IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsoctx/v14y2024i12p271-d1546993.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perception and Ethical Challenges for the Future of AI as Encountered by Surveyed New Engineers

Author

Listed:
  • Hisham O. Khogali

    (Interdisciplinary Research Center for Intelligent Manufacturing and Robotics, King Fahd University for Petroleum and Minerals, Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia
    Department of Global Studies, King Fahd University for Petroleum and Minerals, Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia)

  • Samir Mekid

    (Interdisciplinary Research Center for Intelligent Manufacturing and Robotics, King Fahd University for Petroleum and Minerals, Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia
    Mechanical Engineering Department, King Fahd University for Petroleum and Minerals, Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia)

Abstract

Our extensive history of embracing AI technological advances demonstrates that AI may be a useful tool if humans learn to use it intelligently, and that concerns about it replacing human occupations may be unwarranted. Indeed, a range of remarkable new AI approaches are fast transforming diverse human experiences and fundamentally disrupting our lives, but not without some drawbacks. This study reflects on how new engineers view AI’s influence on trust and ethical attitudes. Data-driven perceptions drive educated debates, education initiatives, and legislative decisions aimed at effectively addressing non-scientific AI concerns. This contributes to improving the future of AI-based learning through transdisciplinary research that considers the evidence of ethical challenges raised by AI misapplication. Our analysis of quantitative data from a survey of 715 recently graduated engineers from diverse fields, who often use information technologies, reveals that many believed AI-related difficulties were scientifically uncertain. According to this study’s findings, the observed variance in the trend relating to reduced fear of job losses due to AI (R 2 = 0.1121) suggests that specialties heavily impacted by crucial decision making have a lower level of fear. This provides strong evidence for an optimistic path to AI breakthroughs boosting the level of confidence in and acceptance of AI across many industries.

Suggested Citation

  • Hisham O. Khogali & Samir Mekid, 2024. "Perception and Ethical Challenges for the Future of AI as Encountered by Surveyed New Engineers," Societies, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-25, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:14:y:2024:i:12:p:271-:d:1546993
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/14/12/271/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/14/12/271/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stephanie Kelley, 2022. "Employee Perceptions of the Effective Adoption of AI Principles," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 178(4), pages 871-893, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Olimpia Ban & Irina Maiorescu & Mihaela Bucur & Gabriel Cristian Sabou & Betty Cohen Tzedec, 2024. "AI between Threat and Benefactor for the Competences of the Human Working Force," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 26(67), pages 762-762, August.
    2. Maude Lavanchy & Patrick Reichert & Jayanth Narayanan & Krishna Savani, 2023. "Applicants’ Fairness Perceptions of Algorithm-Driven Hiring Procedures," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 188(1), pages 125-150, November.
    3. Bar-Gil, Oshri & Ron, Tom & Czerniak, Ofir, 2024. "AI for the people? Embedding AI ethics in HR and people analytics projects," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    4. Serge P. da Motta Veiga & Maria Figueroa-Armijos & Brent B. Clark, 2023. "Seeming Ethical Makes You Attractive: Unraveling How Ethical Perceptions of AI in Hiring Impacts Organizational Innovativeness and Attractiveness," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 186(1), pages 199-216, August.
    5. Michael Haenlein & Ming-Hui Huang & Andreas Kaplan, 2022. "Guest Editorial: Business Ethics in the Era of Artificial Intelligence," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 178(4), pages 867-869, July.
    6. Constanta-Nicoleta Bodea & Mario Paparic & Radu Ioan Mogos & Maria-Iuliana Dascalu, 2024. "Artificial Intelligence Adoption in the Workplace and Its Impact on the Upskilling and Reskilling Strategies," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 26(65), pages 126-126, February.
    7. O. C. Ferrell & Dana E. Harrison & Linda K. Ferrell & Haya Ajjan & Bryan W. Hochstein, 2024. "A theoretical framework to guide AI ethical decision making," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 14(1), pages 53-67, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:14:y:2024:i:12:p:271-:d:1546993. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.