IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v10y2018i7p2194-d154721.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analyzing Transfer Commuting Attitudes Using a Market Segmentation Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Jiao Ye

    (School of Transportation, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China)

  • Jun Chen

    (School of Transportation, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China)

  • Hua Bai

    (China Design Group Co., Ltd., Nanjing 210014, China)

  • Yifan Yue

    (School of Transportation, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China)

Abstract

Commuting by transfer in the public transit network is a green travel choice compared to private cars which should be encouraged when direct transit lines cannot take the commuters to their destinations. Therefore, transfer commuting attitudes are important for finding appropriate ways to attract more transfer commuters. Firstly, since attitudes are usually unobserved, a combined revealed preference (RP) and stated preference (SP) survey was conducted in Nanjing, China to obtain the observed attitudinal variables. Then the market segmentation approach including the factor analysis, the structural equation modelling (SEM) model and the K-means clustering method was used to identify the underlying attitudinal factors and variables and analyze the interrelationship between them. Six segments were identified by four key factors including the willingness to transfer, the sensitivity to time, the need for flexibility and the desire for comfort. The sensitivity to time is the most important factor for commuters influencing their willingness to transfer. The socio-economic features of each segment were also analyzed and compared. The result shows that socio-economic features have a great impact on the willingness to transfer. Corresponding policy and strategy implications to increase transfer commuting proportion were finally proposed.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiao Ye & Jun Chen & Hua Bai & Yifan Yue, 2018. "Analyzing Transfer Commuting Attitudes Using a Market Segmentation Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-16, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:7:p:2194-:d:154721
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/7/2194/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/7/2194/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shiftan, Yoram & Outwater, Maren L. & Zhou, Yushuang, 2008. "Transit market research using structural equation modeling and attitudinal market segmentation," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 15(3), pages 186-195, May.
    2. Subeh Chowdhury & Avishai Ceder & Ripul Sachdeva, 2014. "The effects of planned and unplanned transfers on public transport users' perception of transfer routes," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(2), pages 154-168, March.
    3. Caiyun Qian & Yang Zhou & Jiadeng Chen, 2017. "The Coupling Strategy Research of Urban Public Space and Traffic for Improving the Residents’ Low-Carbon Travel Accessibility: A Case Study of Hexi New City Central Area in Nanjing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-23, November.
    4. Tilahun, Nebiyou Y. & Levinson, David M. & Krizek, Kevin J., 2007. "Trails, lanes, or traffic: Valuing bicycle facilities with an adaptive stated preference survey," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 41(4), pages 287-301, May.
    5. Vande Walle, Stefaan & Steenberghen, Therese, 2006. "Space and time related determinants of public transport use in trip chains," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 40(2), pages 151-162, February.
    6. Yanjie Ji & Xinwei Ma & Mingyuan Yang & Yuchuan Jin & Liangpeng Gao, 2018. "Exploring Spatially Varying Influences on Metro-Bikeshare Transfer: A Geographically Weighted Poisson Regression Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-23, May.
    7. Arentze, Theo A. & Molin, Eric J.E., 2013. "Travelers’ preferences in multimodal networks: Design and results of a comprehensive series of choice experiments," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 15-28.
    8. Schakenbos, Rik & Paix, Lissy La & Nijenstein, Sandra & Geurs, Karst T., 2016. "Valuation of a transfer in a multimodal public transport trip," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 72-81.
    9. Ledyard Tucker & Charles Lewis, 1973. "A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 38(1), pages 1-10, March.
    10. Nebiyou Tilahun & Kevin Krizek & David Levinson, 2007. "Trails, Lanes, or Traffic: Value of Different Bicycle Facilities Using Adaptive Stated-Preference Survey," Working Papers 200701, University of Minnesota: Nexus Research Group.
    11. Cheng, Yung-Hsiang & Tseng, Wei-Chih, 2016. "Exploring the effects of perceived values, free bus transfer, and penalties on intermodal metro–bus transfer users' intention," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 127-138.
    12. Garcia-Martinez, Andres & Cascajo, Rocio & Jara-Diaz, Sergio R. & Chowdhury, Subeh & Monzon, Andres, 2018. "Transfer penalties in multimodal public transport networks," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 114(PA), pages 52-66.
    13. Guo, Zhan & Wilson, Nigel H.M., 2011. "Assessing the cost of transfer inconvenience in public transport systems: A case study of the London Underground," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 45(2), pages 91-104, February.
    14. Li, Zhibin & Wang, Wei & Yang, Chen & Ragland, David R., 2013. "Bicycle commuting market analysis using attitudinal market segmentation approach," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 56-68.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Agnieszka Wojewódzka-Wiewiórska & Anna Kłoczko-Gajewska & Piotr Sulewski, 2019. "Between the Social and Economic Dimensions of Sustainability in Rural Areas—In Search of Farmers’ Quality of Life," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-26, December.
