IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v9y2020i11p204-d443220.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Social Network Consequences of a Gang Murder Blowout

Author

Listed:
  • Alice Airola

    (School of Criminology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC V5A 1S6, Canada)

  • Martin Bouchard

    (School of Criminology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC V5A 1S6, Canada)

Abstract

An unexpected crisis in a criminal organization offers a rare opportunity to analyze whether and how the configuration of business and trust relationships changes in response to external shocks. The current study recreates the social network of the Red Scorpion gang members involved in the Surrey Six Murder, one of the deadliest gang-related homicides to occur in Canada. The event, which involved two bystanders and six victims in total, was the result of a poorly executed retaliation. Our analyses focus on two phases of the network, the conspiracy phase and the post-murder phase. In each phase, we examine the balance of business, trust, and conflictual ties. Results show that the relative importance of key participants changed from the conspiracy to the post-murder phases, whereby strong, trusted ties gained prominence over the mostly business-oriented network of the conspiracy phase.

Suggested Citation

  • Alice Airola & Martin Bouchard, 2020. "The Social Network Consequences of a Gang Murder Blowout," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-15, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:9:y:2020:i:11:p:204-:d:443220
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/9/11/204/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/9/11/204/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Carlo Morselli & Katia Petit, 2007. "Law-Enforcement Disruption of a Drug Importation Network," Global Crime, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(2), pages 109-130, May.
    2. David A. Bright & Jordan J. Delaney, 2013. "Evolution of a drug trafficking network: Mapping changes in network structure and function across time," Global Crime, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(2-3), pages 238-260, May.
    3. Paoli, Letizia, 2008. "Mafia Brotherhoods: Organized Crime, Italian Style," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780195375268.
    4. Shi, Xiaolin & Adamic, Lada A. & Strauss, Martin J., 2007. "Networks of strong ties," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 378(1), pages 33-47.
    5. Argote, Linda & Turner, Marlene E. & Fichman, Mark, 1989. "To centralize or not to centralize: The effects of uncertainty and threat on group structure and performance," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 43(1), pages 58-74, February.
    6. Hossain, Liaquat & Murshed, Shahriar Tanvir & Uddin, Shahadat, 2013. "Communication network dynamics during organizational crisis," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 7(1), pages 16-35.
    7. Stephen P. Borgatti, 2006. "Identifying sets of key players in a social network," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 21-34, April.
    8. Klaus von Lampe & Per Ole Johansen, 2004. "Organized Crime and Trust: On the conceptualization and empirical relevance of trust in the context of criminal networks," Global Crime, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(2), pages 159-184, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Matthew Valasik & Shannon E. Reid, 2021. "“The More Things Change, the More They Stay the Same”: Research on Gang-Related Violence in the 21st Century—Introduction to Special Issue," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-5, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Annamaria Ficara & Francesco Curreri & Giacomo Fiumara & Pasquale De Meo & Antonio Liotta, 2022. "Covert Network Construction, Disruption, and Resilience: A Survey," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(16), pages 1-43, August.
    2. Manzi, Deborah & Calderoni, Francesco, 2024. "The resilience of drug trafficking organizations: Simulating the impact of police arresting key roles," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    3. Goldrosen, Nicholas, 2024. "Is corrections officers' use of illegal force networked? Network structure, brokerage, and key players in the New York City Department of Correction," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    4. Ayamga, Matthew & Annosi, Maria Carmela & Kassahun, Ayalew & Dolfsma, Wilfred & Tekinerdogan, Bedir, 2024. "Adaptive organizational responses to varied types of failures: Empirical insights from technology providers in Ghana," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    5. Mark J. O. Bagley, 2019. "Networks, geography and the survival of the firm," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 29(4), pages 1173-1209, September.
    6. Hosseinali Salemi & Austin Buchanan, 2022. "Solving the Distance-Based Critical Node Problem," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 34(3), pages 1309-1326, May.
    7. Capponi, Agostino & Corell, Felix & Stiglitz, Joseph E., 2022. "Optimal bailouts and the doom loop with a financial network," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 35-50.
    8. Zhao, Shuying & Sun, Shaowei, 2023. "Identification of node centrality based on Laplacian energy of networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 609(C).
    9. Raddant, Matthias & Takahashi, Hiroshi, 2019. "The Japanese corporate board network," Kiel Working Papers 2130, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    10. Liberati, Caterina & Marzo, Massimiliano & Zagaglia, Paolo & Zappa, Paola, 2012. "Structural distortions in the Euro interbank market: the role of 'key players' during the recent market turmoil," MPRA Paper 40223, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Michel Grabisch & Agnieszka Rusinowska, 2015. "Lattices in Social Networks with Influence," International Game Theory Review (IGTR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 17(01), pages 1-18.
    12. Andrea Galeotti & Benjamin Golub & Sanjeev Goyal, 2020. "Targeting Interventions in Networks," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 88(6), pages 2445-2471, November.
    13. Marco Di Summa & Syed Md Omar Faruk, 2023. "Critical node/edge detection problems on trees," 4OR, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 439-455, September.
    14. Venel, Xavier, 2021. "Regularity of dynamic opinion games," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 305-334.
    15. Gallo, Julie Le & Plunket, Anne, 2020. "Regional gatekeepers, inventor networks and inventive performance: Spatial and organizational channels," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(5).
    16. Yadira Méndez-Lemus & Antonio Vieyra & Lorena Poncela, 2017. "Peri-urban local governance? Intra-government relationships and social capital in a peripheral municipality of Michoacán, Mexico," Progress in Development Studies, , vol. 17(1), pages 1-23, January.
    17. Gloria Hongyee Chan & T. Wing Lo & Gabriel Kwun-Wa Lee & Cherry Hau-Lin Tam, 2020. "Social Capital and Social Networks of Hidden Drug Abuse in Hong Kong," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-15, August.
    18. Yuming Guo, 2023. "Towards the efficient generation of variant design in product development networks: network nodes importance based product configuration evaluation approach," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 34(2), pages 615-631, February.
    19. Smith, Thomas Bryan, 2021. "Gang crackdowns and offender centrality in a countywide co-offending network: A networked evaluation of Operation Triple Beam," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    20. Saxena, Rakhi & Kaur, Sharanjit & Bhatnagar, Vasudha, 2019. "Identifying similar networks using structural hierarchy," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 536(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:9:y:2020:i:11:p:204-:d:443220. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.