IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v10y2018i7p2582-d159564.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quantifying the Economic Effects of Biogas Installations for Organic Waste from Agro-Industrial Sector

Author

Listed:
  • Gabriel Cucui

    (Faculty of Economics, Valahia University of Targoviste, 130004 Târgoviște, Romania)

  • Constantin Aurelian Ionescu

    (Faculty of Economics, Hyperion University of Bucharest, 030615 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Ioana Raluca Goldbach

    (Land Forces Academy N. Balcescu of Sibiu, 550170 Sibiu, Romania)

  • Mihaela Denisa Coman

    (Institute of Multidisciplinary, Research for Science and Technology, Valahia University of Targoviste, 130004 Târgoviște, Romania)

  • Elena Liliana Moiceanu Marin

    (IOSUD, Valahia University of Targoviste, 130105 Târgoviște, Romania)

Abstract

The evolution of the world economy, the continuous growth of human needs and industrial and technological development have led to an increased demand for energy and consumption of fossil fuels. Since fossil resources are limited, there is an urgent need for the evolution of current economies to achieve sustainable development (SD), supported predominantly by waste management, renewable energy production, limiting non-renewable resource consumption, sustainable development, etc. In this research, the management of waste (chicken debris and debris from meat processing/slaughter) resulting from the chicken slaughtering activities using biogas installations (BI) is shown to be a viable alternative that places the economic entity at intercept if waste recycling and the production of electricity, heat and digestate. The purpose of this research was to quantify the economic impact generated using BI, which processes organic wastes resulted from the processing flow of the meat chicken slaughterhouse.