    2. Jindamas Sutthichaimethee & Kuskana Kubaha, 2018. "The Relationship of Causal Factors Affecting the Future Equilibrium Change of Total Final Energy Consumption in Thailand’s Construction Sector under a Sustainable Development Goal: Enriching the SE-VA," Resources, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-18, December.
    3. Laura Heubeck & Franziska Hartwich & Franziska Bocklisch, 2023. "To Share or Not to Share—Expected Transportation Mode Changes Given Different Types of Fully Automated Vehicles," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-25, March.
    4. John Zacharias & Xinyi Liu, 2022. "The Role of the Access Environment in Metro Commute Travel Satisfaction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-18, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jara-Diaz, Sergio & Monzon, Andres & Cascajo, Rocio & Garcia-Martinez, Andres, 2022. "An international time equivalency of the pure transfer penalty in urban transit trips: Closing the gap," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 48-55.
    2. Timmer, Sebastian & Merfeld, Katrin & Henkel, Sven, 2023. "Exploring motivations for multimodal commuting: A hierarchical means-end chain analysis," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    3. Nielsen, Otto Anker & Eltved, Morten & Anderson, Marie Karen & Prato, Carlo Giacomo, 2021. "Relevance of detailed transfer attributes in large-scale multimodal route choice models for metropolitan public transport passengers," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 76-92.
    4. Garcia-Martinez, Andres & Cascajo, Rocio & Jara-Diaz, Sergio R. & Chowdhury, Subeh & Monzon, Andres, 2018. "Transfer penalties in multimodal public transport networks," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 114(PA), pages 52-66.
    5. Liu, Yang & Feng, Tao & Shi, Zhuangbin & He, Mingwei, 2022. "Understanding the route choice behaviour of metro-bikeshare users," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 460-475.
    6. Habib, Khandker Nurul & Mann, Jenessa & Mahmoud, Mohamed & Weiss, Adam, 2014. "Synopsis of bicycle demand in the City of Toronto: Investigating the effects of perception, consciousness and comfortability on the purpose of biking and bike ownership," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 67-80.
    7. Nkurunziza, Alphonse & Zuidgeest, Mark & Brussel, Mark & Van Maarseveen, Martin, 2012. "Examining the potential for modal change: Motivators and barriers for bicycle commuting in Dar-es-Salaam," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 249-259.
    8. Creemers, Lieve & Tormans, Hans & Bellemans, Tom & Janssens, Davy & Wets, Geert & Cools, Mario, 2015. "Knowledge of the concept Light Rail Transit: Exploring its relevance and identification of the determinants of various knowledge levels," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 31-43.
    9. Damant-Sirois, Gabriel & El-Geneidy, Ahmed M., 2015. "Who cycles more? Determining cycling frequency through a segmentation approach in Montreal, Canada," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 113-125.
    10. Tomhave, Benjamin J. & Khani, Alireza, 2022. "Refined choice set generation and the investigation of multi-criteria transit route choice behavior," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 484-500.
    11. Liao, Feixiong & Tian, Qiong & Arentze, Theo & Huang, Hai-Jun & Timmermans, Harry J.P., 2020. "Travel preferences of multimodal transport systems in emerging markets: The case of Beijing," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 250-266.
    12. Espino, Raquel & Román, Concepción, 2020. "Valuation of transfer for bus users: The case of Gran Canaria," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 131-144.
    13. Lois, David & Monzón, Andrés & Hernández, Sara, 2018. "Analysis of satisfaction factors at urban transport interchanges: Measuring travellers’ attitudes to information, security and waiting," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 49-56.
    14. Downward, Paul & Rasciute, Simona, 2015. "Assessing the impact of the National Cycle Network and physical activity lifestyle on cycling behaviour in England," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 425-437.
    15. van Wee, Bert & Bohte, Wendy & Molin, Eric & Arentze, Theo & Liao, Feixiong, 2014. "Policies for synchronization in the transport–land-use system," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 1-9.
    16. Pucher, John & Buehler, Ralph & Seinen, Mark, 2011. "Bicycling renaissance in North America? An update and re-appraisal of cycling trends and policies," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 45(6), pages 451-475, July.
    17. Zhi Dong & Jiaqi Zhang & Xiaoqi Gong & Laijun Wang, 2024. "The Role of Smart Travel Service in Intercity Travel Satisfaction: Does Traveler Heterogeneity Matter?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-16, August.
    18. Anowar, Sabreena & Eluru, Naveen & Hatzopoulou, Marianne, 2017. "Quantifying the value of a clean ride: How far would you bicycle to avoid exposure to traffic-related air pollution?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 66-78.
    19. Ehrgott, Matthias & Wang, Judith Y.T. & Raith, Andrea & van Houtte, Chris, 2012. "A bi-objective cyclist route choice model," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 46(4), pages 652-663.
    20. Ying Ni & Jiaqi Chen, 2020. "Exploring the Effects of the Built Environment on Two Transfer Modes for Metros: Dockless Bike Sharing and Taxis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-20, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:7:p:2194-:d:154721. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.