IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v9y2020i9p149-d403137.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Women in the Extreme and Radical Right: Forms of Participation and Their Implications

Author

Listed:
  • Kristy Campion

    (Australian Graduate School of Policing and Security, Charles Sturt University, Bathurst, NSW 2678, Australia)

Abstract

The recent inclusion of male supremacy under the umbrella of right-wing extremism (RWE) can obscure the allure that the extreme and radical right holds for some women. This study examines women’s participation in the extreme and radical right to advance a novel conceptualization for engagement. Accordingly, six forms of participation are proposed, being violent actors, thinkers, facilitators, promoters, activists, and as gendered exemplars for others. This has implications for operations, ideology, and identity. First, women’s participation in violence has commonly been in conjunction with a group or a two-person dyad; it is rare that they operate as lone actors. Women also facilitate or sustain violent operations, through engaging in support activities that contribute to mission completion. Second, women create and promote radical right-wing ideology, challenge select discourses and magnify others to cultivate ideologically symbolic expressions of femininity. Third, such expressions contribute to extreme and radical belief systems, and provides select women with identity security and personal meaning. It is therefore possible to observe an ideological ecosystem spanning the extreme and radical right, in which women participate and interact.

Suggested Citation

  • Kristy Campion, 2020. "Women in the Extreme and Radical Right: Forms of Participation and Their Implications," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-20, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:9:y:2020:i:9:p:149-:d:403137
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/9/9/149/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/9/9/149/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Abrahms, Max & Potter, Philip B.K., 2015. "Explaining Terrorism: Leadership Deficits and Militant Group Tactics," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 69(2), pages 311-342, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kristy Campion & Scott Poynting, 2021. "International Nets and National Links: The Global Rise of the Extreme Right—Introduction to Special Issue," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-7, February.
    2. Nisreen N. Al-Khawaldeh & Alaeddin A. Banikalef & Luqman M. Rababah & Ali F. Khawaldeh, 2024. "Ideological representations of women in Jordanian folk proverbs from the perspective of cultural semiotics," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-10, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Christophe Muller & Pierre Pecher, 2021. "Terrorism, Insurgency, State Repression, and Cycles of Violence," Working Papers halshs-03134347, HAL.
    2. Michael Gibilisco & Brenton Kenkel & Miguel R. Rueda, 2022. "Competition and Civilian Victimization," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 66(4-5), pages 809-835, May.
    3. Victor Asal & Brian J. Phillips, 2018. "What explains ethnic organizational violence? Evidence from Eastern Europe and Russia," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 35(2), pages 111-131, March.
    4. Sara MT Polo, 2020. "The quality of terrorist violence: Explaining the logic of terrorist target choice," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 57(2), pages 235-250, March.
    5. Peter Schram, 2019. "Managing Insurgency," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 63(10), pages 2319-2353, November.
    6. Jori Breslawski & Brandon Ives, 2019. "Killing for God? Factional Violence on the Transnational Stage," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 63(3), pages 617-643, March.
    7. Laura Huber, 2019. "When Civilians Are Attacked: Gender Equality and Terrorist Targeting," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 63(10), pages 2289-2318, November.
    8. Yasutaka Tominaga, 2021. "Organizational context matters: explaining different responses to militant leadership targeting," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 38(3), pages 270-291, May.
    9. Kirssa Cline Ryckman, 2020. "Lasting peace or temporary calm? Rebel group decapitation and civil war outcomes," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 37(2), pages 172-192, March.
    10. Maria del Pilar Castillo & Giácomo Balbinotto N., 2017. "A model of desertion. From a principal-agent theory perspective," Revista Cuadernos de Economia, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, FCE, CID, vol. 36(70), pages 19-47, January.
    11. Michelle Sydes & Lorelei Hine & Angela Higginson & James McEwan & Laura Dugan & Lorraine Mazerolle, 2023. "Criminal justice interventions for preventing radicalisation, violent extremism and terrorism: An evidence and gap map," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(4), December.
    12. Max Abrahms & Luis Alfonso Dau & Elizabeth M Moore, 2019. "Terrorism and corporate social responsibility: Testing the impact of attacks on CSR behavior," Journal of International Business Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 2(3), pages 237-257, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:9:y:2020:i:9:p:149-:d:403137. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.