Suggested Citation

  • Gabriel Cucui & Constantin Aurelian Ionescu & Ioana Raluca Goldbach & Mihaela Denisa Coman & Elena Liliana Moiceanu Marin, 2018. "Quantifying the Economic Effects of Biogas Installations for Organic Waste from Agro-Industrial Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-16, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:7:p:2582-:d:159564
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/7/2582/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/7/2582/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Biancamaria Torquati & Sonia Venanzi & Adriano Ciani & Francesco Diotallevi & Vincenzo Tamburi, 2014. "Environmental Sustainability and Economic Benefits of Dairy Farm Biogas Energy Production: A Case Study in Umbria," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(10), pages 1-18, September.
    2. Rolf Meyer, 2017. "Bioeconomy Strategies: Contexts, Visions, Guiding Implementation Principles and Resulting Debates," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-32, June.
    3. Kes McCormick & Niina Kautto, 2013. "The Bioeconomy in Europe: An Overview," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 5(6), pages 1-20, June.
    4. Arshad, Muhammad & Bano, Ijaz & Khan, Nasrullah & Shahzad, Mirza Imran & Younus, Muhammad & Abbas, Mazhar & Iqbal, Munawar, 2018. "Electricity generation from biogas of poultry waste: An assessment of potential and feasibility in Pakistan," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 1241-1246.
    5. Kiyotada Hayashi & Hiroki Hondo & Yue Moriizumi, 2016. "Preference Construction Processes for Renewable Energies: Assessing the Influence of Sustainability Information and Decision Support Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-14, November.
    6. Gebrezgabher, Solomie A. & Meuwissen, Miranda P.M. & Oude Lansink, Alfons G.J.M., 2010. "Costs of Producing Biogas at Dairy Farms in The Netherlands," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 1(1), pages 1-10.
    7. Derek H. Lynch & Rod MacRae & Ralph C. Martin, 2011. "The Carbon and Global Warming Potential Impacts of Organic Farming: Does It Have a Significant Role in an Energy Constrained World?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 3(2), pages 1-41, January.
    8. Budzianowski, Wojciech M. & Budzianowska, Dominika A., 2015. "Economic analysis of biomethane and bioelectricity generation from biogas using different support schemes and plant configurations," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 658-666.
    9. Igliński, Bartłomiej & Buczkowski, Roman & Iglińska, Anna & Cichosz, Marcin & Piechota, Grzegorz & Kujawski, Wojciech, 2012. "Agricultural biogas plants in Poland: Investment process, economical and environmental aspects, biogas potential," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(7), pages 4890-4900.
    10. Henning Wilts & Nadja Von Gries & Bettina Bahn-Walkowiak, 2016. "From Waste Management to Resource Efficiency—The Need for Policy Mixes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1-16, July.
    11. Gelegenis, John & Georgakakis, Dimitris & Angelidaki, Irini & Mavris, Vassilis, 2007. "Optimization of biogas production by co-digesting whey with diluted poultry manure," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(13), pages 2147-2160.
    12. Daniel Pick & Martin Dieterich & Sebastian Heintschel, 2012. "Biogas Production Potential from Economically Usable Green Waste," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 4(4), pages 1-21, April.
    13. Louise Staffas & Mathias Gustavsson & Kes McCormick, 2013. "Strategies and Policies for the Bioeconomy and Bio-Based Economy: An Analysis of Official National Approaches," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 5(6), pages 1-19, June.
    14. Daniel Hausknost & Ernst Schriefl & Christian Lauk & Gerald Kalt, 2017. "A Transition to Which Bioeconomy? An Exploration of Diverging Techno-Political Choices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-22, April.
    15. Elena Simina Lakatos & Viorel Dan & Lucian Ionel Cioca & Laura Bacali & Andreea Maria Ciobanu, 2016. "How Supportive Are Romanian Consumers of the Circular Economy Concept: A Survey," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-17, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Łukasz Sobol & Arkadiusz Dyjakon & Alessandro Suardi & Rainer Preißmann, 2021. "Analysis of the Possibility of Energetic Utilization of Biomass Obtained from Grass Mowing of a Large-Area Golf Course—A Case Study of Tuscany," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-22, September.
    2. Ionica Oncioiu & Ovidiu Constantin Bunget & Mirela Cătălina Türkeș & Sorinel Căpușneanu & Dan Ioan Topor & Attila Szora Tamaș & Ileana-Sorina Rakoș & Mihaela Ștefan Hint, 2019. "The Impact of Big Data Analytics on Company Performance in Supply Chain Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-22, September.
    3. Wojciech Golimowski & Paweł Krzaczek & Damian Marcinkowski & Weronika Gracz & Grzegorz Wałowski, 2019. "Impact of Biogas and Waste Fats Methyl Esters on NO, NO 2 , CO, and PM Emission by Dual Fuel Diesel Engine," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-16, March.
    4. Kamila Klimek & Magdalena Kapłan & Serhiy Syrotyuk & Nikolay Bakach & Nikolay Kapustin & Ryszard Konieczny & Jakub Dobrzyński & Kinga Borek & Dorota Anders & Barbara Dybek & Agnieszka Karwacka & Grzeg, 2021. "Investment Model of Agricultural Biogas Plants for Individual Farms in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-30, November.
    5. Achinas, Spyridon & Willem Euverink, Gerrit Jan, 2020. "Rambling facets of manure-based biogas production in Europe: A briefing," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    6. Ning Li & He Huang & Xueyuan Wang & Baohua Yuan & Yi Liu & Shoukun Xu, 2022. "Detection of Floating Garbage on Water Surface Based on PC-Net," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-16, September.
