IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i1p114-d1562809.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

‘Buzz-and-Pipeline’ Dynamics in AI Innovation Network: A Case Study of Zhangjiang National Innovation Demonstration Zone, Shanghai

Author

Listed:
  • Yuanyuan Wan

    (The Center for Modern Chinese City Studies, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China
    The Institute of Urban Development, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China
    School of Geographic Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, China)

  • Gang Zeng

    (The Center for Modern Chinese City Studies, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China
    The Institute of Urban Development, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China
    School of Geographic Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, China)

  • Jiawei Wang

    (The Center for Modern Chinese City Studies, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China
    The Institute of Urban Development, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China
    School of Geographic Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, China)

  • Lin Zou

    (Institute of Management, Shanghai University of Engineering Science, Shanghai 201620, China)

Abstract

The success of a cluster depends on the interplay between intra- and inter-regional collaboration, while empirical research on the mechanisms through which intra- and inter-regional collaborations trigger cluster growth is rarely focused. Based on the local buzz–global pipelines framework and incorporating an evolutionary perspective, we explore how intra- and inter-regional innovation networks can be integrated to drive the growth of emerging industries. We draw on Zhangjiang, China’s most advanced AI industry cluster, using social network analysis and qualitative methods, combining patent data with semi-structured interviews. The results indicate that with the return of multinational corporations and the limitation of Western technology, universities have become the primary source of AI innovation in Zhangjiang. The government has played a pivotal role in propelling the accelerated growth of China’s AI industry, particularly through the backing of pioneering AI private enterprises and the calibration of the potential inefficiencies associated with a state-led model with the dynamism of market forces. The ‘Buzz-and-pipeline’ dynamics in the AI innovation network are shaped by four processes: local networking, market demand, resource integration, and policy synergy. This underscores the intricate interconnections between the national and local scales in AI innovation networks.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuanyuan Wan & Gang Zeng & Jiawei Wang & Lin Zou, 2025. "‘Buzz-and-Pipeline’ Dynamics in AI Innovation Network: A Case Study of Zhangjiang National Innovation Demonstration Zone, Shanghai," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-18, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:1:p:114-:d:1562809
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/1/114/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/1/114/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dirk Fornahl & Robert Hassink & Max-Peter Menzel, 2015. "Broadening Our Knowledge on Cluster Evolution," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(10), pages 1921-1931, October.
    2. Yehua Dennis Wei & Chi Kin Leung, 2005. "Development Zones, Foreign Investment, and Global City Formation in Shanghai," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(1), pages 16-40, February.
    3. Henry Wai-chung Yeung, 2024. "From regional to global and back again? A future agenda for regional evolution and (de)globalised production networks in regional studies," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(7), pages 1480-1491, July.
    4. Michaela Trippl & Franz Tödtling & Lukas Lengauer, 2009. "Knowledge Sourcing Beyond Buzz and Pipelines: Evidence from the Vienna Software Sector," Economic Geography, Clark University, vol. 85(4), pages 443-462, October.
    5. Nadiia Matsiuk & David Doloreux & Richard Shearmur, 2024. "Beyond “buzz”: knowledge interactions, innovation, and neighborhood characteristics," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 24(6), pages 821-842.
    6. Anne Ter Wal & Ron Boschma, 2011. "Co-evolution of Firms, Industries and Networks in Space," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(7), pages 919-933.
    7. Christian Richter Østergaard & Eunkyung Park, 2015. "What Makes Clusters Decline? A Study on Disruption and Evolution of a High-Tech Cluster in Denmark," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(5), pages 834-849, May.
    8. Dieter F. Kogler & Adam Whittle & Keungoui Kim & Balázs Lengyel, 2023. "Understanding Regional Branching: Knowledge Diversification via Inventor and Firm Collaboration Networks," Economic Geography, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 99(5), pages 471-498, October.
    9. Snehal Awate & Ram Mudambi, 2018. "On the geography of emerging industry technological networks: the breadth and depth of patented innovations," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 18(2), pages 391-419.
    10. Zhang, Kevin Honglin, 2014. "How does foreign direct investment affect industrial competitiveness? Evidence from China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 530-539.
    11. Ulrich Hilpert, 2021. "Regional selectivity of innovative progress: Industry 4.0 and digitization ahead," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(9), pages 1589-1605, September.
    12. Elisa Giuliani, 2007. "The selective nature of knowledge networks in clusters: evidence from the wine industry," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 7(2), pages 139-168, March.
    13. Jose-Luis Hervás-Oliver & Jose Albors-Garrigos & Sofia Estelles-Miguel & Carles Boronat-Moll, 2018. "Radical innovation in Marshallian industrial districts," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(10), pages 1388-1397, October.
    14. John Cantwell & Simona Iammarino, 2000. "Multinational Corporations and the Location of Technological Innovation in the UK Regions," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(4), pages 317-332.
    15. Benoît Desmarchelier & Linjia Zhang, 2018. "Innovation networks and cluster dynamics," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 61(3), pages 553-578, November.
