IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsoctx/v10y2019i1p2-d300788.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ethics in Categorizing Ethnicity and Disability in Research with Children

Author

Listed:
  • Ingfrid Mattingsdal Thorjussen

    (Department of Cultural and Social Studies, Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, 0863 Oslo, Norway)

  • Terese Wilhelmsen

    (Department of Educational Science, University of South-Easter Norway, 3045 Drammen, Norway)

Abstract

The use of categories is a contested subject in social sciences. The use of social categories allows researchers to explore similarities, differences, and inequalities between groups of people. However, by using social categories, researchers run the risk of essentializing differences. The aim of this article is to problematize the procedural and relational ethics of using categories in research with children. Based on two research projects studying inclusion and exclusion in physical education, we examine the ongoing ethical dilemmas of categorizing children in terms of disability and ethnic background. The reflections are grounded in intersectional and relational ethical perspectives with a focus on how power is manifested in practices and structures throughout the research process. The data consist of field notes, transcripts of interviews with children and their parents, and the authors’ reflective accounts. The results are organized into three main themes: (1) How categories frame the research in its initial phases (informed consent and voluntary participation), (2) power relationships in context (navigating meanings of categories in the interviews and the relational ethics of generational ordering in combined interviews with children and their parents), and (3) (re)constructing stories and ensuring anonymity. In the discussion, we reflect on how singling out groups of children framed the research, how categories and power relations were negotiated and navigated in interviews and fieldwork, and how, in the reporting of the results, understandings of the children and their experiences were constructed. We argue that by not reflecting on the ethics of categorizing children in research, researchers are in danger of reproducing rather than challenging social inequality and discrimination.

Suggested Citation

  • Ingfrid Mattingsdal Thorjussen & Terese Wilhelmsen, 2019. "Ethics in Categorizing Ethnicity and Disability in Research with Children," Societies, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-15, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:10:y:2019:i:1:p:2-:d:300788
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/10/1/2/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/10/1/2/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mathilde Cecchini, 2019. "Reinforcing and Reproducing Stereotypes? Ethical Considerations When Doing Research on Stereotypes and Stereotyped Reasoning," Societies, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-13, November.
    2. Janet Boddy, 2014. "Research across cultures, within countries: Hidden ethics tensions in research with children and families?," Progress in Development Studies, , vol. 14(1), pages 91-103, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Skivenes, Marit & Thoburn, June, 2016. "Pathways to permanence in England and Norway: A critical analysis of documents and data," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 152-160.
    2. Christina Prediger & Katherina Heinrichs & Hürrem Tezcan-Güntekin & Gertraud Stadler & Laura Pilz González & Patricia Lyk & Gunver Majgaard & Christiane Stock, 2023. "LGBTQIA+ Adolescents’ Perceptions of Gender Tailoring and Portrayal in a Virtual-Reality-Based Alcohol-Prevention Tool: A Qualitative Interview Study and Thematic Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-20, February.
    3. Christina Prediger & Robert Hrynyschyn & Iasmina Iepan & Christiane Stock, 2022. "Adolescents’ Perceptions of Gender Aspects in a Virtual-Reality-Based Alcohol-Prevention Tool: A Focus Group Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-17, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:10:y:2019:i:1:p:2-:d:300788. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.