IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i14p3846-d248404.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Review of Methodological Choices in LCA-Based Textile and Apparel Rating Tools: Key Issues and Recommendations Relating to Assessment of Fabrics Made From Natural Fibre Types

Author

Listed:
  • K. J. Watson

    (Integrity Ag & Environment, 10511 New England Highway, Highfields QLD 4352, Australia)

  • S. G. Wiedemann

    (Integrity Ag & Environment, 10511 New England Highway, Highfields QLD 4352, Australia)

Abstract

Life cycle assessment (LCA) is a key tool for determining environmental impacts for textiles and apparel and is the basis for the publicly available Higg Material Sustainability Index (MSI) developed by the Sustainable Apparel Coalition (SAC). This paper reviews and evaluates the Higg MSI with respect to rating of fabrics made from natural fibre types, with the aim of providing a constructive analysis of methodological issues identified by comparison with the International Standards and LCA guidelines. The major issues identified by the review were: (1) lack of sufficient guidance for comparative analysis and public disclosure; (2) incomplete system boundaries and the choice of functional unit; (3) the choice of attributional LCA methods and variable methods applied for handling multi-functionality; (4) use of generalised data and small datasets, without reported sensitivity or uncertainty; (5) exclusion of important impact categories, choice of LCIA methods and lack of coverage of non-LCA assessed issues; and (6) the choice of the weighting and normalisation approach. This review found that the provision of, and adherence to the appropriate standards and best practice in LCA would rectify most of these issues. To achieve the laudable aims of the Higg MSI, further development and refinement is needed to ensure robust information is provided to improve the sustainability of textiles.

