IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i19p5360-d271574.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation Model and Empirical Study on the Competitiveness of the County Silicon Crystal Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Yujie Pan

    (Research Center of Spatial Planning and Human-Environment System Simulation, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China
    Department of Geography, School of Geography and Information Engineering, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China)

  • Ke Peng

    (Research Center of Spatial Planning and Human-Environment System Simulation, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China
    Department of Geography, School of Geography and Information Engineering, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China)

  • Hongxia Peng

    (Research Center of Spatial Planning and Human-Environment System Simulation, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China
    Department of Geography, School of Geography and Information Engineering, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China)

  • Jing Zhang

    (Department of Logistics, School of Business, Huaihua University, Hunan 10548, China)

  • Min Zeng

    (Wuhan Geological Survey Center of China Geological Survey, Wuhan 430205, China)

  • Changsheng Huang

    (Wuhan Geological Survey Center of China Geological Survey, Wuhan 430205, China)

Abstract

The silicon crystal industry is an emerging industry that uses silicon ore to obtain crystalline silicon and silicon micropower through processing. The China silicon crystal industry generally suffers from poor market supervision and low added-value products, which decreases the industry’s competitiveness and affects overall economic development. This study used the SWOT–PEST model to analyze the internal and external factors, constructed the county competitiveness evaluation index system with four dimensions and 20 variables, and used the gray correlation evaluation model to conduct empirical research on data on the competitiveness of the silicon crystal industry in Suichuan and in another three counties. Compared with the industrial competitiveness in the other three counties, the competitiveness in Suichuan County is still relatively low, but it has been increasing rapidly in recent years. The silicon crystal industry in Suichuan County has great advantages, such as resource endowment, energy, and policy support. The main factors affecting the competitiveness of the silicon crystal industry in Suichuan County are the number of brands, the situation of foreign exports, and the output of silicon products. Therefore, Suichuan County should adjust the silicon crystal industry based on these evaluation results to promote the sustainable development of this industry.

