IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i17p4629-d260924.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Study on Green Economy Indicators and Modeling: Russian Context

Author

Listed:
  • Natalia Vukovic

    (Graduate School of Economics and Management, Ural Federal University, Yekaterinburg 620002, Russia)

  • Vladimir Pobedinsky

    (Automobile and Transport Institute, Ural State Forest Engineering University, Yekaterinburg 622100, Russia)

  • Sergey Mityagin

    (Director of Institute of Design & Urban Studies, ITMO University, Saint-Petersburg 197101, Russia)

  • Andrei Drozhzhin

    (Director of Institute of Design & Urban Studies, ITMO University, Saint-Petersburg 197101, Russia)

  • Zhanna Mingaleva

    (Department of Economics and Industrial Production Management, Perm National Research Polytechnic University, Perm 614990, Russia)

Abstract

This article aims to assess and forecast the dynamics of a regional green economy. The research relevance is determined by the need to develop theoretical and methodological basis of the green economy for the transition period and to identify criteria basis for assessing the state and regional level of it. The authors applied the modern methods, which allowed to model criteria considering data uncertainty and both static and dynamic criteria. The research process involved the methods of scientific analysis, comparison and synthesis, the theory of fuzzy sets, and fuzzy modeling. The main principles and methodology of the criteria evaluation for a regional green economy are proposed. The principal methodological approach in this research combines the current state and dynamics of the green economy in evaluating and forecasting the conditions of data uncertainty. The research results form a theoretical, methodological, and practical basis for assessing the current state and level of a regional green economy development, determining the effectiveness of environmental and economic programs, optimizing financial management, conducting environmental monitoring, and developing state plans.

