IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jstats/v8y2025i1p15-d1585418.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Note on Pre-Taxation Data Reported by UK FTSE-Listed Companies: Search for Compatibility with Benford’s Laws

Author

Listed:
  • Marcel Ausloos

    (School of Business, University of Leicester, Brookfield, Leicester LE2 1RQ, UK
    Universitatea Babeş-Bolyai, Str. Mihail Kogălniceanu 1, 400084 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
    Department of Statistics and Econometrics, Bucharest University of Economic Studies, 15-17 Dorobanti Avenue, District 1, 010552 Bucharest, Romania
    Group of Researchers Applying Physics in Economy and Sociology (GRAPES), Beauvallon, Angleur, B-4031 Liège, Belgium)

  • Probowo Erawan Sastroredjo

    (School of Business, University of Leicester, Brookfield, Leicester LE2 1RQ, UK
    Department of Management, Parahyangan Catholic University, Bandung 40141, Indonesia)

  • Polina Khrennikova

    (School of Business, University of Leicester, Brookfield, Leicester LE2 1RQ, UK
    Financial Engineering Group, Faculty of Behavioural, Management, and Social Sciences (BMS), University of Twente, 7522 NB Enschede, The Netherlands)

Abstract

Pre-taxation analysis plays a crucial role in ensuring the fairness of public revenue collection. It can also serve as a tool to reduce the risk of tax avoidance, one of the UK government’s concerns. Our report utilises pre-tax income ( P I ) and total assets ( T A ) data from 567 companies listed on the FTSE All-Share index, gathered from the Refinitiv EIKON database, covering 14 years, i.e., the period from 2009 to 2022. We also derive the P I / T A ratio, and distinguish between positive and negative P I cases. We test the conformity of such data to Benford’s Laws, specifically studying the first significant digit ( F d ), the second significant digit ( S d ), and the first and second significant digits ( F S d ). We use and justify two pertinent tests, the χ 2 and the Mean Absolute Deviation (MAD). We find that both tests do not lead to conclusions in complete agreement with each other—in particular, the MAD test entirely rejects the Benford’s Laws conformity of the reported financial data. From the mere accounting point of view, we conclude that the findings not only cast some doubt on the reported financial data, but also suggest that many more investigations should be considered on closely related matters. On the other hand, the study of a ratio, like P I / T A , of variables that are (or are not) Benford’s Laws-compliant adds to the literature concerning whether such indirect variables should (or should not) be Benford’s Laws-compliant.

