IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i14p3994-d250968.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of Key Failure Factors in Construction Partnering—A Case Study of Taiwan

Author

Listed:
  • Wei Tong Chen

    (Department of Civil and Construction Engineering/Graduate School of Engineering Science and Technology, National Yunlin University of Science and Technology, 640 Yunlin, Taiwan)

  • Hew Cameron Merrett

    (Graduate School of Engineering Science and Technology, National Yunlin University of Science and Technology, 640 Yunlin, Taiwan)

  • Shih Tong Lu

    (Department of Logistics and Shipping Management, Kainan University, 300 Taoyuan, Taiwan)

  • Leonard Mortis

    (Engineering Department, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Belize, Belmopan 501, Belize)

Abstract

Construction partnering is commonly touted as a win-win arrangement for project owners and contractors alike. The failure or success of construction partnering arrangements is contingent upon a multitude of influences, many of which can be controlled through careful planning and active project management. This study examines the key failure factors (KFFs) of construction partnering projects based on data collected from a survey of industry professionals in Taiwan. Methods: Factor analysis is performed using data gathered from a survey of industry practitioners operating in Taiwan to identify KFFs and better understand the level of significance of each factor. A total of 15 failure variables (FV) were included in the survey. This study applied Principle Components Analysis to classify groups of crucial FV relevant to construction partnering based on their relative perceived contribution to project failure. Study results confirm that there are four KFFs to partnering failure in construction projects; they are absence of agility, collaboration barriers, partnering barriers, and organizational management barriers. The biggest influencer on partnership failure in construction projects is the association between absence of agility and organizational management barriers, while the next most significant is the relationship between collaboration barriers and partnering barriers. Avoiding failure of construction partnering requires careful planning and management considerations of the four KFFs found.

Suggested Citation

  • Wei Tong Chen & Hew Cameron Merrett & Shih Tong Lu & Leonard Mortis, 2019. "Analysis of Key Failure Factors in Construction Partnering—A Case Study of Taiwan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-19, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:14:p:3994-:d:250968
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/14/3994/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/14/3994/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dvir, D. & Lipovetsky, S. & Shenhar, A. & Tishler, A., 1998. "In search of project classification: a non-universal approach to project success factors," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 27(9), pages 915-935, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Muhammad Zeeshan Shaukat & Madiha Saleem & Muhammad Usman Ajmal Mirza & Abdul Basit & Abdul Aziz Khan Niazi, 2023. "Using Interpretive Structural Modelling (ISM) to Impose Hierarchy on Critical Issues of Contractual Bargaining: A Study of Construction Industry of Pakistan," Journal of Policy Research (JPR), Research Foundation for Humanity (RFH), vol. 9(3), pages 69-84.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maqbool, Rashid, 2018. "Efficiency and effectiveness of factors affecting renewable energy projects; an empirical perspective," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 944-956.
    2. Cobo-Benita, José Ramón & Rodríguez-Segura, Enrique & Ortiz-Marcos, Isabel & Ballesteros-Sánchez, Luis, 2016. "Innovation projects performance: Analyzing the impact of organizational characteristics," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(4), pages 1357-1360.
    3. Mahdieh Sabaghpour & Md. Nasiruzzaman & Md. Najibul Huq & Jamaludin Ibrahim, 2013. "Knowledge Management Strategies as a Competitive Advantage for Delivering Professional E-Government Services," Journal of Education and Vocational Research, AMH International, vol. 4(5), pages 134-138.
    4. Achintya Ghatak & Adarsh Garg, 2022. "Power transmission project: a framework to align project success with organization goal," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 13(4), pages 1817-1833, August.
    5. Ahmed S. El Touny & Ahmed H. Ibrahim & Hossam H. Mohamed, 2021. "An Integrated Sustainable Construction Project’s Critical Success Factors (ISCSFs)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-26, August.
    6. Engwall, Mats, 2003. "No project is an island: linking projects to history and context," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(5), pages 789-808, May.
    7. Mahdieh Sabaghpour Azarian & Abdul Rahman Ahmad Dahlan, 2013. "Effectiveness of Knowledge Management in Achieving Success in Malaysian Government Agencies: A Literature Review," Information Management and Business Review, AMH International, vol. 5(7), pages 324-330.
    8. Andreas Blume & Asher Tishler, 2000. "Security Needs and the Performance of the Defense Industry," CIG Working Papers FS IV 00-04, Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin (WZB), Research Unit: Competition and Innovation (CIG).
    9. Markus Schwaninger & Christian Kaiser, 2007. "Erfolgsfaktoren organisatorischen Wandels," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 59(2), pages 150-172, March.
    10. Szymon Zaleski & Rafał Michalski, 2021. "Success Factors in Sustainable Management of IT Service Projects: Exploratory Factor Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-28, April.
    11. Blumer, Yann B. & Stauffacher, Michael & Lang, Daniel J. & Hayashi, Kiyotada & Uchida, Susumu, 2013. "Non-technical success factors for bioenergy projects—Learning from a multiple case study in Japan," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 386-395.
    12. Nightingale, P., 2000. "The product-process-organisation relationship in complex development projects," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 29(7-8), pages 913-930, August.
    13. Kumar Virender & Pandey Amrendra & Singh Rahul, 2023. "Project success and critical success factors of construction projects: project practitioners’ perspectives," Organization, Technology and Management in Construction, Sciendo, vol. 15(1), pages 1-22, January.
    14. Michael T. Pich & Christoph H. Loch & Arnoud De Meyer, 2002. "On Uncertainty, Ambiguity, and Complexity in Project Management," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 48(8), pages 1008-1023, August.
    15. Iyer K. Chandrashekhar & Banerjee Partha S., 2016. "Project ambidexterity: case of recovering schedule delay in a brownfield airport project in India," Organization, Technology and Management in Construction, Sciendo, vol. 8(1), pages 1464-1481, December.
    16. Agata Klaus-Rosińska & Joanna Iwko, 2023. "Success of research projects. Prediction and assessment from the point of view of project stakeholders thereby taking into account a sustainability approach," Operations Research and Decisions, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Management, vol. 33(4), pages 97-118.
    17. Matilda Alexandrova & Daniela Staneva & George Petkov, 2014. "Local and Global Measures for Success and Reconstructive Determination of the Optimal Number of Partners in European Educational Projects," Economic Alternatives, University of National and World Economy, Sofia, Bulgaria, issue 1, pages 63-76, January.
    18. Nien-Tsu Tuan, 2022. "The Other Side of Success Factors—A Systemic Methodology for Exploring Critical Success Factors," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 35(3), pages 441-452, June.
    19. Hanisch, Bastian & Wald, Andreas, 2014. "Effects of complexity on the success of temporary organizations: Relationship quality and transparency as substitutes for formal coordination mechanisms," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 197-213.
    20. Marc Herz & Nicco Krezdorn, 2022. "Epic fail: Exploring project failure’s reasons, outcomes and indicators," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 16(4), pages 1169-1193, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:14:p:3994-:d:250968. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.