IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v10y2018i7p2321-d156270.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Model of Optimal Allocation of Maritime Oil Spill Combat Ships

Author

Listed:
  • Kinga Łazuga

    (Institute of Marine Navigation, Maritime University of Szczecin, 70-500 Szczecin, Poland)

  • Lucjan Gucma

    (Institute of Marine Traffic Engineering, Maritime University of Szczecin, 70-500 Szczecin, Poland)

  • Marko Perkovic

    (Faculty of Maritime Studies and Transport, University of Ljubljana, 6320 Portoroz, Slovenia)

Abstract

The paper describes a two-stage method for optimizing the location of marine oil spill combat forces and assessing the costs related to this action at the sea. An optimization problem relates to positioning the oil pollution combat ships in ports in such a way that they are able combat the anticipated number of oil spills in certain positions in the Polish coast of the Baltic Sea area in the shortest possible time. The problem was classified as NP-hard; therefore, in the first stage, an evolutionary algorithm was applied. The main output of the model based on the evolutionary algorithm is the time of arrival of combat ships from the port to the oil spill area, as well as the costs of such operation; this is defined as the aim function. The first stage of the model does not simulate combat pollution action; therefore, the results obtained were treated as approximate. In the second stage, the several best allocations of oil spill response resources obtained in the first stage were used as input to a detailed simulation model of combat action. For each chosen allocation, a number of oil combat action simulations were carried out. The model can be used to create and verify oil pollution contingency plans, and finally increase the sustainability of sea and coastal areas.

Suggested Citation

  • Kinga Łazuga & Lucjan Gucma & Marko Perkovic, 2018. "The Model of Optimal Allocation of Maritime Oil Spill Combat Ships," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-19, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:7:p:2321-:d:156270
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/7/2321/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/7/2321/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Harilaos N. Psaraftis & Geverghese G. Tharakan & Avishai Ceder, 1986. "Optimal Response to Oil Spills: The Strategic Decision Case," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 34(2), pages 203-217, April.
    2. Diana Mariana Cocârţă & Mihaela Alexandra Stoian & Aykan Karademir, 2017. "Crude Oil Contaminated Sites: Evaluation by Using Risk Assessment Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-16, August.
    3. Ling Cai & Li Yan & Jialin Ni & Cui Wang, 2015. "Assessment of Ecological Vulnerability under Oil Spill Stress," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(10), pages 1-12, September.
    4. Verma, Manish & Gendreau, Michel & Laporte, Gilbert, 2013. "Optimal location and capability of oil-spill response facilities for the south coast of Newfoundland," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 41(5), pages 856-867.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sarhadi, Hassan & Naoum-Sawaya, Joe & Verma, Manish, 2020. "A robust optimization approach to locating and stockpiling marine oil-spill response facilities," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    2. Garrett, Richard A. & Sharkey, Thomas C. & Grabowski, Martha & Wallace, William A., 2017. "Dynamic resource allocation to support oil spill response planning for energy exploration in the Arctic," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 257(1), pages 272-286.
    3. Yue Chen & Kangning Xiong & Xiaodong Ren & Cai Cheng, 2021. "Vulnerability Comparison between Karst and Non-Karst Nature Reserves—With a Special Reference to Guizhou Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-12, February.
    4. Rafiei, Rezvan & Huang, Kai & Verma, Manish, 2022. "Cash versus in-kind transfer programs in humanitarian operations: An optimization program and a case study," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 82(PA).
    5. Srinivasa, Anand V. & Wilhelm, Wilbert E., 1997. "A procedure for optimizing tactical response in oil spill clean up operations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 102(3), pages 554-574, November.
    6. Wenshuai Wu & Yi Peng, 2016. "Extension of grey relational analysis for facilitating group consensus to oil spill emergency management," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 238(1), pages 615-635, March.
    7. Wenshuai Wu & Yi Peng, 2016. "Extension of grey relational analysis for facilitating group consensus to oil spill emergency management," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 238(1), pages 615-635, March.
    8. Altay, Nezih & Green III, Walter G., 2006. "OR/MS research in disaster operations management," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 175(1), pages 475-493, November.
    9. Alberto Diantini & Salvatore Eugenio Pappalardo & Tim Edwards Powers & Daniele Codato & Giuseppe Della Fera & Marco Heredia-R & Francesco Facchinelli & Edoardo Crescini & Massimo De Marchi, 2020. "Is this a Real Choice? Critical Exploration of the Social License to Operate in the Oil Extraction Context of the Ecuadorian Amazon," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-24, October.
    10. Afshartous, David & Guan, Yongtao & Mehrotra, Anuj, 2009. "US Coast Guard air station location with respect to distress calls: A spatial statistics and optimization based methodology," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 196(3), pages 1086-1096, August.
    11. Iakovou, Eleftherios & Ip, Chi M. & Douligeris, Christos & Korde, Ashutosh, 1997. "Optimal location and capacity of emergency cleanup equipment for oil spill response," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 96(1), pages 72-80, January.
    12. Bieniek, Milena, 2015. "A note on the facility location problem with stochastic demands," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 53-60.
    13. Irina Aura Istrate & Diana Mariana Cocârță & Zucheng Wu & Mihaela Alexandra Stoian, 2018. "Minimizing the Health Risks from Hydrocarbon Contaminated Soils by Using Electric Field-Based Treatment for Soil Remediation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-13, January.
    14. Eskandarpour, Majid & Dejax, Pierre & Miemczyk, Joe & Péton, Olivier, 2015. "Sustainable supply chain network design: An optimization-oriented review," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 11-32.
    15. Caunhye, Aakil M. & Nie, Xiaofeng & Pokharel, Shaligram, 2012. "Optimization models in emergency logistics: A literature review," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 4-13.
    16. Laijun Zhao & Ying Qian & Qing-Mi Hu & Ran Jiang & Meiting Li & Xulei Wang, 2018. "An Analysis of Hazardous Chemical Accidents in China between 2006 and 2017," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-18, August.
    17. Verma, Manish & Gendreau, Michel & Laporte, Gilbert, 2013. "Optimal location and capability of oil-spill response facilities for the south coast of Newfoundland," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 41(5), pages 856-867.
    18. Rezaei-Malek, Mohammad & Torabi, S. Ali & Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, Reza, 2019. "Prioritizing disaster-prone areas for large-scale earthquakes' preparedness: Methodology and application," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 9-25.
    19. Rezaei-Malek, Mohammad & Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, Reza & Cheikhrouhou, Naoufel & Taheri-Moghaddam, Alireza, 2016. "An approximation approach to a trade-off among efficiency, efficacy, and balance for relief pre-positioning in disaster management," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 485-509.
    20. Hye-Jeong Lee & Hyo-Jin Kim & Seung-Hoon Yoo, 2018. "The Public Value of Reducing the Incidence of Oil Spill Accidents in Korean Rivers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-12, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:7:p:2321-:d:156270. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.