Suggested Citation

  • K. J. Watson & S. G. Wiedemann, 2019. "Review of Methodological Choices in LCA-Based Textile and Apparel Rating Tools: Key Issues and Recommendations Relating to Assessment of Fabrics Made From Natural Fibre Types," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-16, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:14:p:3846-:d:248404
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/14/3846/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/14/3846/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Annekatrin Lehmann & Vanessa Bach & Matthias Finkbeiner, 2016. "EU Product Environmental Footprint—Mid-Term Review of the Pilot Phase," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-13, January.
    2. Kirsi Laitala & Ingun Grimstad Klepp & Beverley Henry, 2018. "Does Use Matter? Comparison of Environmental Impacts of Clothing Based on Fiber Type," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-25, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zoe Mellick & Alice Payne & Laurie Buys, 2021. "From Fibre to Fashion: Understanding the Value of Sustainability in Global Cotton Textile and Apparel Value Chains," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-21, November.
    2. Emma Johnson & Andrius Plepys, 2021. "Product-Service Systems and Sustainability: Analysing the Environmental Impacts of Rental Clothing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-29, February.
    3. Kirsi Laitala & Ingun Grimstad Klepp, 2020. "What Affects Garment Lifespans? International Clothing Practices Based on a Wardrobe Survey in China, Germany, Japan, the UK, and the USA," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-45, November.
    4. Stephen G. Wiedemann & Quan V. Nguyen & Simon J. Clarke, 2022. "Using LCA and Circularity Indicators to Measure the Sustainability of Textiles—Examples of Renewable and Non-Renewable Fibres," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-14, December.
    5. Rocco Furferi & Yary Volpe & Franco Mantellassi, 2022. "Circular Economy Guidelines for the Textile Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-20, September.
    6. Isabella Bianco & Raffaella Gerboni & Giuseppe Picerno & Gian Andrea Blengini, 2022. "Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of MWool ® Recycled Wool Fibers," Resources, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-16, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Francisco Portillo & Rosa María García & Alfredo Alcayde & José Antonio Gázquez & Manuel Fernández-Ros & Nuria Novas, 2021. "Prospective Environmental and Economic Assessment of a Sensor Network," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-19, September.
    2. Annekatrin Lehmann & Vanessa Bach & Matthias Finkbeiner, 2016. "Product Environmental Footprint (PEF). Fortschritt oder Rückschritt für die Ökobilanzforschung?," Sustainability Nexus Forum, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 83-87, June.
    3. Sarah Gray & Angela Druckman & Jhuma Sadhukhan & Keith James, 2022. "Reducing the Environmental Impact of Clothing: An Exploration of the Potential of Alternative Business Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-24, May.
    4. Piwońska Kalina & Urbańska Michalina & Pilarska Eliza & Miniszewski Maciej & Staniszewski Jakub & Kryszak Łukasz, 2021. "Managing sustainable consumption of durable goods – A systematic literature review," Management, Sciendo, vol. 25(2), pages 73-90, December.
    5. Willem Haanstra & Willem-Jan Rensink & Alberto Martinetti & Jan Braaksma & Leo van Dongen, 2020. "Design for Sustainable Public Transportation: LCA-Based Tooling for Guiding Early Design Priorities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-17, November.
    6. Kirsi Laitala & Ingun Grimstad Klepp & Roy Kettlewell & Stephen Wiedemann, 2020. "Laundry Care Regimes: Do the Practices of Keeping Clothes Clean Have Different Environmental Impacts Based on the Fibre Content?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-31, September.
    7. Wenjun Guo & Eunyoung Kim, 2023. "Categorizing Chinese Consumers’ Behavior to Identify Factors Related to Sustainable Clothing Consumption," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-18, April.
    8. Kirsi Laitala & Ingun Grimstad Klepp, 2020. "What Affects Garment Lifespans? International Clothing Practices Based on a Wardrobe Survey in China, Germany, Japan, the UK, and the USA," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-45, November.
    9. Joanna Helman & Maria Rosienkiewicz & Mariusz Cholewa & Mateusz Molasy & Sylwester Oleszek, 2023. "Towards GreenPLM—Key Sustainable Indicators Selection and Assessment Method Development," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-23, January.
    10. Erik Pauer & Bernhard Wohner & Victoria Heinrich & Manfred Tacker, 2019. "Assessing the Environmental Sustainability of Food Packaging: An Extended Life Cycle Assessment including Packaging-Related Food Losses and Waste and Circularity Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-21, February.
    11. Kirsi Laitala & Ingun Grimstad Klepp, 2019. "Dressing a Demanding Body to Fit In: Clean and Decent with Ostomy or Chronic Skin Disease," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(1), pages 124-135.
    12. Ingun Grimstad Klepp & Kirsi Laitala & Stephen Wiedemann, 2020. "Clothing Lifespans: What Should Be Measured and How," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-21, August.
    13. Yung-Jaan Lee, 2019. "Ecological Footprint and Water Footprint of Taipei," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-16, October.
    14. Francisco Salas-Molina & David Pla-Santamaria & Maria Luisa Vercher-Ferrándiz & Javier Reig-Mullor, 2020. "Inverse Malthusianism and Recycling Economics: The Case of the Textile Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-20, July.
    15. Xiaochen Zhang & Xinyu Liu & Yang Zhang & Xing Xu & Jiaxin Xiao & Ding-Bang Luh, 2023. "Assessing the Feasibility of Practical Cradle to Cradle in Sustainable Conceptual Product Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-32, April.
    16. Benedikt M. Brand & Theresa Maria Rausch & Jannika Brandel, 2022. "The Importance of Sustainability Aspects When Purchasing Online: Comparing Generation X and Generation Z," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-28, May.
    17. Mélanie Schmutz & Roland Hischier & Claudia Som, 2021. "Factors Allowing Users to Influence the Environmental Performance of Their T-Shirt," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-16, February.
    18. Mirella Soyer & Koen Dittrich, 2021. "Sustainable Consumer Behavior in Purchasing, Using and Disposing of Clothes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-17, July.
    19. Vanessa Bach & Markus Berger & Natalia Finogenova & Matthias Finkbeiner, 2017. "Assessing the Availability of Terrestrial Biotic Materials in Product Systems (BIRD)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-35, January.
    20. Vanessa Bach & Nikolay Minkov & Matthias Finkbeiner, 2018. "Assessing the Ability of the Cradle to Cradle Certified™ Products Program to Reliably Determine the Environmental Performance of Products," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-19, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:14:p:3846-:d:248404. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.