IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v10y2018i3p640-d133962.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Improving Operational Risk Management Using Business Performance Management Technologies

Author

Listed:
  • Bram Pieket Weeserik

    (Department of Information and Computing Sciences, Utrecht University, Princetonplein 5, 3584 CC Utrecht, The Netherlands)

  • Marco Spruit

    (Department of Information and Computing Sciences, Utrecht University, Princetonplein 5, 3584 CC Utrecht, The Netherlands)

Abstract

Operational Risk Management (ORM) comprises the continuous management of risks resulting from: human actions, internal processes, systems, and external events. With increasing requirements, complexity and a growing volume of risks, information systems provide benefits for integrating risk management activities and optimizing performance. Business Performance Management (BPM) technologies are believed to provide a solution for effective Operational Risk Management by offering several combined technologies including: work flow, data warehousing, (advanced) analytics, reporting and dashboards. BPM technologies can be integrated with an organization’s Planning & Control cycle and related to strategic objectives. This manuscript aims to show how ORM can benefit from BPM technologies via the development and practical validation of a new maturity model. The B4ORM maturity model was developed following the Design Science Research approach. The maturity model relates specific maturity levels of ORM processes with BPM technologies applicable for a specific maturity stage. There appears to be a strong relationship (0.78) with ORM process maturity and supporting BPM technologies. The B4ORM maturity model as described in this manuscript provides an ideal path of BPM technologies related to six distinctive stages of ORM, leading towards technologies suitable for continuous improvement of ORM processes and organization-wide integration.