Suggested Citation

  • Natalia Vukovic & Vladimir Pobedinsky & Sergey Mityagin & Andrei Drozhzhin & Zhanna Mingaleva, 2019. "A Study on Green Economy Indicators and Modeling: Russian Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-13, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:17:p:4629-:d:260924
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/17/4629/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/17/4629/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jari Lyytimäki & Riina Antikainen & Joonas Hokkanen & Sirkka Koskela & Sirpa Kurppa & Riina Känkänen & Jyri Seppälä, 2018. "Developing Key Indicators of Green Growth," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(1), pages 51-64, January.
    2. Matthias Finkbeiner & Erwin M. Schau & Annekatrin Lehmann & Marzia Traverso, 2010. "Towards Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 2(10), pages 1-14, October.
    3. Chaofan Chen & Qingxin Lan & Ming Gao & Yawen Sun, 2018. "Green Total Factor Productivity Growth and Its Determinants in China’s Industrial Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-25, April.
    4. Haohui Wu & Yajuan Yu & Shanshan Li & Kai Huang, 2018. "An Empirical Study of the Assessment of Green Development in Beijing, China: Considering Resource Depletion, Environmental Damage and Ecological Benefits Simultaneously," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-25, March.
    5. Anton Nahman & Brian K. Mahumani & Willem J. de Lange, 2016. "Beyond GDP: Towards a Green Economy Index," Development Southern Africa, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(2), pages 215-233, March.
    6. Diana Mihaela Pociovălișteanu & Isabel Novo-Corti & Mirela Ionela Aceleanu & Andreea Claudia Șerban & Eugenia Grecu, 2015. "Employment Policies for a Green Economy at the European Union Level," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(7), pages 1-20, July.
    7. Qian Sun & Xiaohu Zhang & Hanwei Zhang & Haipeng Niu, 2018. "Coordinated development of a coupled social economy and resource environment system: a case study in Henan Province, China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 1385-1404, June.
    8. Polina Baranova & Fred Paterson, 2017. "Environmental capabilities of small and medium sized enterprises: Towards transition to a low carbon economy in the East Midlands," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 32(8), pages 835-853, December.
    9. Andreas, Jan-Justus & Burns, Charlotte & Touza, Julia, 2017. "Renewable Energy as a Luxury? A Qualitative Comparative Analysis of the Role of the Economy in the EU's Renewable Energy Transitions During the ‘Double Crisis’," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 81-90.
    10. Serdar Durdyev & Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas & Derek Thurnell & Audrius Banaitis & Ali Ihtiyar, 2018. "Sustainable Construction Industry in Cambodia: Awareness, Drivers and Barriers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-19, February.
    11. Melanie Stroebel, 2015. "Tourism and the green economy: inspiring or averting change?," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(12), pages 2225-2243, December.
    12. Monasterolo, Irene & Raberto, Marco, 2018. "The EIRIN Flow-of-funds Behavioural Model of Green Fiscal Policies and Green Sovereign Bonds," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 228-243.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhanna A. Mingaleva & Maria V. Sigova, 2022. "Financial Aspects of the Implementation of the Fourth Energy Transition," Finansovyj žhurnal — Financial Journal, Financial Research Institute, Moscow 125375, Russia, issue 5, pages 43-58, October.
    2. Piotr Misztal & Paweł Dziekański, 2023. "Green Economy and Waste Management as Determinants of Modeling Green Capital of Districts in Poland in 2010–2020," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-25, January.
    3. Menghua Deng & Junfei Chen & Feifei Tao & Jiulong Zhu & Min Wang, 2022. "On the Coupling and Coordination Development between Environment and Economy: A Case Study in the Yangtze River Delta of China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-20, January.
    4. Zhanna A. Mingaleva & Yurii V. Starkov, 2020. "The System of Emission Taxation Analyzed: An Institutional Approach," Finansovyj žhurnal — Financial Journal, Financial Research Institute, Moscow 125375, Russia, issue 2, pages 25-38, April.
    5. Shihong Zeng & Gen Li & Shaomin Wu & Zhanfeng Dong, 2022. "The Impact of Green Technology Innovation on Carbon Emissions in the Context of Carbon Neutrality in China: Evidence from Spatial Spillover and Nonlinear Effect Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(2), pages 1-25, January.
    6. Elena Cigu & Mihai-Bogdan Petrișor & Alina-Cristina Nuță & Florian-Marcel Nuță & Ionel Bostan, 2020. "The Nexus between Financial Regulation and Green Sustainable Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-15, October.
    7. Armand Kasztelan, 2021. "On the Road to a Green Economy: How Do European Union Countries ‘Do Their Homework’?," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-16, September.
    8. Paweł Dziekański & Adam Wyszkowski & Piotr Prus & Andrzej Pawlik & Mansoor Maitah & Magdalena Wrońska, 2022. "Zero Waste as a Determinant of Shaping Green Economy Processes on the Example of Communes of Eastern Poland in 2010–2020," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-24, December.
    9. Milan Majerník & Naqib Daneshjo & Peter Malega & Vladimír Rudy & Samer Abdo Saleh Al-Rabeei, 2021. "Environmental Innovation and Green Growth in the Repair and Maintenance of Cars—Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-18, November.
    10. Zhanna A. Mingaleva & Irina A. Nikitina & Inna A. Kruglova, 2023. "On the Feasibility of Using the Environmental Performance Index to Assess the Level of Socio-ecological Development of Russian Regions," Finansovyj žhurnal — Financial Journal, Financial Research Institute, Moscow 125375, Russia, issue 4, pages 98-111, August.
    11. Guoteng Xu & Shuai Peng & Chengjiang Li & Xia Chen, 2023. "Synergistic Evolution of China’s Green Economy and Digital Economy Based on LSTM-GM and Grey Absolute Correlation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-29, September.
    12. Gamze Sart & Yilmaz Bayar & Marina Danilina & Funda Hatice Sezgin, 2022. "Economic Freedom, Education and CO 2 Emissions: A Causality Analysis for EU Member States," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-14, June.
