IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsoctx/v14y2024i3p42-d1359918.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Innovation 4.0 Policies in Italy: Strengths and Weaknesses of the Innovation Ecosystem of the “Transition 4.0” Plan from an International Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Francesco Orazi

    (Department of Social Sciences, Polytechnic University of Marche, 60121 Ancona, Italy)

  • Federico Sofritti

    (Department of Economics and Law, Faculty of Economics, University of Macerata, 62100 Macerata, Italy)

Abstract

Innovation 4.0 is a strategic lever of industrial policies. That is the reason why, over the last decade, many European countries have introduced national plans to implement it in their economic fabric. Within this context, this paper focuses on the effects of Industry 4.0 policies in Italy and Europe by presenting the results of a research study on the national and continental ecosystems of innovation. In particular, the study was conducted by involving the main key bodies introduced by the “Transition 4.0” plan in Italy: Competence Centers (CCs), Digital Innovation Hubs (DIHs), and Punti Impresa Digitale (PID). The study adopted a qualitative–quantitative approach: an analysis of gray literature, semi-structured interviews, and a survey involving Italian and European DIHs were carried out. The results highlight an ambivalent scenario: on the one hand, the research suggests that the consolidation of the ecosystems of innovation is underway in Italy and relies on good organizational capacity; on the other hand, the international comparison indicates that the Italian system still suffers from a marked territorial and institutional fragmentation that needs to be addressed in the coming years.

Suggested Citation

  • Francesco Orazi & Federico Sofritti, 2024. "Innovation 4.0 Policies in Italy: Strengths and Weaknesses of the Innovation Ecosystem of the “Transition 4.0” Plan from an International Perspective," Societies, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-18, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:14:y:2024:i:3:p:42-:d:1359918
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/14/3/42/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/14/3/42/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Müller, Julian Marius & Buliga, Oana & Voigt, Kai-Ingo, 2018. "Fortune favors the prepared: How SMEs approach business model innovations in Industry 4.0," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 2-17.
    2. Jose-Luis Hervás-Oliver & Jose Albors-Garrigos & Sofia Estelles-Miguel & Carles Boronat-Moll, 2018. "Radical innovation in Marshallian industrial districts," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(10), pages 1388-1397, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ghadimi, Pezhman & Donnelly, Oisin & Sar, Kubra & Wang, Chao & Azadnia, Amir Hossein, 2022. "The successful implementation of industry 4.0 in manufacturing: An analysis and prioritization of risks in Irish industry," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    2. Dirk Fornahl & Nils Grashof & Alexander Kopka, 2021. "Do not neglect the periphery?! - the emergence and diffusion of radical innovations," Bremen Papers on Economics & Innovation 2102, University of Bremen, Faculty of Business Studies and Economics.
    3. Ancillai, Chiara & Sabatini, Andrea & Gatti, Marco & Perna, Andrea, 2023. "Digital technology and business model innovation: A systematic literature review and future research agenda," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    4. Guilian Wang & Liyan Zhang & Jing Guo, 2022. "Driving Factors and Mechanisms of AMT Application Levels for Equipment Manufacturing Enterprises: Based on Programmatic Grounded Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-18, July.
    5. Jol Stoffers & Beatrice van der Heijden & Ilse Schrijver, 2019. "Towards a Sustainable Model of Innovative Work Behaviors’ Enhancement: The Mediating Role of Employability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-25, December.
    6. Bartoloni, Sara & Calò, Ernesto & Marinelli, Luca & Pascucci, Federica & Dezi, Luca & Carayannis, Elias & Revel, Gian Marco & Gregori, Gian Luca, 2022. "Towards designing society 5.0 solutions: The new Quintuple Helix - Design Thinking approach to technology," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    7. Yüksel, Hilmi, 2020. "An empirical evaluation of industry 4.0 applications of companies in Turkey: The case of a developing country," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    8. Theerasak Nitlarp & Supaporn Kiattisin, 2022. "The Impact Factors of Industry 4.0 on ESG in the Energy Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-19, July.
    9. Tsai, Pei-Hsuan, 2020. "Strategic evaluation criteria to assess competitiveness of the service industry in Taiwan," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 42(6), pages 1287-1309.
    10. Tao, Zhibin & Chao, Jiaxiao, 2024. "Unlocking new opportunities in the industry 4.0 era, exploring the critical impact of digital technology on sustainable performance and the mediating role of GSCM practices," Innovation and Green Development, Elsevier, vol. 3(3).
    11. Alessandra De Chiara, 2020. "Sustainable Business Model Innovation vs. “Made in” for International Performance of Italian Food Companies," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-17, December.
    12. Asterios Stroumpoulis & Evangelia Kopanaki & George Karaganis, 2021. "Examining the Relationship between Information Systems, Sustainable SCM, and Competitive Advantage," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-21, October.
    13. Davide Berardi & Franco Callegati & Andrea Giovine & Andrea Melis & Marco Prandini & Lorenzo Rinieri, 2023. "When Operation Technology Meets Information Technology: Challenges and Opportunities," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-16, February.
    14. Silvia H. Bonilla & Helton R. O. Silva & Marcia Terra da Silva & Rodrigo Franco Gonçalves & José B. Sacomano, 2018. "Industry 4.0 and Sustainability Implications: A Scenario-Based Analysis of the Impacts and Challenges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-24, October.
    15. Chiarello, Filippo & Fantoni, Gualtiero & Hogarth, Terence & Giordano, Vito & Baltina, Liga & Spada, Irene, 2021. "Towards ESCO 4.0 – Is the European classification of skills in line with Industry 4.0? A text mining approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    16. Ron Boschma & Ernest Miguelez & Rosina Moreno & Diego B. Ocampo-Corrales, 2021. "Technological breakthroughs in European regions: the role of related and unrelated combinations," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 2118, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Jun 2021.
    17. Rafael, Lizarralde Dorronsoro & Jaione, Ganzarain Epelde & Cristina, López & Ibon, Serrano Lasa, 2020. "An Industry 4.0 maturity model for machine tool companies," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    18. Popkova, Elena G. & Bogoviz, Aleksei V. & Lobova, Svetlana V. & DeLo, Piper & Alekseev, Alexander N. & Sergi, Bruno S., 2023. "Environmentally sustainable policies in the petroleum sector through the lens of industry 4.0. Russians Lukoil and Gazprom: The COVID-19 crisis of 2020 vs sanctions crisis of 2022," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    19. Anna Maria Ferrari & Lucrezia Volpi & Martina Pini & Cristina Siligardi & Fernando Enrique García-Muiña & Davide Settembre-Blundo, 2019. "Building a Sustainability Benchmarking Framework of Ceramic Tiles Based on Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment (LCSA)," Resources, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-30, January.
    20. Niklas Johansson & Eva Roth & Wiebke Reim, 2019. "Smart and Sustainable eMaintenance: Capabilities for Digitalization of Maintenance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-19, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:14:y:2024:i:3:p:42-:d:1359918. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.