IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsoctx/v13y2023i1p15-d1024406.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Materiality, Corporeality, and Relationality in Older Human–Robot Interaction (OHRI)

Author

Listed:
  • Lucie Vidovićová

    (Faculty of Social Studies, Masaryk University, Žerotínovo nám. 617/9, 601 77 Brno, Czech Republic)

  • Tereza Menšíková

    (Faculty of Social Studies, Masaryk University, Žerotínovo nám. 617/9, 601 77 Brno, Czech Republic)

Abstract

This article presents interdisciplinary research on the social and technological aspects of interactions between older adults and the humanoid robot Pepper (SoftBank Robotics). Our case study is based on the regular meetings that are a part of an experimental intervention taking place at the Active Ageing Centre for older adults in Prague, run by the NGO Life 90. Through the methods of participant observation, unstructured interviews, analyses of video recordings from interventions with Pepper, and subsequent reflections on the “user” experience with the robot, we have unpacked the complexity of materiality and corporeality in older human–robot interactions (OHRI) in the context of age and gender. The project brings new applied knowledge, exploring OHRI using concepts relevant to gerotechnologies, informed by studies of materiality and ageing studies.

Suggested Citation

  • Lucie Vidovićová & Tereza Menšíková, 2023. "Materiality, Corporeality, and Relationality in Older Human–Robot Interaction (OHRI)," Societies, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:13:y:2023:i:1:p:15-:d:1024406
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/13/1/15/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/13/1/15/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tetsuya Tanioka & Tomoya Yokotani & Ryuichi Tanioka & Feni Betriana & Kazuyuki Matsumoto & Rozzano Locsin & Yueren Zhao & Kyoko Osaka & Misao Miyagawa & Savina Schoenhofer, 2021. "Development Issues of Healthcare Robots: Compassionate Communication for Older Adults with Dementia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-11, April.
    2. Chiara Piezzo & Kenji Suzuki, 2017. "Feasibility Study of a Socially Assistive Humanoid Robot for Guiding Elderly Individuals during Walking," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-16, July.
    3. Dale Dannefer & Peter Uhlenberg & Anne Foner & Ronald P. Abeles, 2005. "On the Shoulders of a Giant: The Legacy of Matilda White Riley for Gerontology," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 60(6), pages 296-304.
    4. Louis Neven & Alexander Peine, 2017. "From Triple Win to Triple Sin: How a Problematic Future Discourse is Shaping the Way People Age with Technology," Societies, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-11, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tetsuya Tanioka & Rozzano C. Locsin & Feni Betriana & Yoshihiro Kai & Kyoko Osaka & Elizabeth Baua & Savina Schoenhofer, 2021. "Intentional Observational Clinical Research Design: Innovative Design for Complex Clinical Research Using Advanced Technology," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-15, October.
    2. Hsu, Eric L. & Elliott, Anthony & Ishii, Yukari & Sawai, Atsushi & Katagiri, Masataka, 2020. "The development of aged care robots in Japan as a varied process," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    3. Ulrike Bechtold & Natalie Stauder & Martin Fieder, 2021. "Let’s Walk It: Mobility and the Perceived Quality of Life in Older Adults," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-14, November.
    4. Dang, Ngoc Bich & Bertrandias, Laurent, 2023. "Social robots as healing aids: How and why powerlessness influences the intention to adopt social robots," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    5. Jyoti Choudrie & Efpraxia Zamani & Chike Obuekwe, 2022. "Bridging the Digital Divide in Ethnic Minority Older Adults: an Organisational Qualitative Study," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 1355-1375, August.
    6. Dale Dannefer & Jielu Lin & George Gonos, 2021. "Age‐Differentiated vs. Age‐Integrated: Neoliberal Policy and the Future of the Life Course," Journal of Elder Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 1(2), pages 59-82, March.
    7. Vera Gallistl & Rebekka Rohner & Alexander Seifert & Anna Wanka, 2020. "Configuring the Older Non-User: Between Research, Policy and Practice of Digital Exclusion," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(2), pages 233-243.
    8. Sungwook Jung & Sung Hee Ahn & Jiwoong Ha & Sangwoo Bahn, 2022. "A Study on the Effectiveness of IT Application Education for Older Adults by Interaction Method of Humanoid Robots," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-17, September.
    9. Lehoux, P. & Grimard, D., 2018. "When robots care: Public deliberations on how technology and humans may support independent living for older adults," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 330-337.
    10. Björn Fischer & Britt Östlund & Nicole K. Dalmer & Andrea Rosales & Alexander Peine & Eugène Loos & Louis Neven & Barbara Marshall, 2021. "Co-Design as Learning: The Differences of Learning When Involving Older People in Digitalization in Four Countries," Societies, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-16, June.
    11. Hanna Köttl & Ella Cohn-Schwartz & Liat Ayalon & Deborah S Carr, 2021. "Self-Perceptions of Aging and Everyday ICT Engagement: A Test of Reciprocal Associations [Risk profiles for mild cognitive impairment and progression to dementia are gender specific]," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 76(9), pages 1913-1922.
    12. Ulrike Bechtold & Natalie Stauder & Martin Fieder & Harald Wilfing, 2022. "Stuck in the Present: A Human Lack of Ability to Visualise (Different) Needs in the Future May Hamper Timely Implementation of AAL and Supportive Technology," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-14, June.
    13. Theodore Koutroukis & Dimos Chatzinikolaou & Charis Vlados & Victoria Pistikou, 2022. "The Post-COVID-19 Era, Fourth Industrial Revolution, and New Globalization: Restructured Labor Relations and Organizational Adaptation," Societies, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-17, December.
    14. Eija Kärnä & Lotta Aavikko & Rebekka Rohner & Vera Gallistl & Kaisa Pihlainen & Claudia Müller & Anja Ehlers & Roberta Bevilacqua & Stefano Strano & Elvira Maranesi & Katerina Cerna & Lisa Hengl & Fra, 2022. "A Multilevel Model of Older Adults’ Appropriation of ICT and Acquisition of Digital Literacy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-14, November.
    15. James Wright, 2021. "The Alexafication of Adult Social Care: Virtual Assistants and the Changing Role of Local Government in England," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(2), pages 1-12, January.
    16. Carla Greubel & Ellen H. M. Moors & Alexander Peine, 2021. "From Mattering to Mattering More: ‘Goods’ and ‘Bads’ in Ageing and Innovation Policy Discourses," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-20, July.
    17. Alina Betlej, 2022. "Designing Robots for Elderly from the Perspective of Potential End-Users: A Sociological Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-17, March.
    18. Barbara L. Marshall & Nicole K. Dalmer & Stephen Katz & Eugene Loos & Daniel López Gómez & Alexander Peine, 2022. "Digitization of Aging-in-Place: An International Comparison of the Value-Framing of New Technologies," Societies, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-14, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:13:y:2023:i:1:p:15-:d:1024406. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.