    16. Gernot Grabher & Oliver Ibert & Saskia Flohr, 2008. "The Neglected King: The Customer in the New Knowledge Ecology of Innovation," Economic Geography, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 84(3), pages 253-280, July.
    17. Sebastian Henn & Harald Bathelt, 2018. "Cross-local knowledge fertilization, cluster emergence, and the generation of buzz," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 27(3), pages 449-466.
    18. Bernardo S Buarque & Ronald B Davies & Ryan M Hynes & Dieter F Kogler, 2020. "OK Computer: the creation and integration of AI in Europe," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 13(1), pages 175-192.
    19. Franz Tödtling & Michaela Trippl, 2018. "Regional innovation policies for new path development – beyond neo-liberal and traditional systemic views," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(9), pages 1779-1795, September.
    20. Heiner Depner & Harald Bathelt, 2005. "Exporting the German Model: The Establishment of a New Automobile Industry Cluster in Shanghai," Economic Geography, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 81(1), pages 53-81, January.
    21. Henry Wai-chung Yeung, 2022. "Explaining Geographic Shifts of Chip Making toward East Asia and Market Dynamics in Semiconductor Global Production Networks," Economic Geography, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 98(3), pages 272-298, May.
    22. Jason Owen-Smith & Walter W. Powell, 2004. "Knowledge Networks as Channels and Conduits: The Effects of Spillovers in the Boston Biotechnology Community," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 15(1), pages 5-21, February.
    23. Philip Cooke, 2018. "Generative growth with ‘thin’ globalization: Cambridge’s crossover model of innovation," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(9), pages 1815-1834, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Harald Bathelt & Sebastian Henn, 2014. "The Geographies of Knowledge Transfers over Distance: Toward a Typology," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 46(6), pages 1403-1424, June.
    2. Markus Grillitsch & Magnus Nilsson, 2015. "Innovation in peripheral regions: Do collaborations compensate for a lack of local knowledge spillovers?," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 54(1), pages 299-321, January.
    3. Benoit, Florence & Belderbos, René, 2024. "International connection, local disconnection: The (heterogeneous) role of global cities in local and global innovation networks," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 30(3).
    4. Christian Longhi, 2017. "Cluster Dynamics: Learning from Competitiveness Cluster Policy. The Case of 'Secure Communicating Solutions' in the French Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur Region," GREDEG Working Papers 2017-42, Groupe de REcherche en Droit, Economie, Gestion (GREDEG CNRS), Université Côte d'Azur, France.
    5. Franz Tödtling & Markus Grillitsch, 2015. "Does Combinatorial Knowledge Lead to a Better Innovation Performance of Firms?," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(9), pages 1741-1758, September.
    6. Bastien Bernela & Marie Ferru & Marc-Hubert Depret, 2017. "When genesis shapes cluster life cycle? Applying mixed method on a French cluster case study," Working Papers halshs-01616929, HAL.
    7. Giuliani, Elisa, 2013. "Network dynamics in regional clusters: Evidence from Chile," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(8), pages 1406-1419.
    8. Jili Xu & Fiona Fan Yang & Desheng Xue, 2019. "The Geography of Knowledge Sourcing, Personal Networks, and Innovation Effects: Evidence from the Biomedical Firms in Guangzhou, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-18, June.
    9. Grzegorz Micek, 2019. "Geographical Proximity Paradox Revisited: The Case of IT Service SMEs in Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-18, October.
    10. Marta Gancarczyk & Joanna Bohatkiewicz, 2018. "Research Streams in Cluster Upgrading. A Literature Review," Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, Fundacja Upowszechniająca Wiedzę i Naukę "Cognitione", vol. 4(4), pages 17-42.
    11. Doehne, Malte & Rost, Katja, 2021. "Long waves in the geography of innovation: The rise and decline of regional clusters of creativity over time," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(9).
    12. Laurent R. Bergé & Iris Wanzenböck & Thomas Scherngell, 2017. "Centrality of regions in R&D networks: a new measurement approach using the concept of bridging paths," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(8), pages 1165-1178, August.
    13. Yana Borissenko & Ron Boschma, 2016. "A critical review of entrepreneurial ecosystems: towards a future research agenda," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 1630, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Nov 2016.
    14. Bathelt, Harald & Li, Pengfei, 2020. "Processes of building cross-border knowledge pipelines," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(3).
    15. Hervas Oliver,Jose Luis & Gonzalez,Gregorio & Caja,Pedro, 2014. "Clusters and industrial districts: where is the literature going? Identifying emerging sub-fields of research," INGENIO (CSIC-UPV) Working Paper Series 201409, INGENIO (CSIC-UPV).
    16. Sándor Juhász, 2021. "Spinoffs and tie formation in cluster knowledge networks," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 56(4), pages 1385-1404, April.
    17. Rosina Moreno & Ernest Miguélez, 2012. "A Relational Approach To The Geography Of Innovation: A Typology Of Regions," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(3), pages 492-516, July.
    18. Bressanelli, Gianmarco & Visintin, Filippo & Saccani, Nicola, 2022. "Circular Economy and the evolution of industrial districts: a supply chain perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    19. Nathalie Schieb-Bienfait & Anne-Laure Saives & Brigitte Charles-Pauvers & Sandrine Emin & Hélène Morteau, 2018. "Grouping and/or grounding : a closer look at cultural quarters and creative cluster management in Nantes (France)," Post-Print hal-02502524, HAL.
    20. Chakravarty, Dwarka & Goerzen, Anthony & Musteen, Martina & Ahsan, Mujtaba, 2021. "Global cities: A multi-disciplinary review and research agenda," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 56(3).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:1:p:114-:d:1562809. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.