    13. Xiaowen Wang & Shuting Wang & Yunsheng Zhang, 2022. "The Impact of Environmental Regulation and Carbon Emissions on Green Technology Innovation from the Perspective of Spatial Interaction: Empirical Evidence from Urban Agglomeration in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-19, April.
    14. Sung-Lin Hsueh & Yue Sun & Min-Ren Yan, 2019. "Conceptualization and Development of a DFuzzy Model for Low-Carbon Ecocities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-15, October.
    15. Joanna Godlewska & Edyta Sidorczuk-Pietraszko, 2019. "Taxonomic Assessment of Transition to the Green Economy in Polish Regions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-25, September.
    16. Zhanna Mingaleva & Natalia Vukovic & Irina Volkova & Tatiana Salimova, 2019. "Waste Management in Green and Smart Cities: A Case Study of Russia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-17, December.
    17. Karetta Timonen & Anu Reinikainen & Sirpa Kurppa & Inkeri Riipi, 2021. "Key Indicators and Social Acceptance for Bioenergy Production Potential as Part of the Green Economy Transition Process in Local Areas of Lapland," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(2), pages 1-20, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alejandro Padilla-Rivera & Sara Russo-Garrido & Nicolas Merveille, 2020. "Addressing the Social Aspects of a Circular Economy: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-17, September.
    2. Nada Denona Bogovic & Zvonimira Sverko Grdic, 2020. "Transitioning to a Green Economy—Possible Effects on the Croatian Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-19, November.
    3. Yongsheng Sun & Lianjun Tong & Daqian Liu, 2020. "An Empirical Study of the Measurement of Spatial-Temporal Patterns and Obstacles in the Green Development of Northeast China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-19, December.
    4. Lamperti, Francesco & Bosetti, Valentina & Roventini, Andrea & Tavoni, Massimo & Treibich, Tania, 2021. "Three green financial policies to address climate risks," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    5. Kristina Henzler & Stephanie D. Maier & Michael Jäger & Rafael Horn, 2020. "SDG-Based Sustainability Assessment Methodology for Innovations in the Field of Urban Surfaces," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-32, June.
    6. Xing Zhao & Yifan Guo & Zhen Liu & Anteng Xiu, 2023. "Boosting green recovery: the impact of green fiscal policy on green total factor productivity," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 56(4), pages 2601-2619, August.
    7. Datu Buyung Agusdinata & Wenjuan Liu & Sinta Sulistyo & Philippe LeBillon & Je'anne Wegner, 2023. "Evaluating sustainability impacts of critical mineral extractions: Integration of life cycle sustainability assessment and SDGs frameworks," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 27(3), pages 746-759, June.
    8. Emre Arat & Britta Hachenberg & Florian Kiesel & Dirk Schiereck, 2023. "Greenium, credit rating, and the COVID-19 pandemic," Journal of Asset Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 24(7), pages 547-557, December.
    9. Canelli, Rosa & Fontana, Giuseppe & Realfonzo, Riccardo & Passarella, Marco Veronese, 2024. "Energy crisis, economic growth and public finance in Italy," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    10. Sierra-Pérez, Jorge & Rodríguez-Soria, Beatriz & Boschmonart-Rives, Jesús & Gabarrell, Xavier, 2018. "Integrated life cycle assessment and thermodynamic simulation of a public building’s envelope renovation: Conventional vs. Passivhaus proposal," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 1510-1521.
    11. Long Qian & Yunjie Zhou & Ying Sun, 2023. "Regional Differences, Distribution Dynamics, and Convergence of the Green Total Factor Productivity of China’s Cities under the Dual Carbon Targets," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-26, August.
    12. Shuanglian Chen & Zhehao Huang & Benjamin M. Drakeford & Pierre Failler, 2019. "Lending Interest Rate, Loaning Scale, and Government Subsidy Scale in Green Innovation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-22, November.
    13. Dafermos, Yannis & Nikolaidi, Maria, 2022. "Assessing climate policies: an ecological stock–flow consistent perspective," Greenwich Papers in Political Economy 38039, University of Greenwich, Greenwich Political Economy Research Centre.
    14. Joanna Godlewska & Edyta Sidorczuk-Pietraszko, 2019. "Taxonomic Assessment of Transition to the Green Economy in Polish Regions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-25, September.
    15. Huang, Bihong & Punzi, Maria Teresa & Wu, Yu, 2022. "Environmental regulation and financial stability: Evidence from Chinese manufacturing firms," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    16. Antoine GODIN & Emanuele CAMPIGLIO & Eric KEMP-BENEDICT, 2017. "Networks of stranded assets: A case for a balance sheet approach," Working Paper d51a41b5-00ba-40b4-abe6-5, Agence française de développement.
    17. Fernández-Amador, Octavio & Francois, Joseph F. & Oberdabernig, Doris A. & Tomberger, Patrick, 2023. "Energy footprints and the international trade network: A new dataset. Is the European Union doing it better?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 204(PA).
    18. Shuying Wang & Yifei Gao & Hongchang Zhou, 2022. "Research on Green Total Factor Productivity Enhancement Path from the Configurational Perspective—Based on the TOE Theoretical Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-20, October.
    19. Ayomikun Solomon Adewumi & Alex Opoku & Zainab Dangana, 2024. "Sustainability assessment frameworks for delivering Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) targets: A case of Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method (BREEAM) UK New Const," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(5), pages 3779-3791, September.
    20. Hannah Karlewski & Annekatrin Lehmann & Klaus Ruhland & Matthias Finkbeiner, 2019. "A Practical Approach for Social Life Cycle Assessment in the Automotive Industry," Resources, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-60, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:17:p:4629-:d:260924. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.