IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i19p5458-d272839.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding Construction Stakeholders’ Experience and Attitudes toward Use of the Structurally Insulated Panels (SIPs) in New Zealand

Author

Listed:
  • Jeremy Harris

    (Ara Institute of Canterbury, 130 Madras Street, 8011 Christchurch, New Zealand)

  • Serdar Durdyev

    (Razak Faculty of Technology and Informatics, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Jalan Sultan Yahya Petra, Kuala Lumpur 54100, Malaysia)

  • Serik Tokbolat

    (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Nazarbayev University, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan)

  • Syuhaida Ismail

    (Green Cities and Construction Research Group, Razak Faculty of Technology and Informatics, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Jalan Sultan Yahya Petra, Kuala Lumpur 54100, Malaysia)

  • Nurmurat Kandymov

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Paragon International University, Phnom Penh 12510, Cambodia)

  • Saeed Reza Mohandes

    (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Clear Water Bay, Kowloon 999077, Hong Kong)

Abstract

New Zealand faces a housing shortage with construction struggling to meet demand. Structurally insulated panels (SIPs) have been demonstrated internationally as a method of construction which could reduce construction time frames, improve the standard insulation in housing, as well as reduce the amount of waste generated on construction sites. However, anecdotal evidence shows that the SIPs’ adoption is lacking, which is, perhaps, attributed to its industry-wide acceptance level. Thus, in this study, the construction stakeholders, such as architects/designers, builders, territorial authorities and homeowners were targeted to shed light on current status of SIPs use, benefits offered and any barriers inhibiting its industry-wide implementation. This was done through a survey, which was designed to understand the construction stakeholders’ experience levels regarding SIPs use in New Zealand as well as their opinions about any problems associated with the SIPs adoption. Although the stakeholders were happy with the thermal performance offered by SIPs, the results indicate that lack of familiarity and understanding are one of the main barriers to the widespread use of SIPs in New Zealand. Moreover, proper training and clear design information are reported to be crucial to make the building and consenting processes efficient, which will ultimately improve the cost-effectiveness. Despite the barriers (to SIPs adoption) documented by stakeholders, the common belief is that SIPs offer wide-range of benefits to improve performance of the built environment; hence, the stakeholders expressed their willingness to design/build/recommend SIP homes. It is hoped that the findings of this study will guide the industry practitioners in investing their efforts in wider adoption of SIPs in New Zealand.