Suggested Citation

  • Bram Pieket Weeserik & Marco Spruit, 2018. "Improving Operational Risk Management Using Business Performance Management Technologies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-20, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:3:p:640-:d:133962
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/3/640/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/3/640/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lebas, Michel J., 1995. "Performance measurement and performance management," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 41(1-3), pages 23-35, October.
    2. Carlos Oliveira Cruz & Rui Cunha Marques, 2012. "Risk-Sharing in Seaport Terminal Concessions," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(4), pages 455-471, February.
    3. Lisa K. Meulbroek, 2002. "A Senior Manager'S Guide To Integrated Risk Management," Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, Morgan Stanley, vol. 14(4), pages 56-70, January.
    4. Gordon, Lawrence A. & Loeb, Martin P. & Tseng, Chih-Yang, 2009. "Enterprise risk management and firm performance: A contingency perspective," Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 301-327, July.
    5. Samsonowa, Tatjana, 2011. "Industrial Research Performance Management: Key Performance Indicators in the ICT Industry," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 55717, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    6. Mitra, Sovan & Karathanasopoulos, Andreas & Sermpinis, Georgios & Dunis, Christian & Hood, John, 2015. "Operational risk: Emerging markets, sectors and measurement," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 241(1), pages 122-132.
    7. David L. Olson & Desheng Dash Wu, 2015. "Enterprise Risk Management," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: ENTERPRISE RISK MANAGEMENT, chapter 1, pages 3-12, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    8. Miltiadis D. Lytras & Vijay Raghavan & Ernesto Damiani, 2017. "Big Data and Data Analytics Research: From Metaphors to Value Space for Collective Wisdom in Human Decision Making and Smart Machines," International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems (IJSWIS), IGI Global, vol. 13(1), pages 1-10, January.
    9. Power, Michael, 2009. "The risk management of nothing," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 34(6-7), pages 849-855, August.
    10. Christopher L. Culp, 2002. "The Revolution In Corporate Risk Management: A Decade Of Innovations In Process And Products," Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, Morgan Stanley, vol. 14(4), pages 8-26, January.
    11. Rosenberg, Joshua V. & Schuermann, Til, 2006. "A general approach to integrated risk management with skewed, fat-tailed risks," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 79(3), pages 569-614, March.
    12. Arnold, Vicky & Benford, Tanya & Canada, Joseph & Sutton, Steve G., 2015. "Leveraging integrated information systems to enhance strategic flexibility and performance: The enabling role of enterprise risk management," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 19(C), pages 1-16.
    13. Ashton, Robert H., 1986. "Combining the judgments of experts: How many and which ones?," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 405-414, December.
    14. Kent D Miller, 1992. "A Framework for Integrated Risk Management in International Business," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 23(2), pages 311-331, June.
    15. Desheng Dash Wu & David L. Olson, 2015. "Enterprise Risk Management," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Enterprise Risk Management in Finance, chapter 1, pages 1-10, Palgrave Macmillan.
    16. David L Olson & Desheng Dash Wu, 2015. "Enterprise Risk Management," World Scientific Books, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., number 9378, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anna Visvizi & Miltiadis D. Lytras, 2018. "It’s Not a Fad: Smart Cities and Smart Villages Research in European and Global Contexts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-10, August.
    2. Ge-Qi Cui & Chang-Hyun Jin & Jung-Yong Lee, 2020. "How Risk Managers’ Psychological and Social Capital Promotes the Development of Risk-Management Capabilities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-17, June.
    3. Md. Mominur Rahman, 2023. "The Effect of Business Intelligence on Bank Operational Efficiency and Perceptions of Profitability," FinTech, MDPI, vol. 2(1), pages 1-21, February.
    4. Jau-Yang Liu, 2018. "An Internal Control System that Includes Corporate Social Responsibility for Social Sustainability in the New Era," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-27, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Caraiman Adrian-Cosmin & Mates Dorel, 2020. "Risk management in corporate governance," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 14(1), pages 182-201, July.
    2. CARAIMAN Adrian, 2020. "The Risk Management Process In Corporate Guvernance," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(1), pages 189-198, July.
    3. Sorin Gabriel Anton & Anca Elena Afloarei Nucu, 2020. "Enterprise Risk Management: A Literature Review and Agenda for Future Research," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-22, November.
    4. Levente Bakos & Dănuț Dumitru Dumitrașcu, 2021. "Decentralized Enterprise Risk Management Issues under Rapidly Changing Environments," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-19, September.
    5. Adrian-Cosmin Caraiman, 2020. "The Risk Management in Financing Decisions in Corporate Governance," Ovidius University Annals, Economic Sciences Series, Ovidius University of Constantza, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 0(1), pages 859-865, August.
    6. Caraiman Adrian-Cosmin, 2020. "The Stages Of The Risk Management Process In Corporate Governance," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 3, pages 118-130, June.
    7. Li, Yongjian & Zhen, Xueping & Qi, Xiangtong & Cai, Gangshu (George), 2016. "Penalty and financial assistance in a supply chain with supply disruption," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 167-181.
    8. Kamil J. Mizgier & Joseph M. Pasia & Srinivas Talluri, 2017. "Multiobjective capital allocation for supplier development under risk," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(18), pages 5243-5258, September.
    9. Jonek-Kowalska, Izabela & Nawrocki, Tomasz L., 2019. "Holistic fuzzy evaluation of operational risk in polish mining enterprises in a long-term and sectoral research perspective," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 1-1.
    10. Taleizadeh, Ata Allah & Sadeghi, Razieh, 2019. "Pricing strategies in the competitive reverse supply chains with traditional and e-channels: A game theoretic approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 215(C), pages 48-60.
    11. Alexis Catanzaro & Christine Teyssier, 2021. "Export promotion programs, export capabilities, and risk management practices of internationalized SMEs," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 57(3), pages 1479-1503, October.
    12. Bingsheng Liu & Meiqing Fu & Shuibo Zhang & Bin Xue & Qi Zhou & Shiruo Zhang, 2018. "An interval-valued 2-tuple linguistic group decision-making model based on the Choquet integral operator," International Journal of Systems Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(2), pages 407-424, January.
    13. Sisimonda Kinya Mwanja, 2021. "Effect of operational and market risk exposures on financial performance of DT-Saccos in Kenya," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 10(5), pages 107-118, July.
    14. Ivanov, Dmitry & Pavlov, Alexander & Dolgui, Alexandre & Pavlov, Dmitry & Sokolov, Boris, 2016. "Disruption-driven supply chain (re)-planning and performance impact assessment with consideration of pro-active and recovery policies," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 7-24.
    15. Koen W. de Bock, 2017. "The best of two worlds: Balancing model strength and comprehensibility in business failure prediction using spline-rule ensembles," Post-Print hal-01588059, HAL.
    16. Chih-Yang Tsai, 2017. "The impact of cost structure on supply chain cash flow risk," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(22), pages 6624-6637, November.
    17. Weskamp, Christoph & Koberstein, Achim & Schwartz, Frank & Suhl, Leena & Voß, Stefan, 2019. "A two-stage stochastic programming approach for identifying optimal postponement strategies in supply chains with uncertain demand," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 123-138.
    18. Ovidiu Constantin BUNGET & Anca Ioana BRINDUSE, 2019. "Connection Between Controlling Department and Management – Premise for Achieving Organizational Objectives," The Audit Financiar journal, Chamber of Financial Auditors of Romania, vol. 17(156), pages 680-680.
    19. Jie Zhang & Lu Zhang, 2016. "Impacts on CO 2 Emission Allowance Prices in China: A Quantile Regression Analysis of the Shanghai Emission Trading Scheme," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-12, November.
    20. Nguyen, Duy Tan & Adulyasak, Yossiri & Landry, Sylvain, 2021. "Research manuscript: The Bullwhip Effect in rule-based supply chain planning systems–A case-based simulation at a hard goods retailer," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:3:p:640-:d:133962. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.