IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v10y2018i3p872-d136979.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Study on the Interrelations of Decision-Making Factors of Information System (IS) Upgrades for Sustainable Business Using Interpretive Structural Modeling and MICMAC Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Dosung Kim

    (Department of Computer Science, Graduate School, Soongsil University, Seoul 06978, Korea)

  • Yonghee Kim

    (College of Business Administration, Soongsil University, Seoul 06978, Korea)

  • Namyong Lee

    (Department of Computer Science, School of Software, Soongsil University, Seoul 06978, Korea)

Abstract

An information system (IS) upgrade is an essential way to enhance the competitiveness of an organization. Specifically, the decision making processes surrounding IS upgrades is one of the most important parts of an organization’s competitiveness in regard to business sustainability. Previous research studies on IS upgrade decisions have focused on implementing a more efficient decision-making system by determining when IS upgrades should be performed based on the cost factor, from the perspective of both users and experts. However, if the decision making of an IS upgrade is delayed or not performed accurately due to the limitations of a specific business environment, such as a job, position, or cost, an organization can lose its business competitiveness. In this context, the present study determines the main factors involved in decision making processes surrounding IS upgrades, and analyzes the interrelations among these factors in an organization with regard to users, managers, and experts. The interpretive structural modeling (ISM) method is used as an analytical tool to analyze the characteristics and interrelations of factors based on a real system model called the User-Centered Training System (UCTS). Based on the results, the present study provides a deeper insight into decision-making factors and directional models, and allows for a more efficient management of the decision-making problem of an IS upgrade caused by differences in the business environment between each layer (i.e., users, managers, and experts). Specifically, according to our results, users are more likely to think about the positive effects and benefits they could have on their work, rather than about organizational benefits. By contrast, managers reason that IS upgrades should have a positive impact on the overall organizational goals and benefits. Finally, experts think that an IS upgrade should benefit both the organization and users. Taken together, the results of the present study are meaningful in that they clearly show the interrelationships between the decision-making factors on each of the levels.

