IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v10y2018i12p4479-d186187.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Conditions for Transformative Learning for Sustainable Development: A Theoretical Review and Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Magnus Boström

    (School of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences, Örebro University, Örebro SE-701 82, Sweden)

  • Erik Andersson

    (School of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences, Örebro University, Örebro SE-701 82, Sweden)

  • Monika Berg

    (School of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences, Örebro University, Örebro SE-701 82, Sweden)

  • Karin Gustafsson

    (School of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences, Örebro University, Örebro SE-701 82, Sweden)

  • Eva Gustavsson

    (School of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences, Örebro University, Örebro SE-701 82, Sweden)

  • Erik Hysing

    (School of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences, Örebro University, Örebro SE-701 82, Sweden)

  • Rolf Lidskog

    (School of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences, Örebro University, Örebro SE-701 82, Sweden)

  • Erik Löfmarck

    (School of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences, Örebro University, Örebro SE-701 82, Sweden)

  • Maria Ojala

    (School of Law, Psychology, and Social Work, Örebro University; Örebro SE-701 82, Sweden)

  • Jan Olsson

    (School of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences, Örebro University, Örebro SE-701 82, Sweden)

  • Benedict E. Singleton

    (Swedish Biodiversity Centre, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, SE-750 07 Uppsala, Sweden)

  • Sebastian Svenberg

    (School of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences, Örebro University, Örebro SE-701 82, Sweden)

  • Ylva Uggla

    (School of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences, Örebro University, Örebro SE-701 82, Sweden)

  • Johan Öhman

    (School of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences, Örebro University, Örebro SE-701 82, Sweden)

Abstract

Continued unsustainability and surpassed planetary boundaries require not only scientific and technological advances, but deep and enduring social and cultural changes. The purpose of this article is to contribute a theoretical approach to understand conditions and constraints for societal change towards sustainable development. In order to break with unsustainable norms, habits, practices, and structures, there is a need for learning for transformation, not only adaption. Based on a critical literature review within the field of learning for sustainable development, our approach is a development of the concept of transformative learning, by integrating three additional dimensions—Institutional Structures, Social Practices, and Conflict Perspectives. This approach acknowledges conflicts on macro, meso, and micro levels, as well as structural and cultural constraints. It contends that transformative learning is processual, interactional, long-term, and cumbersome. It takes place within existing institutions and social practices, while also transcending them. The article adopts an interdisciplinary social science perspective that acknowledges the importance of transformative learning in order for communities, organizations, and individuals to be able to deal with global sustainability problems, acknowledging the societal and personal conflicts involved in such transformation.

