IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v10y2018i5p1319-d143001.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing the Needs and Gaps of Building Information Technologies for Energy Retrofit of Historic Buildings in the Korean Context

Author

Listed:
  • Sean Hay Kim

    (School of Architecture, Seoul National University of Science and Technology, Seoul 01811, Korea)

Abstract

Most domestic modern buildings from the early 1900s have been constructed as heavy mass, and for many years have relied on passive measures for climate control. Since effective passive measures eventually reduce the heating and cooling loads, thus also reducing the system size, passive and hybrid measures are the most preferred Energy Conservation Measures (ECMs). In addition, the domestic situation and climate are additional constraints in energy retrofit decision making, such as a shorter budget and time, poor maintenance history, and uncertainties in vernacular lifestyle. For this reason, the performance improvement and side-effects prior to installing ECMs should be predictable, particularly in case the originality can be damaged. This complexity confirms that simulation-based Measurement and Verification (M&V) would better suit the energy retrofit of domestic historic buildings. However, many domestic investors still believe re-construction has a larger economic value than restoration. Therefore, they are even unwilling to invest in more time than a preset audit period—typically less than a week. Although simulation-based M&V is theoretically favored for retrofit decision making, its process including collecting data, modeling and analysis, and evaluating and designing ECMs could still be too demanding to domestic practitioners. While some manual, repetitive, error-prone works exist in the conventional retrofit process and simulation-based M&V, it is proposed here that enhanced Building Information Technology (BIT) is able to simplify, automate, and objectify, at least the critical steps of the retrofit project. The aim of this study is to find an efficient and effective energy retrofit strategy for domestic historic buildings that appeals to both domestic investors and practitioners by testing selective BIT tools on an actual historic building. This study concludes with the suggestion that software vendors are asked to develop enhanced features to resolve users’ pending demands. It is also suggested that, in the domestic context, how the current practice for each process of the energy retrofit of historic buildings needs to shift to take a full advantage of BIT.

Suggested Citation

  • Sean Hay Kim, 2018. "Assessing the Needs and Gaps of Building Information Technologies for Energy Retrofit of Historic Buildings in the Korean Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-33, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:5:p:1319-:d:143001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/5/1319/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/5/1319/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tiziana Basiricò & Daniele Enea, 2018. "Seismic and Energy Retrofit of the Historic Urban Fabric of Enna (Italy)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-20, April.
    2. Luca Evangelisti & Claudia Guattari & Paola Gori, 2015. "Energy Retrofit Strategies for Residential Building Envelopes: An Italian Case Study of an Early-50s Building," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(8), pages 1-16, August.
    3. Mariangela De Vita & Antonio Mannella & Antonio Sabino & Alessio Marchetti, 2018. "Seismic Retrofit Measures for Masonry Walls of Historical Buildings, from an Energy Saving Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-17, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fatma Seyma Keskin & Pedro Martinez-Vazquez & Charalampos Baniotopoulos, 2021. "An Integrated Method to Evaluate Sustainability for Vulnerable Buildings Addressing Life Cycle Embodied Impacts and Resource Use," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-25, September.
    2. Kheira Anissa Tabet Aoul & Rahma Hagi & Rahma Abdelghani & Monaya Syam & Boshra Akhozheya, 2021. "Building Envelope Thermal Defects in Existing and Under-Construction Housing in the UAE; Infrared Thermography Diagnosis and Qualitative Impacts Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-23, February.
    3. Maatouk Khoukhi & Abeer Fuad Darsaleh & Sara Ali, 2020. "Retrofitting an Existing Office Building in the UAE Towards Achieving Low-Energy Building," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-16, March.
    4. Fabio Bisegna & Benedetta Mattoni & Paola Gori & Francesco Asdrubali & Claudia Guattari & Luca Evangelisti & Sara Sambuco & Francesco Bianchi, 2016. "Influence of Insulating Materials on Green Building Rating System Results," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-17, September.
    5. Mariangela De Vita & Giulia Massari & Pierluigi De Berardinis, 2020. "Retrofit Methodology Based on Energy Simulation Modeling Applied for the Enhancement of a Historical Building in L’Aquila," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-26, June.
    6. Carlo Andrea Bollino & Francesco Asdrubali & Paolo Polinori & Simona Bigerna & Silvia Micheli & Claudia Guattari & Antonella Rotili, 2017. "A Note on Medium- and Long-Term Global Energy Prospects and Scenarios," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-25, May.
    7. Artur Wyrwa & Yi-kuang Chen, 2017. "Mapping Urban Heat Demand with the Use of GIS-Based Tools," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-15, May.
    8. Angela Moschella & Antonio Gagliano & Alessandro Lo Faro & Attilio Mondello & Angelo Salemi & Giulia Sanfilippo, 2018. "A Methodology for an Integrated Approach for Seismic and Energy Refurbishment of Historic Buildings in Mediterranean Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-22, July.
    9. L. Gerardo F. Salazar & Tiago Miguel Ferreira, 2020. "Seismic Vulnerability Assessment of Historic Constructions in the Downtown of Mexico City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-21, February.
    10. María Beatriz Piderit & Susan Agurto & Laura Marín-Restrepo, 2019. "Reconciling Energy and Heritage: Retrofit of Heritage Buildings in Contexts of Energy Vulnerability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-20, February.
    11. Paola Marrone & Paola Gori & Francesco Asdrubali & Luca Evangelisti & Laura Calcagnini & Gianluca Grazieschi, 2018. "Energy Benchmarking in Educational Buildings through Cluster Analysis of Energy Retrofitting," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-20, March.
    12. Pierluigi De Berardinis & Marianna Rotilio & Luisa Capannolo, 2017. "Energy and Sustainable Strategies in the Renovation of Existing Buildings: An Italian Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-20, August.
    13. Jeong-Heum Cho & Sangmu Bae & Yujin Nam, 2023. "Analysis of the Energy and Economic Effects of Green Remodeling for Old Buildings: A Case Study of Public Daycare Centers in South Korea," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-25, June.
    14. Fabio Nardecchia & Benedetta Mattoni & Francesca Pagliaro & Lucia Cellucci & Fabio Bisegna & Franco Gugliermetti, 2016. "Computational Fluid Dynamic Modelling of Thermal Periodic Stabilized Regime in Passive Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-18, November.
    15. Paolo Maria Congedo & Delia D’Agostino & Cristina Baglivo & Giuliano Tornese & Ilaria Zacà, 2016. "Efficient Solutions and Cost-Optimal Analysis for Existing School Buildings," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-24, October.
    16. Alessio Miatto & Claudia Sartori & Martina Bianchi & Paolo Borin & Andrea Giordano & Shoshanna Saxe & T.E. Graedel, 2022. "Tracking the material cycle of Italian bricks with the aid of building information modeling," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(2), pages 609-626, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:5:p:1319-:d:143001. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.