IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/jocore/v66y2022i4-5p809-835.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Competition and Civilian Victimization

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Gibilisco
  • Brenton Kenkel
  • Miguel R. Rueda

Abstract

Violence against civilians in civil war is widely thought of as a strategic choice by combatant groups. We argue that a common strategic logic of competition underlies diverse theories of civilian victimization. We develop a theory of strategic complements in victimization, hypothesizing that an armed group’s propensity to victimize civilians will increase with its expectation that its competitors will act likewise. We test this argument by structurally estimating a formal model of strategic interdependence between armed groups using data from the Colombian civil war. Our findings indicate that strategic expectations are responsible for a substantial amount of violence against civilians: the two major combatant groups would have systematically victimized civilians in at least 9% fewer municipalities if they had expected no violence by their rival. Examining causal mechanisms, we also find that victimization in the Colombian case was more likely aimed at controlling civilians than at influencing peace negotiations.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Gibilisco & Brenton Kenkel & Miguel R. Rueda, 2022. "Competition and Civilian Victimization," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 66(4-5), pages 809-835, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:jocore:v:66:y:2022:i:4-5:p:809-835
    DOI: 10.1177/00220027211070621
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00220027211070621
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/00220027211070621?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nieman, Mark David, 2015. "Statistical Analysis of Strategic Interaction with Unobserved Player Actions: Introducing a Strategic Probit with Partial Observability," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 23(3), pages 429-448, July.
    2. Abrahms, Max & Potter, Philip B.K., 2015. "Explaining Terrorism: Leadership Deficits and Militant Group Tactics," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 69(2), pages 311-342, April.
    3. Wood, Reed M. & Kathman, Jacob D., 2014. "Too Much of a Bad Thing? Civilian Victimization and Bargaining in Civil War," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 44(3), pages 685-706, July.
    4. Jakana Thomas, 2014. "Rewarding Bad Behavior: How Governments Respond to Terrorism in Civil War," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 58(4), pages 804-818, October.
    5. Wood, Reed M., 2014. "From Loss to Looting? Battlefield Costs and Rebel Incentives for Violence," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 68(4), pages 979-999, October.
    6. Lucy Hovil & Eric Werker, 2005. "Portrait of a Failed Rebellion," Rationality and Society, , vol. 17(1), pages 5-34, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Govinda Clayton & Håvard Mokleiv Nygård & Siri A. Rustad & Håvard Strand, 2023. "Costs and Cover: Explaining the Onset of Ceasefires in Civil Conflict," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 67(7-8), pages 1296-1324, August.
    2. Kirssa Cline Ryckman & Jessica Maves Braithwaite, 2020. "Changing horses in midstream: Leadership changes and the civil war peace process," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 37(1), pages 83-105, January.
    3. Robert Ulrich Nagel, 2021. "Gendered preferences: How women’s inclusion in society shapes negotiation occurrence in intrastate conflicts," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 58(3), pages 433-448, May.
    4. Jürgen Brandsch & André Python, 2021. "Provoking Ordinary People: The Effects of Terrorism on Civilian Violence," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 65(1), pages 135-165, January.
    5. Kirssa Cline Ryckman, 2020. "Lasting peace or temporary calm? Rebel group decapitation and civil war outcomes," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 37(2), pages 172-192, March.
    6. Tiffany S Chu & Jessica Maves Braithwaite, 2018. "The effect of sexual violence on negotiated outcomes in civil conflicts," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 35(3), pages 233-247, May.
    7. Gaku Ito & Kaisa Hinkkainen Elliott, 2020. "Battle Diffusion Matters: Examining the Impact of Microdynamics of Fighting on Conflict Termination," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 64(5), pages 871-902, May.
    8. Austin L. Wright, 2016. "Economic Shocks and Rebel," HiCN Working Papers 232, Households in Conflict Network.
    9. Christophe Muller & Pierre Pecher, 2021. "Terrorism, Insurgency, State Repression, and Cycles of Violence," Working Papers halshs-03134347, HAL.
    10. Roman Krtsch, 2021. "The Tactical Use of Civil Resistance by Rebel Groups: Evidence from India’s Maoist Insurgency," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 65(7-8), pages 1251-1277, August.
    11. Piotr Lis & Michael Spagat & Uih Ran Lee, 2021. "Civilian targeting in African conflicts: A poor actor’s game that spreads through space," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 58(5), pages 900-914, September.
    12. Francesco Trebbi & Eric Weese, 2019. "Insurgency and Small Wars: Estimation of Unobserved Coalition Structures," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 87(2), pages 463-496, March.
    13. Justin M. Conrad & Kevin T. Greene & James Igoe Walsh & Beth Elise Whitaker, 2019. "Rebel Natural Resource Exploitation and Conflict Duration," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 63(3), pages 591-616, March.
    14. Patricia Lynne Sullivan & Johannes Karreth, 2019. "Strategies and Tactics in Armed Conflict: How Governments and Foreign Interveners Respond to Insurgent Threats," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 63(9), pages 2207-2232, October.
    15. Brian Blankenship, 2018. "When Do States Take the Bait? State Capacity and the Provocation Logic of Terrorism," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 62(2), pages 381-409, February.
    16. Thiemo Fetzer & Pedro C. L. Souza & Oliver Vanden Eynde & Austin L. Wright, 2021. "Security Transitions," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 111(7), pages 2275-2308, July.
    17. J Michael Greig & T David Mason & Jesse Hamner, 2018. "Win, lose, or draw in the fog of civil war," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 35(5), pages 523-543, September.
    18. Victor Asal & Brian J. Phillips, 2018. "What explains ethnic organizational violence? Evidence from Eastern Europe and Russia," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 35(2), pages 111-131, March.
    19. Alex Braithwaite & Tiffany S. Chu, 2018. "Civil Conflicts Abroad, Foreign Fighters, and Terrorism at Home," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 62(8), pages 1636-1660, September.
    20. Sara MT Polo, 2020. "The quality of terrorist violence: Explaining the logic of terrorist target choice," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 57(2), pages 235-250, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:jocore:v:66:y:2022:i:4-5:p:809-835. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://pss.la.psu.edu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.