jolanda van den Berg & Ayodeji Deolu-Ajayi & Annemarie Groot, 2023. "Nature-Based Solutions as Building Blocks for the Transition towards Sustainable Climate-Resilient Food Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-20, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cai, Zhaoyang & Liu, Zhexi & Zuo, Siming & Cao, Shixiong, 2019. "Finding a Peaceful Road to Urbanization in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 560-563.
    2. Saleh A. Sefry & Ahmed M. Youssef & Emad Y. AbuAlfadael & Mazen M. AbuAbdullah, 2023. "Flood peak discharge and volume runoff envelope curves for 100-year return period for the arid region: Saudi Arabia," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 115(2), pages 1439-1460, January.
    3. Abdul Naser Majidi & Zoran Vojinovic & Alida Alves & Sutat Weesakul & Arlex Sanchez & Floris Boogaard & Jeroen Kluck, 2019. "Planning Nature-Based Solutions for Urban Flood Reduction and Thermal Comfort Enhancement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-27, November.
    4. Ireneusz Nowogoński, 2021. "Runoff Volume Reduction Using Green Infrastructure," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-24, March.
    5. Amirhossein Nazari & Abbas Roozbahani & Seied Mehdy Hashemy Shahdany, 2023. "Integrated SUSTAIN-SWMM-MCDM Approach for Optimal Selection of LID Practices in Urban Stormwater Systems," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 37(9), pages 3769-3793, July.
    6. Sabina Kordana & Daniel Słyś, 2020. "Decision Criteria for the Development of Stormwater Management Systems in Poland," Resources, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-21, February.
    7. Adaku Jane Echendu, 2022. "Flooding, Food Security and the Sustainable Development Goals in Nigeria: An Assemblage and Systems Thinking Approach," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-17, February.
    8. Shengnan Yang & Laddaporn Ruangpan & Arlex Sanchez Torres & Zoran Vojinovic, 2023. "Multi-objective Optimisation Framework for Assessment of Trade-Offs between Benefits and Co-benefits of Nature-based Solutions," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 37(6), pages 2325-2345, May.
    9. Shi Qiu & Haiwei Yin & Jinling Deng & Muhan Li, 2020. "Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Green–Gray Stormwater Control Measures for Non-Point Source Pollution," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-13, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:23:p:6788-:d:292425. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.