IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsoctx/v12y2022i3p76-d808292.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Unsettling the Hegemony of ‘Western’ Thinking: Critical Reflection on My Journey to Understanding Campesino-a-Campesino Pedagogy

Author

Listed:
  • Roseann Kerr

    (Health Sciences, Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, ON P7B 5E1, Canada)

Abstract

In the field of education for sustainability, there is a call to consider diverse livelihoods and world views beyond dominant anthropocentric, scientific, and ‘Western’ ways of understanding and living. For scholars and educators trained in ‘Western’ culture, this is complicated by how this dominant culture is infused in all our ways of thinking and being. This paper explores the authors’ journey to unsettle their ‘Western’ thinking through analysis of reflexive field notes taken during field research. Data is shared from the author’s doctoral study of Campesino-a-Campesino (CaC) as an anti-racist pedagogy. The paper tells a story of the unsettling of the author’s assumptions about research, race, development, and education prompted by field experiences and guided by critical educational ethnography. An interdisciplinary approach to analysis is used including scholars in critical race theory, TribalCrit, Indigenous education, decolonization theory, and post-development theory. Conclusions illuminate researcher reflexivity, understanding critical context, learning the history of research, and shifting which scholars are considered in the analysis as crucial in the process of decolonizing the study of anti-racist pedagogies for sustainability.

Suggested Citation

  • Roseann Kerr, 2022. "Unsettling the Hegemony of ‘Western’ Thinking: Critical Reflection on My Journey to Understanding Campesino-a-Campesino Pedagogy," Societies, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-17, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:12:y:2022:i:3:p:76-:d:808292
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/12/3/76/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/12/3/76/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Aram Ziai, 2017. "Post-development 25 years after," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(12), pages 2547-2558, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jem Bendell, 2022. "Replacing Sustainable Development: Potential Frameworks for International Cooperation in an Era of Increasing Crises and Disasters," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-19, July.
    2. Russo Lopes, Gabriela & Bastos Lima, Mairon G. & Reis, Tiago N.P. dos, 2021. "Maldevelopment revisited: Inclusiveness and social impacts of soy expansion over Brazil’s Cerrado in Matopiba," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    3. Lynn Gregory & Kathleen Schroeder & Cynthia Wood, 2021. "A Paradigm Shift in International Service-Learning: The Imperative for Reciprocal Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-15, April.
    4. Bourgoin, Jeremy & Diop, Djibril & Touré, Labaly & Grislain, Quentin & Interdonato, Roberto & Dieye, Mohamadou & Corniaux, Christian & Meunier, Julien & Dia, Djiby & Seck, Sidy M., 2022. "Beyond controversy, putting a livestock footprint on the map of the Senegal River delta," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    5. Verena Röll & Christiane Meyer, 2020. "Young People’s Perceptions of World Cultural Heritage: Suggestions for a Critical and Reflexive World Heritage Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-18, October.
    6. Gonsior, Victoria & Klingebiel, Stephan, 2019. "The development policy system under pressure: acknowledging limitations, sourcing advantages and moving towards a broader perspective," IDOS Discussion Papers 6/2019, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    7. Ivica Petrikova & Melita Lazell, 2022. "“Securitized” UK aid projects in Africa: Evidence from Kenya, Nigeria and South Sudan," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 40(1), January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:12:y:2022:i:3:p:76-:d:808292. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.