IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsoctx/v5y2015i2p492-514d50184.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cyberbullying and Primary-School Aged Children: The Psychological Literature and the Challenge for Sociology

Author

Listed:
  • Lesley-Anne Ey

    (School of Education, University of South Australia, St Bernard's Road, Magill SA 5072, Australia)

  • Carmel Taddeo

    (School of Education, University of South Australia, St Bernard's Road, Magill SA 5072, Australia)

  • Barbara Spears

    (School of Education, University of South Australia, St Bernard's Road, Magill SA 5072, Australia)

Abstract

Cyberbullying is an international issue for schools, young people and their families. Whilst many research domains have explored this phenomenon, and bullying more generally, the majority of reported studies appear in the psychological and educational literatures, where bullying, and more recently, cyberbullying has been examined primarily at the individual level: amongst adolescents and young people, with a focus on the definition, its prevalence, behaviours, and impact. There also is growing evidence that younger children are increasingly accessing technology and engaging with social media, yet there is limited research dedicated to this younger age group. The purpose of this paper is to report on a systematic literature review from the psychological and educational research domains related to this younger age group, to inform future research across the disciplines. Younger children require different methods of engagement. This review highlights the methodological challenges associated with this age group present in the psychological literature, and argues for a greater use of sociological, child-centred approaches to data collection. This review examined studies published in English, between 2009 and 2014, and conducted with children aged 5–12 years, about their experiences with cyberbullying. Searches were conducted on seven key databases using keywords associated with cyberbullying and age of children. A Google Scholar search also examined published and unpublished reports. A total of 966 articles and reports were retrieved. A random peer review process was employed to establish inter-rater reliability and veracity of the review. Findings revealed 38 studies reported specifically on children aged 5–12 years. The dominant focus of these articles was on prevalence of cyberbullying, established through survey methodology. Few studies noted impacts, understanding and behaviours or engaged children’s independent voice. This review highlights current gaps in our knowledge about younger children’s experiences with this form of bullying, and the importance of employing cross-disciplinary and developmentally appropriate methodologies to inform future research.

Suggested Citation

  • Lesley-Anne Ey & Carmel Taddeo & Barbara Spears, 2015. "Cyberbullying and Primary-School Aged Children: The Psychological Literature and the Challenge for Sociology," Societies, MDPI, vol. 5(2), pages 1-23, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:5:y:2015:i:2:p:492-514:d:50184
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/5/2/492/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/5/2/492/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sonia Livingstone & Peter K. Smith, 2014. "Annual research review: harms experienced by child users of online and mobile technologies: the nature, prevalence and management of sexual and aggressive risks in the digital age," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 55691, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Boban Melović & Anđela Jakšić Stojanović & Tamara Backović & Branislav Dudić & Zuzana Kovačičová, 2020. "Research of Attitudes toward Online Violence—Significance of Online Media and Social Marketing in the Function of Violence Prevention and Behavior Evaluation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-25, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ethel Quayle, 2016. "Researching online child sexual exploitation and abuse: are there links between online and offline vulnerabilities?," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 71260, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    2. Jose M. Martín-Criado & Jose A. Casas & Rosario Ortega-Ruiz, 2021. "Parental Supervision: Predictive Variables of Positive Involvement in Cyberbullying Prevention," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-12, February.
    3. Teo Keipi & Atte Oksanen & James Hawdon & Matti Näsi & Pekka Räsänen, 2017. "Harm-advocating online content and subjective well-being: a cross-national study of new risks faced by youth," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(5), pages 634-649, May.
    4. Michelle F. Wright & Ikuko Aoyama & Shanmukh V. Kamble & Zheng Li & Shruti Soudi & Li Lei & Chang Shu, 2015. "Peer Attachment and Cyber Aggression Involvement among Chinese, Indian, and Japanese Adolescents," Societies, MDPI, vol. 5(2), pages 1-15, April.
    5. Sonia Livingstone & Jessica Mason, 2015. "Sexual rights and sexual risks among youth online: a review of existing knowledge regarding childrenand young people’s developing sexuality in relationto new media environments," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 64567, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    6. Karissa Leduc & Megha Pooja Nagar & Oksana Caivano & Victoria Talwar, 2024. "When Is It Helpful to Get Involved? Adolescents’ Perceptions of Constructive and Aggressive Bystander Support from Friends, Acquaintances, and Public Figures in Cyberbullying," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(9), pages 1-11, August.
    7. Luísa Campos & Lurdes Veríssimo & Bárbara Nobre & Catarina Morais & Pedro Dias, 2021. "Protective Factors in the Use of Electronic Media According to Youth and Their Parents: An Exploratory Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-12, March.
    8. Shuang Wang & Jin Huang & Hongbin Xie & Cong Liu & Xiaolong Wang, 2024. "Maternal depression and children’s behavioral self-regulation: the role of parenting and children’s screen time," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-10, December.
    9. Kai Dou & Lin-Xin Wang & Jian-Bin Li & Guo-Dong Wang & Yan-Yu Li & Yi-Ting Huang, 2020. "Mobile Phone Addiction and Risk-Taking Behavior among Chinese Adolescents: A Moderated Mediation Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-13, July.
    10. Ruthaychonnee Sittichai & Peter K. Smith, 2020. "Information Technology Use and Cyberbullying Behavior in South Thailand: A Test of the Goldilocks Hypothesis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-15, September.
    11. Inmaculada Méndez & Ana Belén Jorquera & Cecilia Ruiz Esteban & José Manuel García-Fernández, 2020. "Profiles of Mobile Phone Use, Cyberbullying, and Emotional Intelligence in Adolescents," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-10, November.
    12. Tiziana Mancini & Federica Sibilla & Dimitris Argiropoulos & Michele Rossi & Marina Everri, 2019. "The opportunities and risks of mobile phones for refugees’ experience: A scoping review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(12), pages 1-24, December.
    13. Guo, Jiacheng & Liu, Yuxiao & Yang, Xiujuan & Cao, Min & Niu, Gengfeng & Zhou, Zongkui, 2024. "The relationship between social network site use and depression among Children: A moderated mediation model," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    14. Taylor, Erin K. & Slemaker, Alexandra & Silovsky, Jane F., 2020. "Professionals’ perceptions of electronic and online sexual behaviors of youth in their community," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:5:y:2015:i:2:p:492-514:d:50184. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.