Suggested Citation

  • Jeremy Harris & Serdar Durdyev & Serik Tokbolat & Syuhaida Ismail & Nurmurat Kandymov & Saeed Reza Mohandes, 2019. "Understanding Construction Stakeholders’ Experience and Attitudes toward Use of the Structurally Insulated Panels (SIPs) in New Zealand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-14, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:19:p:5458-:d:272839
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/19/5458/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/19/5458/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kaicheng Shen & Chen Cheng & Xiaodong Li & Zhihui Zhang, 2019. "Environmental Cost-Benefit Analysis of Prefabricated Public Housing in Beijing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-21, January.
    2. Medina, Mario A. & King, Jennifer B. & Zhang, Meng, 2008. "On the heat transfer rate reduction of structural insulated panels (SIPs) outfitted with phase change materials (PCMs)," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 667-678.
    3. Serdar Durdyev & Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas & Derek Thurnell & Audrius Banaitis & Ali Ihtiyar, 2018. "Sustainable Construction Industry in Cambodia: Awareness, Drivers and Barriers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-19, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Serdar Durdyev & Serik Tokbolat, 2022. "A quantified model for assessment of drivers of acquiring green buildings by potential clients," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 3815-3831, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xia, L. & Zhang, P. & Wang, R.Z., 2010. "Numerical heat transfer analysis of the packed bed latent heat storage system based on an effective packed bed model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(5), pages 2022-2032.
    2. Li, W.Q. & Qu, Z.G. & Zhang, B.L. & Zhao, K. & Tao, W.Q., 2013. "Thermal behavior of porous stainless-steel fiber felt saturated with phase change material," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 846-852.
    3. Hosang Hyun & Hyunsoo Kim & Hyun-Soo Lee & Moonseo Park & Jeonghoon Lee, 2020. "Integrated Design Process for Modular Construction Projects to Reduce Rework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-19, January.
    4. Ayomikun Solomon Adewumi & Alex Opoku & Zainab Dangana, 2024. "Sustainability assessment frameworks for delivering Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) targets: A case of Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method (BREEAM) UK New Const," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(5), pages 3779-3791, September.
    5. Liang Ma & Yun Le & Hongyang Li & Ruoyu Jin & Poorang Piroozfar & Mingqiang Liu, 2018. "Regional Comparisons of Contemporary Construction Industry Sustainable Concepts in the Chinese Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-17, October.
    6. Pei Dang & Zhanwen Niu & Shang Gao & Lei Hou & Guomin Zhang, 2020. "Critical Factors Influencing the Sustainable Construction Capability in Prefabrication of Chinese Construction Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-21, October.
    7. Sun, Xiaoqin & Medina, Mario A. & Lee, Kyoung Ok & Jin, Xing, 2018. "Laboratory assessment of residential building walls containing pipe-encapsulated phase change materials for thermal management," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 383-391.
    8. Sardari, Pouyan Talebizadeh & Mohammed, Hayder I. & Giddings, Donald & walker, Gavin S. & Gillott, Mark & Grant, David, 2019. "Numerical study of a multiple-segment metal foam-PCM latent heat storage unit: Effect of porosity, pore density and location of heat source," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    9. Hosang Hyun & Hyung-Geun Kim & Jin-Sung Kim, 2022. "Integrated Off-Site Construction Design Process including DfMA Considerations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-20, March.
    10. Qiu, Xiaolin & Li, Wei & Song, Guolin & Chu, Xiaodong & Tang, Guoyi, 2012. "Microencapsulated n-octadecane with different methylmethacrylate-based copolymer shells as phase change materials for thermal energy storage," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 188-199.
    11. Cakraningrat Kencana Murti & Fadhilah Muslim, 2023. "Relationship between Functions, Drivers, Barriers, and Strategies of Building Information Modelling (BIM) and Sustainable Construction Criteria: Indonesia Construction Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-27, March.
    12. López-Guerrero, Rafael E. & Vera, Sergio & Carpio, Manuel, 2022. "A quantitative and qualitative evaluation of the sustainability of industrialised building systems: A bibliographic review and analysis of case studies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    13. Laura Treviño-Lozano, 2022. "Framing Social Sustainability in Infrastructure Theory and Practice: A Review of Two Road Projects in Mexico from a Business and Human Rights Lens," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-16, February.
    14. Wang, Xiaoyu & Jin, Xing & Yin, Yonggao & Wang, Xinyu & Shi, Xing & Zhou, Xin, 2020. "Study on non-isothermal moisture transfer characteristics of hygroscopic building materials: From parameter characterization to model analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    15. Wang, Yi-Hsien & Yang, Yue-Tzu, 2011. "Three-dimensional transient cooling simulations of a portable electronic device using PCM (phase change materials) in multi-fin heat sink," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(8), pages 5214-5224.
    16. O’Connor, William E. & Warzoha, Ronald & Weigand, Rebecca & Fleischer, Amy S. & Wemhoff, Aaron P., 2014. "Thermal property prediction and measurement of organic phase change materials in the liquid phase near the melting point," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 496-506.
    17. Dalibor Bartoněk & Jiří Bureš & Otakar Švábenský, 2020. "Evaluation of Influence of the Environment on the Choice of Buildings for Residential Living," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-21, June.
    18. Nomeda Dobrovolskienė & Anastasija Pozniak & Manuela Tvaronavičienė, 2021. "Assessment of the Sustainability of a Real Estate Project Using Multi-Criteria Decision Making," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-19, April.
    19. Gohar Gholamibozanjani & Mohammed Farid, 2021. "A Critical Review on the Control Strategies Applied to PCM-Enhanced Buildings," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-39, March.
    20. Xie, Xing & Chen, Xing-ni & Xu, Bin & Fei, Yue & Pei, Gang, 2022. "Study based on “Heat Flux - Energy Saving Pointer”: Exploring why phase change materials is not energy efficient enough on internal wall in cold region," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 1308-1324.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:19:p:5458-:d:272839. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.