Suggested Citation

  • Magnus Boström & Erik Andersson & Monika Berg & Karin Gustafsson & Eva Gustavsson & Erik Hysing & Rolf Lidskog & Erik Löfmarck & Maria Ojala & Jan Olsson & Benedict E. Singleton & Sebastian Svenberg &, 2018. "Conditions for Transformative Learning for Sustainable Development: A Theoretical Review and Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-21, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:12:p:4479-:d:186187
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/12/4479/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/12/4479/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mog, Justin M., 2004. "Struggling with Sustainability--A Comparative Framework for Evaluating Sustainable Development Programs," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 32(12), pages 2139-2160, December.
    2. Minelle E. Silva & Marina D. Figueiredo, 2017. "Sustainability as Practice: Reflections on the Creation of an Institutional Logic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-13, October.
    3. Niko Schäpke & Ines Omann & Julia M. Wittmayer & Frank Van Steenbergen & Mirijam Mock, 2017. "Linking Transitions to Sustainability: A Study of the Societal Effects of Transition Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-36, May.
    4. Lidskog, Rolf & Bishop, Kevin & Eklöf, Karin & Ring, Eva & Åkerblom, Staffan & Sandström, Camilla, 2018. "From wicked problem to governable entity? The effects of forestry on mercury in aquatic ecosystems," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 90-96.
    5. Pierson, Paul, 2000. "Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 94(2), pages 251-267, June.
    6. Anke Brons & Peter Oosterveer, 2017. "Making Sense of Sustainability: A Practice Theories Approach to Buying Food," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-15, March.
    7. Sietske Smulders-Dane & Toine Smits & Glen Fielding & Yvonne Chang & Kirsten Kuipers, 2016. "Learning from Regional Sustainable Development in The Netherlands: Explorations from a Learning History," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-17, May.
    8. Arthur T. Denzau & Douglass C. North, 1994. "Shared Mental Models: Ideologies and Institutions," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(1), pages 3-31, February.
    9. Paul J. Crutzen, 2002. "Geology of mankind," Nature, Nature, vol. 415(6867), pages 23-23, January.
    10. David Benson & Andrew Jordan, 2012. "Policy Transfer Research: Still Evolving, Not Yet Through?," Political Studies Review, Political Studies Association, vol. 10(3), pages 333-338, September.
    11. Löfmarck, Erik & Lidskog, Rolf, 2017. "Bumping against the boundary: IPBES and the knowledge divide," Environmental Science & Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 22-28.
    12. Elizabeth Shove, 2010. "Beyond the ABC: Climate Change Policy and Theories of Social Change," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 42(6), pages 1273-1285, June.
    13. Maria Ojala, 2013. "Coping with Climate Change among Adolescents: Implications for Subjective Well-Being and Environmental Engagement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 5(5), pages 1-19, May.
    14. Steven A. Moore & Barbara B. Wilson, 2009. "Contested Construction of Green Building Codes in North America: The Case of the Alley Flat Initiative," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 46(12), pages 2617-2641, November.
    15. Geels, Frank W. & Schot, Johan, 2007. "Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 399-417, April.
    16. Peter North, 2011. "The Politics of Climate Activism in the UK: A Social Movement Analysis," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 43(7), pages 1581-1598, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. André Sorensen & Anna-Katharina Brenner, 2021. "Cities, Urban Property Systems, and Sustainability Transitions: Contested Processes of Institutional Change and the Regulation of Urban Property Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-19, July.
    2. Sampsa Hyysalo & Jani Lukkarinen & Paula Kivimaa & Raimo Lovio & Armi Temmes & Mikael Hildén & Tatu Marttila & Karoliina Auvinen & Sofi Perikangas & Allu Pyhälammi & Janne Peljo & Kaisa Savolainen & L, 2019. "Developing Policy Pathways: Redesigning Transition Arenas for Mid-range Planning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-22, January.
    3. Frank W. Geels, 2013. "The Impact of the Financial and Economic Crisis on Sustainability Transitions: Financial Investment, Governance and Public Discourse. WWWforEurope Working Paper No. 39," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 47014, March.
    4. Foxon, Timothy J. & Pearson, Peter J.G. & Arapostathis, Stathis & Carlsson-Hyslop, Anna & Thornton, Judith, 2013. "Branching points for transition pathways: assessing responses of actors to challenges on pathways to a low carbon future," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 146-158.
    5. Seyfang, Gill & Gilbert-Squires, Amber, 2019. "Move your money? Sustainability Transitions in Regimes and Practices in the UK Retail Banking Sector," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 224-235.
    6. Edmondson, Duncan L. & Kern, Florian & Rogge, Karoline S., 2019. "The co-evolution of policy mixes and socio-technical systems: Towards a conceptual framework of policy mix feedback in sustainability transitions," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(10).
    7. Bettini, Yvette & Brown, Rebekah R. & de Haan, Fjalar J. & Farrelly, Megan, 2015. "Understanding institutional capacity for urban water transitions," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 65-79.
    8. Patricia Romero-Lankao & Daniel M. Gnatz & Olga Wilhelmi & Mary Hayden, 2016. "Urban Sustainability and Resilience: From Theory to Practice," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-19, November.
    9. Kirchner, Stefan, 2010. "Organizational identities and institutions: Dynamics of the organizational core as a question of path dependence," MPIfG Working Paper 10/4, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    10. Björn Toelstede, 2019. "How path-creating mechanisms and structural lock-ins make societies drift from democracy to authoritarianism," Rationality and Society, , vol. 31(2), pages 233-262, May.
    11. Roberts, Cameron & Geels, Frank W., 2019. "Conditions for politically accelerated transitions: Historical institutionalism, the multi-level perspective, and two historical case studies in transport and agriculture," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 221-240.
    12. Ron Martin & Peter Sunley, 2010. "The Place of Path Dependence in an Evolutionary Perspective on the Economic Landscape," Chapters, in: Ron Boschma & Ron Martin (ed.), The Handbook of Evolutionary Economic Geography, chapter 3, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    13. Ford, Rebecca & Walton, Sara & Stephenson, Janet & Rees, David & Scott, Michelle & King, Geoff & Williams, John & Wooliscroft, Ben, 2017. "Emerging energy transitions: PV uptake beyond subsidies," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 138-150.
    14. Hess, S. & Kleinschmit, D. & Theuvsen, L. & von Cramon-Taubadel, S. & Zschache, U., 2009. "A Discourse Analysis Approach to Explain the Path Dependency of Seasonal Farm Labour Regulations in Germany," Proceedings “Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V.”, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA), vol. 44, March.
    15. Boettke, Peter J. & Coyne, Christopher J. & Leeson, Peter T., 2013. "Comparative historical political economy," Journal of Institutional Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 9(3), pages 285-301, September.
    16. Chrysostomos Mantzavinos & Douglas C. North & Syed Shariq, 2003. "Learning, Institutions, and Economic Performance," Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods 2003_13, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods.
    17. Esra Çeviker Gürakar & Emin Köksal, 2016. "Institutional evolution and economic development in Iran and Turkey," Middle East Development Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(1), pages 32-64, January.
    18. Claire Dunlop, 2010. "The temporal dimension of knowledge and the limits of policy appraisal: biofuels policy in the UK," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 43(4), pages 343-363, December.
    19. Aligica, Paul Dragos, 2013. "Institutional Diversity and Political Economy: The Ostroms and Beyond," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199843909.
    20. Indra Morandín-Ahuerma & Armando Contreras-Hernández & Dante Ariel Ayala-Ortiz & Octavio Pérez-Maqueo, 2019. "Socio–Ecosystemic Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-26, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:12:p:4479-:d:186187. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.