Suggested Citation

  • Yujie Pan & Ke Peng & Hongxia Peng & Jing Zhang & Min Zeng & Changsheng Huang, 2019. "Evaluation Model and Empirical Study on the Competitiveness of the County Silicon Crystal Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-15, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:19:p:5360-:d:271574
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/19/5360/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/19/5360/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stuckelberger, Michael & Biron, Rémi & Wyrsch, Nicolas & Haug, Franz-Josef & Ballif, Christophe, 2017. "Review: Progress in solar cells from hydrogenated amorphous silicon," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 1497-1523.
    2. Marco Pesce & Chenyi Shi & Andrea Critto & Xiaohui Wang & Antonio Marcomini, 2018. "SWOT Analysis of the Application of International Standard ISO 14001 in the Chinese Context. A Case Study of Guangdong Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-19, September.
    3. Yong-Jeong Kim & Jaehun Park, 2019. "A Sustainable Development Strategy for the Uzbekistan Textile Industry: The Results of a SWOT-AHP Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-22, August.
    4. Tang, Yong & Sun, Honghang & Yao, Qiang & Wang, Yibo, 2014. "The selection of key technologies by the silicon photovoltaic industry based on the Delphi method and AHP (analytic hierarchy process): Case study of China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 474-482.
    5. Wang, Hanxi & Xu, Jianling & Sheng, Lianxi, 2019. "Study on the comprehensive utilization of city kitchen waste as a resource in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 263-277.
    6. Peng Zhang & Guojin Qin & Yihuan Wang, 2019. "Risk Assessment System for Oil and Gas Pipelines Laid in One Ditch Based on Quantitative Risk Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-21, March.
    7. Hudson C. Laizer & Musa N. Chacha & Patrick A. Ndakidemi, 2019. "Farmers’ Knowledge, Perceptions and Practices in Managing Weeds and Insect Pests of Common Bean in Northern Tanzania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-11, July.
    8. Liu, Jicheng & Lin, Xiangmin, 2019. "Empirical analysis and strategy suggestions on the value-added capacity of photovoltaic industry value chain in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 356-366.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pan Wu & Guoyan Zhao & Yang Li, 2022. "Green Mining Strategy Selection via an Integrated SWOT-PEST Analysis and Fuzzy AHP-MARCOS Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-19, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hanxi Wang & Jianling Xu & Lianxi Sheng & Xuejun Liu & Meihan Zong & Difu Yao, 2019. "Anaerobic Digestion Technology for Methane Production Using Deer Manure Under Different Experimental Conditions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-21, May.
    2. Shi, Yi & Deng, Yawen & Wang, Guoan & Xu, Jiuping, 2020. "Stackelberg equilibrium-based eco-economic approach for sustainable development of kitchen waste disposal with subsidy policy: A case study from China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    3. Peng Zhang & Xiangsu Chen & Chaohai Fan, 2020. "Research on a Safety Assessment Method for Leakage in a Heavy Oil Gathering Pipeline," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-19, March.
    4. Erlantz Allur & Iñaki Heras-Saizarbitoria & Olivier Boiral & Francesco Testa, 2018. "Quality and Environmental Management Linkage: A Review of the Literature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-15, November.
    5. Saeed Nosratabadi & Gergo Pinter & Amir Mosavi & Sandor Semperger, 2020. "Sustainable Banking; Evaluation of the European Business Models," Papers 2003.13423, arXiv.org.
    6. Maria A. Franco & Stefan N. Groesser, 2021. "A Systematic Literature Review of the Solar Photovoltaic Value Chain for a Circular Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-35, August.
    7. Sellak, Hamza & Ouhbi, Brahim & Frikh, Bouchra & Palomares, Iván, 2017. "Towards next-generation energy planning decision-making: An expert-based framework for intelligent decision support," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 1544-1577.
    8. Chabi Simin Najib Dafia & Fei Chen & Peter Davis Sumo, 2022. "Guideline and Strategies of Textile Industry on the Sustainable Development of Benin," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-18, October.
    9. Wang, H., 2015. "A generalized MCDA–DEA (multi-criterion decision analysis–data envelopment analysis) approach to construct slacks-based composite indicator," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 114-122.
    10. Mariana Dubravská & Martina Marchevská & Petra Vašaničová & Rastislav Kotulič, 2020. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management Linkage: An Empirical Analysis of the Slovak Republic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-18, July.
    11. Chun-Chieh Tseng & Jun-Yi Zeng & Min-Liang Hsieh & Chih-Hung Hsu, 2022. "Analysis of Innovation Drivers of New and Old Kinetic Energy Conversion Using a Hybrid Multiple-Criteria Decision-Making Model in the Post-COVID-19 Era: A Chinese Case," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(20), pages 1-25, October.
    12. Ievgen Babeshko & Oleg Illiashenko & Vyacheslav Kharchenko & Kostiantyn Leontiev, 2022. "Towards Trustworthy Safety Assessment by Providing Expert and Tool-Based XMECA Techniques," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(13), pages 1-25, June.
    13. Wang Lai Wang & Marek Kryszak, 2020. "Technological Progress and Supply Base under Uncertain Market Conditions: The Case Study of the Taiwanese c-Si Solar Industry 2016–2019," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-25, November.
    14. Julius Mugonza & James P. Egonyu & Michael H. Otim, 2023. "Farmers’ Knowledge, Control Methods, and Challenges of Managing Bean Leaf Beetles ( Ootheca spp.) in Uganda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-14, March.
    15. Peng Zhang & Guojin Qin & Yihuan Wang, 2019. "Risk Assessment System for Oil and Gas Pipelines Laid in One Ditch Based on Quantitative Risk Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-21, March.
    16. Ionut Viorel Herghiligiu & Ioan-Bogdan Robu & Marius Pislaru & Adrian Vilcu & Anca Laura Asandului & Silvia Avasilcăi & Catalin Balan, 2019. "Sustainable Environmental Management System Integration and Business Performance: A Balance Assessment Approach Using Fuzzy Logic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-30, September.
    17. Syed Hammad Mian & Bashir Salah & Wadea Ameen & Khaja Moiduddin & Hisham Alkhalefah, 2020. "Adapting Universities for Sustainability Education in Industry 4.0: Channel of Challenges and Opportunities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-33, July.
    18. Dominik Zimon & Jonah Tyan & Robert Sroufe, 2019. "Implementing Sustainable Supply Chain Management: Reactive, Cooperative, and Dynamic Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-22, December.
    19. Chanthawong, Anuman & Dhakal, Shobhakar, 2016. "Stakeholders' perceptions on challenges and opportunities for biodiesel and bioethanol policy development in Thailand," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 189-206.
    20. Shi, Yi & Xu, Jiuping, 2023. "A multi-objective approach to kitchen waste and excess sludge co-digestion for biomethane production with anaerobic digestion," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(PA).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:19:p:5360-:d:271574. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.