IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v13y2024i7p376-d1439460.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Athlete Maltreatment as a Wicked Problem and Contested Terrain

Author

Listed:
  • Haewan Park

    (School of Physical Education, Sport and Exercise Sciences, University of Otago, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand
    New Zealand Centre for Sport Policy and Politics, University of Otago, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand)

  • Michael P. Sam

    (School of Physical Education, Sport and Exercise Sciences, University of Otago, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand
    New Zealand Centre for Sport Policy and Politics, University of Otago, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand)

  • Steven J. Jackson

    (School of Physical Education, Sport and Exercise Sciences, University of Otago, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand
    New Zealand Centre for Sport Policy and Politics, University of Otago, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand)

Abstract

Athlete maltreatment in organized sport has attracted considerable attention from governing bodies, stakeholders and the general public. Despite numerous studies and policy proposals from various countries, the problem remains unresolved due to its inherent complexity. Drawing upon the concept of ‘a wicked problem’ widely utilized in policy analysis, this study first identifies the wicked features of maltreatment, focusing on: (1) the difficulty of establishing a definition of maltreatment; (2) the challenges of identifying its causes; and (3) the impediments to identifying solutions in a context of embedded stakeholders and unintended consequences. To provide further analysis, we compare athlete maltreatment with other issues in sport such as doping and match-fixing, to suggest that lessons can be drawn from other wicked problems in the same contested terrain. Overall, given the complex interplay between maltreatment and the maintenance/legitimization of sport systems, this paper calls for continuing attention and evaluation of existing research/policies and advocates for a more multidimensional view that acknowledges maltreatment as a wicked problem.

Suggested Citation

  • Haewan Park & Michael P. Sam & Steven J. Jackson, 2024. "Athlete Maltreatment as a Wicked Problem and Contested Terrain," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-15, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:13:y:2024:i:7:p:376-:d:1439460
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/13/7/376/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/13/7/376/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Victoria Roberts & Victor Sojo & Felix Grant, 2020. "Organisational factors and non-accidental violence in sport: A systematic review," Sport Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(1), pages 8-27, January.
    2. Emma Kavanagh & Adi Adams & Daniel Lock & Carly Stewart & Jamie Cleland, 2020. "Managing abuse in sport: An introduction to the special issue," Sport Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(1), pages 1-7, January.
    3. Roslyn Kerr & Gretchen Kerr, 2020. "Promoting athlete welfare: A proposal for an international surveillance system," Sport Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(1), pages 95-103, January.
    4. Roberts, Victoria & Sojo, Victor & Grant, Felix, 2020. "Organisational factors and non-accidental violence in sport: A systematic review," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 8-27.
    5. Terry Engelberg & Stephen Moston & James Skinner, 2015. "The final frontier of anti-doping: A study of athletes who have committed doping violations," Sport Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(2), pages 268-279, April.
    6. Gretchen Kerr & Bruce Kidd & Peter Donnelly, 2020. "One Step Forward, Two Steps Back: The Struggle for Child Protection in Canadian Sport," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-16, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jay L. Caulfield & Felissa K. Lee & Catharyn A. Baird, 2023. "Navigating the Ethically Complex and Controversial World of College Athletics: A Humanistic Leadership Approach to Student Athlete Well-Being," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 183(2), pages 603-617, March.
    2. Ellen MacPherson & Anthony Battaglia & Gretchen Kerr & Sophie Wensel & Sarah McGee & Aalaya Milne & Francesca Principe & Erin Willson, 2022. "Evaluation of Publicly Accessible Child Protection in Sport Education and Reporting Initiatives," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-17, July.
    3. Steven J. Jackson & Michael P. Sam & Marcelle C. Dawson, 2024. "The Contested Terrain of Sport and Well-Being: Health and Wellness or Wellbeing Washing?," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-13, July.
    4. Verschuuren, Pim, 2020. "Whistleblowing determinants and the effectiveness of reporting channels in the international sports sector," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 142-154.
    5. Daniel Westmattelmann & Marius Sprenger & Sascha Hokamp & Gerhard Schewe, 2020. "Money matters: The impact of prize money on doping behaviour," Sport Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(4), pages 688-703, October.
    6. Flavio Pinto & Yogachandran Rahulamathavan & James Skinner, 2022. "Blockchain for Doping Control Applications in Sports: A Conceptual Approach," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-24, July.
    7. Kim, Minjung & Kim, Young Do & Lee, Hyun-Woo, 2020. "It is time to consider athletes’ well-being and performance satisfaction: The roles of authentic leadership and psychological capital," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 23(5), pages 964-977.
    8. Barkoukis, Vassilis & Kartali, Katerina & Lazuras, Lambros & Tsorbatzoudis, Haralambos, 2016. "Evaluation of an anti-doping intervention for adolescents: Findings from a school-based study," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 19(1), pages 23-34.
    9. Zhangyan Deng & Jinyang Guo & Dong Wang & Zuosong Chen, 2022. "A Supplementary Approach for Effective Anti-Doping Education: A Pilot Study Applying Refutation Texts to Modify Misperception of the Whereabouts System," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-12, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:13:y:2024:i:7:p:376-:d:1439460. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.