    7. Henrique Oliveira & Víctor Moutinho, 2021. "Renewable Energy, Economic Growth and Economic Development Nexus: A Bibliometric Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-28, July.
    8. Gürel Soyer & Ersel Yilmaz, 2020. "Waste Management in Dairy Cattle Farms in Aydın Region. Potential of Energy Application," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-11, February.
    9. Constantin Aurelian Ionescu & Mihaela Denisa Coman & Elena Liliana Moiceanu Marin & Liliana Paschia & Nicoleta Luminita Gudanescu Nicolau & Gabriel Cucui & Dan Marius Coman & Sorina Geanina Stanescu, 2019. "The Analysis of the Economic Effects on the Greening and Recovery of the Sludge Waste Resulting from the Biogas Production Activity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-19, September.
    10. Magdalena Kapłan & Kamila Klimek & Grzegorz Maj & Dmytro Zhuravel & Andrii Bondar & Viktoriia Lemeshchenko-Lagoda & Boris Boltianskyi & Larysa Boltianska & Hanna Syrotyuk & Serhiy Syrotyuk & Ryszard K, 2022. "Method of Evaluation of Materials Wear of Cylinder-Piston Group of Diesel Engines in the Biodiesel Fuel Environment," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-28, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lisa Biber-Freudenberger & Amit Kumar Basukala & Martin Bruckner & Jan Börner, 2018. "Sustainability Performance of National Bio-Economies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-20, August.
    2. Manuel Hafner & Lukas Fehr & Jan Springorum & Artur Petkau & Reinhard Johler, 2020. "Perceptions of Bioeconomy and the Desire for Governmental Action: Regional Actors’ Connotations of Wood-Based Bioeconomy in Germany," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-13, November.
    3. Juha Peltomaa, 2018. "Drumming the Barrels of Hope? Bioeconomy Narratives in the Media," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-14, November.
    4. Valeria Ferreira Gregorio & Laia Pié & Antonio Terceño, 2018. "A Systematic Literature Review of Bio, Green and Circular Economy Trends in Publications in the Field of Economics and Business Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-39, November.
    5. Tobias Stern & Ursula Ploll & Raphael Spies & Peter Schwarzbauer & Franziska Hesser & Lea Ranacher, 2018. "Understanding Perceptions of the Bioeconomy in Austria—An Explorative Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-17, November.
    6. Carmen Priefer & Rolf Meyer, 2019. "One Concept, Many Opinions: How Scientists in Germany Think About the Concept of Bioeconomy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-21, August.
    7. Befort, N., 2020. "Going beyond definitions to understand tensions within the bioeconomy: The contribution of sociotechnical regimes to contested fields," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    8. George B. Frisvold & Steven M. Moss & Andrea Hodgson & Mary E. Maxon, 2021. "Understanding the U.S. Bioeconomy: A New Definition and Landscape," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-24, February.
    9. Walther Zeug & Alberto Bezama & Urs Moesenfechtel & Anne Jähkel & Daniela Thrän, 2019. "Stakeholders’ Interests and Perceptions of Bioeconomy Monitoring Using a Sustainable Development Goal Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-24, March.
    10. Zeug, Walther & Bezama, Alberto & Thrän, Daniela, 2020. "Towards a holistic and integrated Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment of the bioeconomy: Background on concepts, visions and measurements," UFZ Discussion Papers 7/2020, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ), Division of Social Sciences (ÖKUS).
    11. Leonard Prochaska & Daniel Schiller, 2021. "An evolutionary perspective on the emergence and implementation of mission-oriented innovation policy: the example of the change of the leitmotif from biotechnology to bioeconomy," Review of Evolutionary Political Economy, Springer, vol. 2(1), pages 141-249, April.
    12. Sebastian Hinderer & Leif Brändle & Andreas Kuckertz, 2021. "Transition to a Sustainable Bioeconomy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-16, July.
    13. Christina-Ioanna Papadopoulou & Efstratios Loizou & Katerina Melfou & Fotios Chatzitheodoridis, 2021. "The Knowledge Based Agricultural Bioeconomy: A Bibliometric Network Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-15, October.
    14. Andrew M. Neill & Cathal O’Donoghue & Jane C. Stout, 2020. "A Natural Capital Lens for a Sustainable Bioeconomy: Determining the Unrealised and Unrecognised Services from Nature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-24, September.
    15. Sophia Dieken & Sandra Venghaus, 2020. "Potential Pathways to the German Bioeconomy: A Media Discourse Analysis of Public Perceptions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-24, September.
    16. Block, Carolin & Wustmans, Michael & Laibach, Natalie & Bröring, Stefanie, 2021. "Semantic bridging of patents and scientific publications – The case of an emerging sustainability-oriented technology," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    17. Durwin H.J. Lynch & Pim Klaassen & Lan van Wassenaer & Jacqueline E.W. Broerse, 2020. "Constructing the Public in Roadmapping the Transition to a Bioeconomy: A Case Study from the Netherlands," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-18, April.
    18. Giurca, Alexandru & Befort, Nicolas, 2023. "Deconstructing substitution narratives: The case of bioeconomy innovations from the forest-based sector," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    19. Schulz, Nicolai & Proestou, Maria & Feindt, Peter, 2023. "Resilience Challenge Salience in Bioeconomy Policies: A Global Analysis," SocArXiv rp2by, Center for Open Science.
    20. Laibach, Natalie & Börner, Jan & Bröring, Stefanie, 2019. "Exploring the future of the bioeconomy: An expert-based scoping study examining key enabling technology fields with potential to foster the transition toward a bio-based economy," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:7:p:2582-:d:159564. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.