Suggested Citation

  • Dosung Kim & Yonghee Kim & Namyong Lee, 2018. "A Study on the Interrelations of Decision-Making Factors of Information System (IS) Upgrades for Sustainable Business Using Interpretive Structural Modeling and MICMAC Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-20, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:3:p:872-:d:136979
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/3/872/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/3/872/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alok Kumar Singh & Sushil, 2013. "Modeling enablers of TQM to improve airline performance," International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 62(3), pages 250-275, March.
    2. Teresa M. Shaft & Mark P. Sharfman & Magnus Swahn, 2001. "Using Interorganizational Information Systems to Support Environmental Management Efforts at ASG," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 5(4), pages 95-115, October.
    3. Wainwright, Charles E. R. & Reynolds, Katherine A. & Argument, Lisa J., 2003. "Optimising strategic information system development," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 56(2), pages 127-134, February.
    4. Ansari, Md. Fahim & Kharb, Ravinder Kumar & Luthra, Sunil & Shimmi, S.L. & Chatterji, S., 2013. "Analysis of barriers to implement solar power installations in India using interpretive structural modeling technique," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 163-174.
    5. Wu, Wei-Shing & Yang, Chen-Feng & Chang, Jung-Chuan & Château, Pierre-Alexandre & Chang, Yang-Chi, 2015. "Risk assessment by integrating interpretive structural modeling and Bayesian network, case of offshore pipeline project," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 515-524.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Natasa Djalic & Milan Nikolic & Mihalj Bakator & Zivko Erceg, 2021. "Modeling the Influence of Information Systems on Sustainable Business Performance and Competitiveness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-24, August.
    2. Han, Qingye & Zhu, Yuming & Ke, Ginger Y. & Hipel, Keith W., 2019. "Public private partnership in brownfield remediation projects in China: Identification and structure analysis of risks," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 87-104.
    3. Naim Ahmad & Noorulhasan Naveed Quadri & Mohamed Rafik N. Qureshi & Mohammad Mahtab Alam, 2018. "Relationship Modeling of Critical Success Factors for Enhancing Sustainability and Performance in E-Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-16, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jitendra Narayan Biswal & Kamalakanta Muduli & Suchismita Satapathy & Devendra K. Yadav, 2019. "A TISM based study of SSCM enablers: an Indian coal- fired thermal power plant perspective," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 10(1), pages 126-141, February.
    2. Qazi, Abroon & Dickson, Alex & Quigley, John & Gaudenzi, Barbara, 2018. "Supply chain risk network management: A Bayesian belief network and expected utility based approach for managing supply chain risks," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 24-42.
    3. Mukisa, Nicholas & Zamora, Ramon & Lie, Tek Tjing, 2020. "Assessment of community sustainable livelihoods capitals for the implementation of alternative energy technologies in Uganda – Africa," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 886-902.
    4. K. Arunprasath & S. Bathrinath & R. K. A. Bhalaji & Koppiahraj Karuppiah & Anish Nair, 2023. "An integrated approach to modelling of barriers in implementation of cellular manufacturing systems in production industries," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 14(4), pages 1370-1378, August.
    5. Rajvikram Madurai Elavarasan & G. M. Shafiullah & Nallapaneni Manoj Kumar & Sanjeevikumar Padmanaban, 2019. "A State-of-the-Art Review on the Drive of Renewables in Gujarat, State of India: Present Situation, Barriers and Future Initiatives," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-30, December.
    6. Rana Basu & Prabha Bhola, 2015. "Exploring Quality Management Practices and Its Pattern Analysis in Indian Service SMEs," Journal of Enterprising Culture (JEC), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 23(02), pages 199-235, June.
    7. Ivan Nygaard & Ulrich Hansen, 2015. "The conceptual and practical challenges to technology categorisation in the preparation of technology needs assessments," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 131(3), pages 371-385, August.
    8. Maqbool, Rashid, 2018. "Efficiency and effectiveness of factors affecting renewable energy projects; an empirical perspective," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 944-956.
    9. Sushil, 2017. "Modified ISM/TISM Process with Simultaneous Transitivity Checks for Reducing Direct Pair Comparisons," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 18(4), pages 331-351, December.
    10. Madhukar Patil & M. Suresh, 2019. "Modelling the Enablers of Workforce Agility in IoT Projects: A TISM Approach," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 20(2), pages 157-175, June.
    11. Angelos Pantouvakis & Evangelos Psomas, 2016. "Exploring total quality management applications under uncertainty: A research agenda for the shipping industry," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 18(4), pages 496-512, December.
    12. Punia Sindhu, Sonal & Nehra, Vijay & Luthra, Sunil, 2016. "Recognition and prioritization of challenges in growth of solar energy using analytical hierarchy process: Indian outlook," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 332-348.
    13. Jaya Priyadarshini & Rajesh Kr Singh & Ruchi Mishra & Surajit Bag, 2022. "Investigating the interaction of factors for implementing additive manufacturing to build an antifragile supply chain: TISM-MICMAC approach," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 567-588, June.
    14. Gaogeng Zhu & Guoming Chen & Jingyu Zhu & Xiangkun Meng & Xinhong Li, 2022. "Modeling the Evolution of Major Storm-Disaster-Induced Accidents in the Offshore Oil and Gas Industry," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-27, June.
    15. Jayaraman, Deepan & Ramu, Palaniappan, 2023. "L-moments and Bayesian inference for probabilistic risk assessment with scarce samples that include extremes," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    16. Chunchang Zhang & Hu Sun & Yuanyuan Zhang & Gen Li & Shibo Li & Junyu Chang & Gongqian Shi, 2023. "Fire Accident Risk Analysis of Lithium Battery Energy Storage Systems during Maritime Transportation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-12, September.
    17. Singh, Rhythm, 2018. "Energy sufficiency aspirations of India and the role of renewable resources: Scenarios for future," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P2), pages 2783-2795.
    18. Kraidi, Layth & Shah, Raj & Matipa, Wilfred & Borthwick, Fiona, 2019. "Analyzing the critical risk factors associated with oil and gas pipeline projects in Iraq," International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 14-22.
    19. Yongbo Li & Bathrinath Sankaranarayanan & D. Thresh Kumar & Ali Diabat, 2019. "Risks assessment in thermal power plants using ISM methodology," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 279(1), pages 89-113, August.
    20. Yin, Yuanbo & Yang, Hao & Duan, Pengfei & Li, Luling & Zio, Enrico & Liu, Cuiwei & Li, Yuxing, 2022. "Improved quantitative risk assessment of a natural gas pipeline considering high-consequence areas," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:3:p:872-:d:136979. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.