Suggested Citation

  • Marcel Ausloos & Probowo Erawan Sastroredjo & Polina Khrennikova, 2025. "Note on Pre-Taxation Data Reported by UK FTSE-Listed Companies: Search for Compatibility with Benford’s Laws," Stats, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-17, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jstats:v:8:y:2025:i:1:p:15-:d:1585418
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2571-905X/8/1/15/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2571-905X/8/1/15/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rabeea Sadaf, 2017. "Advanced Statistical Techniques For Testing Benford'S Law," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(2), pages 229-238, December.
    2. Roy Cerqueti & Claudio Lupi, 2021. "Some New Tests of Conformity with Benford’s Law," Stats, MDPI, vol. 4(3), pages 1-17, September.
    3. Roy Cerqueti & Claudio Lupi, 2023. "Severe testing of Benford’s law," Post-Print hal-04321928, HAL.
    4. Vladan Pavlović & Goranka Knežević & Marijana Joksimović & Dušan Joksimović, 2019. "Fraud Detection in Financial Statements Applying Benford’s Law with Monte Carlo Simulation," Acta Oeconomica, Akadémiai Kiadó, Hungary, vol. 69(2), pages 217-239, June.
    5. Druică, Elena & Oancea, Bogdan & Vâlsan, Călin, 2018. "Benford's law and the limits of digit analysis," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 75-82.
    6. Tom Van Caneghem, 2004. "The impact of audit quality on earnings rounding-up behaviour: some UK evidence," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(4), pages 771-786.
    7. Fewster, R. M., 2009. "A Simple Explanation of Benford's Law," The American Statistician, American Statistical Association, vol. 63(1), pages 26-32.
    8. Herteliu, Claudiu & Jianu, Ionel & Dragan, Irina Maria & Apostu, Simona & Luchian, Iuliana, 2021. "Testing Benford’s Laws (non)conformity within disclosed companies’ financial statements among hospitality industry in Romania," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 582(C).
    9. Roy Cerqueti & Claudio Lupi, 2023. "Severe testing of Benford’s law," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 32(2), pages 677-694, June.
    10. Cerqueti, Roy & Maggi, Mario, 2021. "Data validity and statistical conformity with Benford’s Law," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    11. Arezzo, Maria Felice & Cerqueti, Roy, 2023. "A Benford’s Law view of inspections’ reasonability," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 632(P1).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Arezzo, Maria Felice & Cerqueti, Roy, 2023. "A Benford’s Law view of inspections’ reasonability," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 632(P1).
    2. Roy Cerqueti & Claudio Lupi, 2023. "Severe testing of Benford’s law," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 32(2), pages 677-694, June.
    3. Philip E Hulme & Danish A Ahmed & Phillip J Haubrock & Brooks A Kaiser & Melina Kourantidou & Boris Leroy & Shana M Mcdermott, 2024. "Widespread imprecision in estimates of the economic costs of invasive alien species worldwide," Post-Print hal-04633043, HAL.
    4. Roeland de Kok & Giulia Rotundo, 2022. "Benford Networks," Stats, MDPI, vol. 5(4), pages 1-14, September.
    5. Di Marzio, Marco & Fensore, Stefania & Passamonti, Chiara, 2024. "Validating Benfordness on contaminated data," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    6. Călin Vâlsan & Andreea-Ionela Puiu & Elena Druică, 2024. "From Whence Commeth Data Misreporting? A Survey of Benford’s Law and Digit Analysis in the Time of the COVID-19 Pandemic," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-20, August.
    7. Adriano Silva & Sergio Floquet & Ricardo Lima, 2023. "Newcomb–Benford’s Law in Neuromuscular Transmission: Validation in Hyperkalemic Conditions," Stats, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-19, October.
    8. Roy Cerqueti & Mario Maggi & Jessica Riccioni, 2024. "Statistical methods for decision support systems in finance: how Benford’s law predicts financial risk," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 342(3), pages 1445-1469, November.
    9. Lasse Pröger & Paul Griesberger & Klaus Hackländer & Norbert Brunner & Manfred Kühleitner, 2021. "Benford’s Law for Telemetry Data of Wildlife," Stats, MDPI, vol. 4(4), pages 1-7, November.
    10. Tošić, Aleksandar & Vičič, Jernej, 2021. "Use of Benford's law on academic publishing networks," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 15(3).
    11. Wolfgang Kössler & Hans-J. Lenz & Xing D. Wang, 2024. "Some new invariant sum tests and MAD tests for the assessment of Benford’s law," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 39(7), pages 3779-3800, December.
    12. Louie Rivers & Tamara Dempsey & Jade Mitchell & Carole Gibbs, 2015. "Environmental Regulation and Enforcement: Structures, Processes and the Use of Data for Fraud Detection," Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management (JEAPM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 17(04), pages 1-29, December.
    13. Sitsofe Tsagbey & Miguel de Carvalho & Garritt L. Page, 2017. "All Data are Wrong, but Some are Useful? Advocating the Need for Data Auditing," The American Statistician, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 71(3), pages 231-235, July.
    14. Pei, Duo & Vasarhelyi, Miklos A., 2020. "Big data and algorithmic trading against periodic and tangible asset reporting: The need for U-XBRL," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 37(C).
    15. Kauko, Karlo, 2019. "Benford's law and Chinese banks' non-performing loans," BOFIT Discussion Papers 25/2019, Bank of Finland Institute for Emerging Economies (BOFIT).
    16. Matthew A. Cole & David J. Maddison & Liyun Zhang, 2020. "Testing the emission reduction claims of CDM projects using the Benford’s Law," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 160(3), pages 407-426, June.
    17. Bonache, Adrien & Moris, Karen, 2009. "Nonlinear and chaotic patterns in Japanese video game console sales and consequences for management control," MPRA Paper 18196, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. Baumgartner, Tim & Güttler, André, 2022. "Bitcoin flash crash on May 19, 2021: What did really happen on Binance?," IWH Discussion Papers 25/2022, Halle Institute for Economic Research (IWH).
    19. Holz, Carsten A., 2014. "The quality of China's GDP statistics," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 309-338.
    20. Karlo Kauko, 2024. "How to detect what drives deviations from Benford’s law? An application to bank deposit data," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 67(3), pages 1045-1061, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jstats:v:8:y:2025:i:1:p:15-:d:1585418. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.